Case law

Thaxter v. Zoning Bd. of Appeals

Superior Court of Maine · Jun 26, 2008

Standard of Review This court will uphold a zoning board's decision unless that decision is an abuse of discretion, contrary to law or lacks the support of substantial evidence on the record. Uliano v. … Brackett v. Town of Rangeley, 2003 ME 109 <]I 15, 831 A.2d 422,427; however, the court may not substitute its own judgment for that of the Board on factual determinations. Forbes v.

National Organization for Marriage v. Maine Comm'n on Governmental Ethical and Election Practices

Superior Court of Maine · Apr 10, 2015

United States v. … Brown's involvement in both organizations is relevant because he was on both sides of the subject transactions. Brown could designate donated funds for the pmvose of the Maine C!

Jeremiah Hogan v. Lincoln Medical Partners

2025 ME 22 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Mar 4, 2025

See Jamison v. … Williams v. Brown, 567 F. Supp. 3d 1213, 1226 (D. Or. 2021); see also Norris v. Stanley, 567 F. Supp. 3d 818, 821 (W.D.

New Heritage Builders, Inc. v. Town of Old Orchard Beach

Superior Court of Maine · Jan 14, 2004

The board’s findings will not be disturbed if supported by substantial evidence contained in the record. Palesky v. Town of Topsham, 614 A.2d 1307, 1309 (Me. 1992). … Severance v. Choate, 553 A.2d 1288, 1291 (Me. 1987). Here, the Planning Board imposed the Construction Contributions as conditions of the approval of the Development.

Prentice v. Town of Cape Elizabeth

Superior Court of Maine · May 15, 2003

Yates v. … However, the court declines to consider these facts because they were not part of the Board's proceedings and the court is limited to the record before that Board. M.R. Civ. P. 80B(f); Sahl v.

Derice v. Maine State Retirement System

Superior Court of Maine · Oct 19, 2005

1 ( 15 GAIL DERICE, Appellant v. … Riclzarsoi~v. Board of Tr~~stees of the Maine State Retiremeizt Systenz, 1998 ME 171, T4, 714 A.2d 154, 156.

B & K Realty, LLC v. Town of Ogunquit

Superior Court of Maine · Jan 13, 2005

In Malonson v. Town of Berwick, 2004 ME 96, {5 the Law Court stated, “When an Ordinance specifically defines a term, we will not redefine it.” … Jordan v. City of Ellsworth, 2003 ME 82, (10, 828 A.2d 768, 771.

Federal Deposit Insurance v. S. Prawer & Co.

829 F. Supp. 453 · District Court, D. Maine · Jul 28, 1993

See Brown Transport Corp. v. Street, 194 Ga.App. 717, 719 , 391 S.E.2d 699, 702 (Ga. … See Atlanta Shipping Corp. v.

Daly v. Bd. of Licensure in Med.

Superior Court of Maine · Jul 20, 2002

DALY, M.D., Plaintiff v. ORDER AND DECISION EDICINE, “an BOARD OF LICENSURE IN MEDICIN DONALD L. GARBRECHT LAW LIBRARY Defendant JUL 24 2109 Dr. Jay M. … In Balian v.

Greene v. Willey

147 Me. 227 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jan 21, 1952

See Meserve v. … Duff v. Husted, 111 Atl. 186 (Conn.), relied on by plaintiff, raised the question of whether contributory negligence was attributable to a boy of six years playing on the road, — held question for jury. In Brown v.

Caswell v. Kent

158 Me. 493 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Dec 18, 1962

(Neb.) 872; Pardee v. Grubiss (1929), 34 Ohio App. 474 , 171 N. E. 375 ; (cf. Sutton v. Bethell (1953), 116 N. E. (2nd) (Ohio App.) 594) ; Younker v. Johnson (1954), 160 Ohio St. 409 , 116 N. … The opinion in Johnston v.

Chaisson v. Williams

130 Me. 341 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Sep 2, 1931

Avery v. Thompson, 117 Me., 120; Peasley v. White, 129 Me., 450. … Brown v. Des Moines Bottling Works (Iowa, 1916), 156 N. W., 829 , 1 A. L. R., *349 835. Negligence was inferred, in New York, where defendant ran his automobile into a pedestrian on the sidewalk. Green v.

State v. Conlogue

474 A.2d 167 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Apr 3, 1984

E.g., Brown v. United States, 409 A.2d 1093 (D.C.1979); Fortson v. State, 269 Ind. 161 , 379 N.E.2d 147 (1978); State v. Hamlette, 302 N.C. 490 , 276 S.E.2d 338 (1981); State v. … State v. Mitchell 390 A.2d 495, 501 (Me.1978); see also State v. Lagasse, 410 A.2d 537, 542 (Me.1980).

Ward v. Merrill

154 Me. 45 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · May 14, 1958

Fitts v. Marquis, 127 Me. 75, 79 ; 140 A. 909 . … McCaffrey et al v. Silk, Jr., 150 Me. 58, 61 ; 104 A. 2d. 436. As was said in Stearns v.

Belfast & Moosehead Lake R. R. v. Inhabitants of Brooks

60 Me. 568 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 1, 1872

Grover v. Pembroke, 11 Allen, 89 ; School District v. Blakeslee, 13 Conn. 234 . … Whether or not the requisite amount had been subscribed by responsible parties must necessarily be decided by the-board of directors, for there was no other person or persons, or tribunal, by whom the question could be determined

State v. Gulick

759 A.2d 1085 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Oct 6, 2000

See State v. … Delaware v.

O'Donnell v. Maine State Bd. of Nursing

Superior Court of Maine · Dec 20, 2004

AP-04-39, DEM- KEN - \>] a jRnoor PETER O/DONNELL, Petitioner v. DECISION AND ORDER MAINE STATE BOARD OF vi Ly NURSING, Respondent tS OP ge Once again Mr. O’Donnell is before the court on a M.R. Civ. … It is clear that licensing boards do not have jurisdiction over individuals who do not hold a license pursuant to that board. Golz v. Maine Real Estate Commission, 634 A.2d 1288 (Me. 1993).

Marquis Products, Inc. v. Conquest Carpet Mills, Inc. (In Re Marquis Products, Inc.)

150 B.R. 487 · United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Maine · Feb 10, 1993

Marquis’ board authorized a Chapter 11 filing on June 14, and Marquis filed its petition on June 18, 1991. 4 *489 2. The Inter-Company Relationship. … Hickman v.

Keates v. Town of Freeport

Superior Court of Maine · Dec 1, 2022

Stucki v. Flavin, 291 A.2d 508,510 (Me. 1972). Petitioner argues that the Law Court's ruling in Wake/in v. … Chamber ofCommerce v.

State v. Wentworth

65 Me. 234 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Oct 6, 1875

Com. v. Nichols, 10 Metc., 259 . State v. Brown, 31 Maine, 520. Com. v. Morgan, 107 Mass., 199 . II. … In Ward v.