Case law

State v. Albert

125 Me. 325 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jun 17, 1926

In Booth v. Commonwealth, 16 Gratt. … State v. Quimby, 51 Maine, 395.

JONES v. JASPER WYMAN & SON

District Court, D. Maine · Nov 8, 2022

P.C. v. Wells, 538 U.S. 440 (2003)); Kern v. … In Perez v. Progenics Pharm., Inc., No. 10-cv-08278 (LAP), 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 83557 (S.D.N.Y.

State v. Caliendo

136 Me. 169 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Mar 16, 1939

One of the windows in the kitchen was fastened with a bar diagonally across the upper sash and the other window in that room was partially boarded up. … Collins v. Com., 75 Ky., 271 ; Com. v. Smith, 162 Mass., 508 , 39 N. E., 111 ; State v. Mathews, 202 Mo., 143 , 100 S. W., 420 ; Adams v. People, 9 Hun. (N. Y.), 89; State v. Little, 174 N. C., 793 , 94 S.

Molinelli v. Town of Boothbay

Superior Court of Maine · Feb 4, 2019

A planning board's interpretation of an ordinance is a question of law that the court reviews de novo. Aydelott v. City of Portland, 2010 ME 25, <JI 10, 990 A.2d 1024 (citing Logan v. … Lewis v. Me. Coast Artists, 2001 ME 75, <JI 15, 770 A.2d 644.

Estate of Gordan

2004 Me. 23 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Feb 26, 2004

Zulk v. … Truman v. Browne, 2001 ME 182, ¶ 9 , 788 A.2d 168, 170 . We review the denial of a motion to *1276 set aside a default and default judgment for an abuse of discretion.

Arnold v. Town of Ogunquit

Superior Court of Maine · Jun 27, 2000

v. … Can the Board grant these waivers or are they really variances which only a Board of Appeals or Zoning Board of Appeal can grant? See Perkins v. Town of Ogunquit, 1998 Me. 42, 709 A.2d 106.

Francis Small Heritage Trust, Inc. v. The Town of Limington

Superior Court of Maine · May 30, 2013

Another case, which was cited by the Board at page 4 of its decision, is Johnson v. … The Board denied the Trust's appeal and an appeal to the Superior Court was timely filed. 10  V.

Paine v. State

258 A.2d 266 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Nov 7, 1969

It might be said that the prosecution of the criminal laws in county “A” do “concern the state at large or the general public” (See, however, State v. … Rounds, Petitioner, v. Smart, 71 Me. 380, 384 , reiterated in Watts Detective Agency, Inc. v. Inhabitants of County of Sagadahoc, 137 Me. 233, 236 , 18 A.2d 308 .

Georgia-Pacific Corp. v. Great Northern Nekoosa Corp.

795 F. Supp. 484 · District Court, D. Maine · Feb 15, 1990

V., Francavilla Dep. at 170-71. … Conclusions In General Host Corporation v.

Frank v. L.L. Bean, Inc.

352 F. Supp. 2d 8 · District Court, D. Maine · Jan 14, 2005

See Gonzalez v. … Li v. C.N. Brown Co., 645 A.2d 606, 608 (Me.1994).

Thaxter v. Zoning Bd. of Appeals

Superior Court of Maine · Jun 26, 2008

Standard of Review This court will uphold a zoning board's decision unless that decision is an abuse of discretion, contrary to law or lacks the support of substantial evidence on the record. Uliano v. … Brackett v. Town of Rangeley, 2003 ME 109 <]I 15, 831 A.2d 422,427; however, the court may not substitute its own judgment for that of the Board on factual determinations. Forbes v.

Gilmartin v. Emery

131 Me. 236 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jun 4, 1932

Parsons v. Bangor, 61 Me., 457. Knox v. Montville, 98 Me., 493. … Gorham v. Canton, 5 Me., 266; Wayne v. Greene, 21 Me., 357; Corinth v. Lincoln, 34 Me., 310; Etna v. Brewer, 78 Me., 377; Knox v. Montville, supra. “Residence, being a visible fact, is not usually in doubt.

Alford v. Richardson

120 Me. 316 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 2, 1921

Brown v. Lumbert, 221 Mass., 419, 420 . 1 Perry on Trusts, 5th Ed. Sections 386a, 386b. … Wright v. Blinn, supra.

Cramer v. Tarr

165 F. Supp. 130 · District Court, D. Maine · Sep 8, 1958

In Cohen v. … Holcomb v. Meeds, 1952, 173 Kan. 321 , 246 P.2d 239 ; Rapee v. Beacon Hotel Corp., 1944, 293 N.Y. 196 , 56 N.E.2d 548, 549 ; Meador v. Hotel Grover, 1942, 193 Miss. 392 , 9 So.2d 782, 785 .

Strunk v. Advent International Corporation

Superior Court of Maine · Mar 27, 2006

See Groboui v . Perot, 539 A.2d 180, 186 (Del. 1988) (overruled on other grounds by Breizm). Brehm's formulation of the second test is a product of the "challenged transaction" itself being a vote of the Board. … See id., see also Manzo v. Rite '4id Corp., 2002 Del. Ch.

Thayer v. Seavey

11 Me. 284 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · May 15, 1834

In Walter v. … Bird, 12 Mass. 443 , and Brown v. Penobscot Bank, 8 Mass. 445. To the same point may be cited Foster *292 als. exr. v. Essex Bank, 16 Mass. 245 .

State v. Bassford

440 A.2d 1059 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Feb 9, 1982

Blackwell v. State, Me., 311 A.2d 536 (1973); Johnson v. Maine Wetlands Control Board, Me., 250 A.2d 825 (1969). Similarly, we discharged a report in Matheson v. … Small v. Gartley, 363 A.2d at 731 .

B & K Realty, LLC v. Town of Ogunquit

Superior Court of Maine · Jan 13, 2005

In Malonson v. Town of Berwick, 2004 ME 96, {5 the Law Court stated, “When an Ordinance specifically defines a term, we will not redefine it.” … Jordan v. City of Ellsworth, 2003 ME 82, (10, 828 A.2d 768, 771.

Furber v. Fogler

97 Me. 585 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jun 30, 1903

While waiting he boarded at the house of the plaintiff and spent a part of his leisure around the mill. … Norton on Notes & Bills (3d ed.) 277; Worth v. Case, 42 N. Y. 362 ; Earl v. Peck, 64 N. Y. 596 ; Hamer v. Sidway, 124 N. Y. 538 , 21 Am. St. Rep. 693 .

Fickett v. Martin

Superior Court of Maine · Aug 10, 2010

~' CHRISTOPHER \V. FICKErI', Petitioner, v. … \'o Seider v. 1 The Court made inquiry to counsel for the Commisioner about the statutory authority establishing the IFWS "Review Board," None could be found in any statute or rule.