Case law

Martell v. Inh. Town of Limington

Superior Court of Maine · Aug 10, 2007

MARTELL, Plaintiff v. ORDER AND DECISION INH. … In Town of Freeport v.

Badger v. Hill

404 A.2d 222 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 27, 1979

Brown, 102 Me. 47, 58, 61-62 , 65 A. 516 (1906); Proprietors of Maine Wharf v. … In Reed v.

Int'l Woolen Co., Inc. v. Town of Sanford

Superior Court of Maine · Sep 9, 2002

AP-02-004 INTERNATIONAL WOOLEN po COMPANY, INC., Petitioner v. ORDER DONALD L. GARBRECHT LAW LIBRARY TOWN OF SANFORD, SEP 12. … In the case of Town of Vienna v.

State of Maine v. Akers

Superior Court of Maine · Apr 1, 2019

Brown v. fllinois, 422 U.S. 509, 599-600 (1975); Utah v. Strieff, 136 S. Ct. 2056, 2061 (2016); State v. Bailey, 2012 ME 55, 1 16, 41 A.3d 535. … Brown, 422 U.S. at 602 (quoting Wong Sun v. United States, 371 U.S. 471, 486 (1963)).

State v. Thornton

414 A.2d 229 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · May 13, 1980

In Andreson v. … A brown powdery substance, identified by one witness as marijuana, was located on the base of the scale.

Maine Employers Mut. Ins. Co. v. State of Maine, Workers' Comp.Bd.

Superior Court of Maine · Mar 25, 2004

Seider v. Board of Exam’r of Psychologists, 2000 ME 206 9, 762 A.2d 551, 555 (Me. 2000) (citing CWCO, Inc. v. Superintendent of Ins., 1997 ME 226, [6, 703 A.2d 1258, 1261 (Me. 1997)). … Harrington v. Town of Kennebunk, 459 A.2d at 562 (Me. 1983), citing Gashgai v. Board of Registration in Medicine, 390 A.2d 1080 (Me. 1978).

Eldar Invemtments, LLC v. Health Outcomes Worldwide Inc.

Superior Court of Maine · Aug 28, 2019

Rushton after he joined HOW's board and that Mr. Rushton was involved in the board's ultimate decision not to take the action urged by Mr. Sidman to remedy the alleged fraud. … Richardson v. McConologue, 672 A.2d 599, 600 (Me. 1996). "Motions for attachment must be supported by affidavit evidence." Lindner v. Barry, 2003 ME 91, ~ 5, 828 A.2d 788 (citing Wilson v.

JONES v. JASPER WYMAN & SON

District Court, D. Maine · Nov 8, 2022

P.C. v. Wells, 538 U.S. 440 (2003)); Kern v. … In Perez v. Progenics Pharm., Inc., No. 10-cv-08278 (LAP), 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 83557 (S.D.N.Y.

Arnold v. Town of Ogunquit

Superior Court of Maine · Jun 27, 2000

v. … Can the Board grant these waivers or are they really variances which only a Board of Appeals or Zoning Board of Appeal can grant? See Perkins v. Town of Ogunquit, 1998 Me. 42, 709 A.2d 106.

Springborn v. Town of Falmouth

Superior Court of Maine · Jul 5, 2001

Springborn v. Town of Falmouth, 2001 ME 57, { 5, 769 A.2d 852, 854. Phase I contained 28 units on the west side and Phase II contained 40 units on the east side. Id. … ); Goldman v.

Finn v. Lipman

526 A.2d 1380 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Mar 11, 1987

Haskell v. Planning Board of Town of Yarmouth, 388 A.2d 100, 102 (Me.1978). … See Surina v. Lucy, 168 Cal.App.3d 539 , 214 Cal.Rptr. 509 (1985); Rosefield v. Rosefield, 221 Cal.App.2d 431 , 34 Cal.Rptr. 479 (1963); Bennett v. Bennett, 682 F.2d 1039 (D.C.Cir.1982); Wood v.

In re New Motor Vehicles Canadian Export Antitrust Litigation

269 F.R.D. 80 · District Court, D. Maine · Aug 17, 2010

Brown v. Am. Honda (In re New Motor Vehicles Canadian Exp. Antitrust Litig.), 522 F.3d 6, 10-11 (1st Cir.2008). . Tabacco Decl. ¶ 7 (Docket Item 1043). . See In re New Motor Vehicles Canadian Exp. … These data are subject to accurate and ready determination at the website of the United States Board of Gover *87 nors of the Federal Reserve System.

United States v. Worthy

755 F. Supp. 2d 226 · District Court, D. Maine · Dec 20, 2010

United States v. … See United States v. Davis, 721 F.Supp.2d 59 (D.Me.2010); United States v. Widi, 697 F.Supp.2d 140, 143 (D.Me.2010) (Singal, J.); United States v. Brown, 335 F.Supp.2d 146, 148 (D.Me.2004); United States v.

Dimauro v. Springfield Terminal Railway Co.

187 F. Supp. 3d 205 · District Court, D. Maine · May 20, 2016

Accord Groncki v. … This case is unlike Jordan Hosp., Inc. v.

The Phebe

19 F. Cas. 418 · District Court, D. Maine · Jul 12, 1834

The cases of Reynolds v. Toppan, 15 Mass. 370 , Taggard v. Loring. 16 Mass. 336 . Thompson v. Snow, 4 Greenl. 258, and Emery v. Horsey, 4 Greenl. 407, have fixed *420 the legal construction of a contract like this. … It appears that she was in a leaky condition when the plaster was taken on board,' and without meeting with any bad weather, or any accident, she was obliged to put into port because she was, in fact, unseaworthy and unfit

State v. True

464 A.2d 946 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Aug 26, 1983

At that point, the supervisor stated to the three of them that during her drive from the hospital to the victim’s apartment she had seen a white male with dark curly hair and brown pants walking on Brighton Avenue. … See also State v.

Williams v. Maine Supreme Judicial Court Individual Justices

366 F. Supp. 2d 96 · District Court, D. Maine · Feb 4, 2005

This Court dismissed the federal action, pursuant to the doctrine of Younger v. … See, e.g., Brooks v. N.H. Supreme Court, 80 F.3d 633, 640 (1st Cir.1996). .

State v. Albert

125 Me. 325 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jun 17, 1926

In Booth v. Commonwealth, 16 Gratt. … State v. Quimby, 51 Maine, 395.

Berry v. Worldwide Language Resources, Inc.

270 F.R.D. 41 · District Court, D. Maine · Nov 2, 2010

See, e.g., Brown v. Crown Equip. Corp., 236 F.R.D. 58, 61 (D.Me.2006). Discussion WorldWide’s complaints of discovery abuses fall into three categories, discussed in turn, below. A. … See, e.g., Filippo v. Lee Publ’ns, Inc., No. 2:05 CV 64, 2007 WL 2713236 , *4-9, 2007 U.S. Dist. Lexis 68710, *10-25 (N.D.Ind. Sept. 12, 2007) (awarding costs based on successful motion to compel); Jones v.

Desjardins v. Town of Greene

Superior Court of Maine · Oct 17, 2002

York v. Town of Ogunquit, 2001 ME 53, { 6, 769 A.2d 172, 175. The interpretation of a zoning ordinance is a question of law to be determined by the court. Lewis v. … Shackford v. Gooch, Inc. v. Town of Kennebunk, 486 A.2d 102, 103-104 (Me. 1984). In this case, the pool was built before Leeman took any action whatsoever.