Case law

Commonwealth v. Brown

490 Pa. 560 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 3, 1980

Brown was forcibly removed to her home, screaming. Within minutes Ms. Brown ran from the house brandishing a knife and stabbed Veronica Jackson’s mother, Mrs. … Commonwealth v.

Thomas v. Brown

927 S.W.2d 122 · Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston) · Jun 13, 1996

Appellant claimed that (1) a new legal materials policy implemented by Brown violated appellant’s constitutional right of access to the courts and (2) Brown’s implementation of the policy before the Texas Board of Criminal … Blaylock v. Painter, 901 F.Supp. 233, 236 (W.D.Tex.1995) (citing Vandelft v. Moses, 31 F.3d 794, 797 (9th Cir.1994)); see also Marange v. Fontenot, 879 F.Supp. 679, 684 (E.D.Tex.1995).

Brown v. Runals

14 Wis. 693 · Wisconsin Supreme Court · Dec 30, 1861

Maynard v. Brown

41 Mich. 298 · Michigan Supreme Court · Jul 1, 1879

L., § 4694; Abell v. Munson, 18 Mich., 312 ; Cook v. Bell, id., 393 . *299 There are many reasons against and none in favor of granting the relief sought. … McMurtrie v. Bennette, Har. Ch., 124; Hawley v. Sheldon, Har. Ch., 420; Chambers v. Livermore, 15 Mich., 381. The above is clearly sufficient to dispose of this case.

Brown v. State

298 Ga. App. 545 · Court of Appeals of Georgia · Jun 25, 2009

Accordingly, we find that the evidence was sufficient to sustain Brown’s convictions under the standards of Jackson v. Virginia, supra. Judgment affirmed. Miller, C. … See Blair v. State, 216 Ga. App. 545, 546 (1) ( 455 SE2d 97 ) (1995). Jones v. State, 226 Ga. App. 608, 609 ( 487 SE2d 89 ) (1997). 2 Brown, in custody, was defending a charge that he had kidnapped his son.

Brown v. Grinstead

212 Mo. App. 533 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jun 26, 1923

[Wood v. Williams (Ill.), 31 N. E. 681 ; Parmelee v. Price (Ill.), 70 N. E. 725 ; Shelby County v. Bragg, 135 Mo. 291 , 26 S. W. 600 ; Callan v. Callan, 175 Mo. 346 , 4 S. W. 965 ; Beaty v. Cruce, 200 Mo. … S. 1919; McCoy v. Railroad, 134 Mo. App. 622 , 114 S. W. 1124 ; Deal v. Railroad, 176 Mo. App. 8 , 162 S. W. 760 .] What is said respecting limitations in Morgan v. Railroad, 57 Mo. App. 523 , Hurley v. Railroad, 57 Mo.

Brown v. State

38 Tex. 482 · Texas Supreme Court · Jul 1, 1873

(Villareal v. The State, 26 Texas, 107 ; and 23 Texas, 557 ; 27 Texas, 146, 438 , 765 ; 28 Texas, 711 ; 29 Texas, 500 ; 31 Texas, 608, 575 ; 30 Texas, 472 ; 33 Texas, 660 .)

Brown v. State

155 Tex. Crim. 233 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Nov 8, 1950

C., Sec. 1682; Price v. State, 81 Tex. Cr. R. 208 , *234 194 S. W. 827 ; Eubank v. State, 115 Tex. Cr. R. 112 , 28 S. W. 2d 808 ; Reid v. State, 138 Tex. Cr. R. 34 , 133 S. W. 2d 979 . … I arrested Louis Brown around eleven o’clock. He came to the jail around eleven, and surrendered to me.” Neither the gauge of the gun nor the size of the shots are shown.

Brown v. State

535 S.W.2d 640 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · Apr 14, 1976

. *642 Appellant relies upon Spead v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 500 S.W.2d 112 and Jones v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 467 S.W.2d 453 . … Pringle v. State, Tex.Cr. App., 511 S.W.2d 35 ; Drakes v. State, Tex. Cr.App., 505 S.W.2d 892 ; Johnson v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 504 S.W.2d 496 ; Morgan v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 502 S.W.2d 695 .

Robertson v. Brown

139 So. 2d 226 · Louisiana Court of Appeal · Mar 7, 1962

139 So.2d 226 (1962) Woodrow ROBERTSON v. Richard E. BROWN, Jr., Administrator of the Division of Employment Security, Department of Labor, State of Louisiana. No. 5483. Court of Appeal of Louisiana, First Circuit. … Also cited therein is American Bridge Co. v.

Brown v. Commonwealth

37 Va. App. 507 · Court of Appeals of Virginia · Feb 12, 2002

See Brown v. Commonwealth, 230 Va. 310, 337 S.E.2d 711 (1985). Brown seized the automobile by threatening Amos with a knife and ordering her out of the vehicle. Brown, thus, committed the offense of carjacking. … The factors set forth in Neil v.

People v. Brown

931 N.W.2d 345 · Michigan Supreme Court · Jul 29, 2019

People v. Brown

126 A.D.2d 898 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jan 29, 1987

Defendant and Henderson got into a fight with the victim while at defendant’s apartment and defendant hit the victim on the shoulders with a board. … Henderson then hit the victim over the head several times with the same board and pounded his head on the floor until he was unconscious.

Brown v. Bailey

215 S.C. 175 · Supreme Court of South Carolina · Aug 2, 1949

Virginia Brown, was employed by Simmons some time later. She was also a high school grad *181 uate and then in her early twenties. … Stoddard v.

Bellevue-Ochre Point Neighborhood Association v. Preservation Society of Newport County

151 A.3d 1223 · Supreme Court of Rhode Island · Jan 9, 2017

“[Z]oning boards are statutory bodies whose powers are legislatively delineated.” Duffy v. Milder, 896 A.2d 27, 36 (R.I. 2006). … As the foregoing language clearly states, the zoning board possesses the authority to interpret zoning ordinances. BOPNA cites to RICO Corp. v. Town of Exeter, 787 A.2d 1136 (R.I. 2001) and Olean v.

Brown v. . Snell

57 N.Y. 286 · New York Court of Appeals · May 5, 1874

In Salisbury v. … Justice BRONSON, delivering the opinion of the court, said the case could not be distinguished from Stillwell v.

State v. Brown

312 N.C. 237 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 6, 1984

State v. Sneeden, 274 N.C. 498 , 164 S.E. 2d 190 (1968); State v. Monds, 130 N.C. 697 , 41 S.E. 789 (1902). … State v. Moore, 311 N.C. 442, 463 , 319 S.E. 2d 150, 158 (1984) (Meyer, J., concurring). See also State v.

Brown v. Gilpin

75 Kan. 773 · Supreme Court of Kansas · May 11, 1907

On April 1, 1905, Wright did execute in Gilpin’s behalf a contract for the sale of the land to Brown. … Wright, agent, agrees to deliver to said Archy Brown or his assigns a good and sufficient *778 warranty deed for the above-described real estate, provided and upon the condition that the said Archy Brown or his assigns shall

Brown v. Harris

20 Ga. 403 · Supreme Court of Georgia · Jun 15, 1856

In our opinion, “ a mere substitution by the plaintiff of Rogers & Meara as debtor, in the place of Brown & Harris,” would, of itself have abrogated the debt as to Brown & Harris. … The cause of action which that testimony proved, was &>. contract of Brown & Harris made with Isaac C. Harris, as¡ the agent of some one, whom the testimony did not show..

People v. Brown

174 A.D.2d 448 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Jun 18, 1991

(See, People v Trues-dell, 70 NY2d 809 ; People v Brathwaite, 63 NY2d 839 .) Concur —Murphy, P. J., Carro, Kupferman, Asch and Rubin, JJ.