Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

FiltersNJ

10,000+ results

3.16s

  • Pinkus v. Reilly

    178 F. Supp. 399 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Nov 16, 1959

    In other words, the Post Office Department could rely upon the consensus of informed medical judgment to the contrary to establish the falsity of the Pinkus representations. To paraphrase Reilly v. … Clearly, these advertisements by him were intentional. Clearly, since they were contradictory, he knew he was then stating an intentional falsehood to the public.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • State v. Nevius

    426 N.J. Super. 379 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jun 18, 2012

    Ian Hood, who was qualified as an expert in forensic pathology, reviewed Gross’s autopsy report and photographs from the scene, and examined the recovered knife. … Clearly, where the crime in question was known to have been committed by a single person, a confession by a person other than the defendant, clearly an inculpatory statement, would have a strong tendency to exculpate the

    Cited 14 timesPublished
  • Leggett v. Barton

    40 N.J.L. 83 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Feb 15, 1878

    But the enactment forms part of the system, of bankruptcy which congress, in the exercise of its *85 constitutional power, has established. … a part of that section, it chose an appropriate and efficient means of evincing an intent to subject composition, proceedings to the force of the qualifying section, and to put the release of debts therein provided for,

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • State v. McKeon

    385 N.J. Super. 559 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · May 24, 2006

    Because we find that an otherwise qualified defendant should not be barred from PTI, we reverse and remand. … "[T]o reverse the denial of an application for PTI[,] a defendant must clearly and convincingly establish that the prosecutor's refusal to consent to admission to the program was based upon a patent and gross abuse of discretion

    Cited 7 timesPublished
  • GREMO v. BAYER CORPORATION

    District Court, D. New Jersey · Jun 7, 2019

    Petitioner contends this evidence conclusively establishes the RCA Report is not litigation work-product. … Discussion The work-product doctrine provides qualified immunity from discovery to certain material prepared by or at the direction of

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • State v. SR

    175 N.J. 23 · Supreme Court of New Jersey · Dec 12, 2002

    Clearly, the phrase means something more than the mere collection of a VCCB penalty from an individual discharged from probation. … all or part of a sentence on intensive community supervision or all or part of a supervised release or parole term on intensive supervised release" are supervised by "a probation officer, a corrections agent, or any other qualified

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • PARKER v. NEW JERSEY MOTOR VEHICLE COMMISSION

    District Court, D. New Jersey · Mar 16, 2023

    “Thus, if the nonmoving party fails ‘to make a showing sufficient to establish the existence of an element essential to that party’s case, . . . there can be no genuine issue of material fact.’” Id. (quoting Katz v. … “To have a property interest in a benefit, a person clearly must have more than an abstract need or desire for it. He must have more than a unilateral expectation of it.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • J.M.S. v. J.W.

    420 N.J. Super. 242 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jun 20, 2011

    Plaintiffs specifically noted that defendants were “clearly ‘family members’ [as] biological relatives of the children’s mother[,]” and that it was “clear that the children were placed with ... … In fact, it is now well-established in New York that “[a] grandparent may seek visitation with a grandchild even after parental rights have been terminated or the child has been freed for adoption.” In re Ann M.C. v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • ATLANTIC CITY MED. CENTER v. Squarrell

    349 N.J. Super. 16 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Feb 22, 2002

    . § 1396 et seq., the federal government is authorized to provide financial support to a state that provides medical assistance to qualified persons. … The summary statements set forth in the Division's decisions were clearly inadequate.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • CUEVAS v. UNITED STATES BUREAU OF PRISONS

    District Court, D. New Jersey · Jul 21, 2020

    App’x at 516 (federal employees may be sued under Bivens in their individual capacities, subject to the qualified immunity defense). … Sept. 30, 2008) (finding an isolated incident of injury to wheelchair-bound prisoner on uneven sidewalk did not establish Eighth Amendment conditions of confinement claim.)

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Raynor v. Raynor

    319 N.J. Super. 591 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Mar 29, 1999

    The court noted, [a] personal injury settlement differs from a custodial or trust account established for the child's education. … Clearly funds set aside for educational purposes should be utilized to defray the parent's obligation.

    Cited 49 timesPublished
  • State v. Candelaria

    311 N.J. Super. 437 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Apr 20, 1998

    HIM AS AN EXPERT AND WITHOUT ESTABLISHING THAT THE SCIENCE, METHODOLOGY OR TECHNIQUE USED BY HIM YIELDS SUFFICIENTLY RELIABLE RESULTS. … There was substantial evidence clearly establishing defendant's guilt in addition to his statements.

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • State v. Maxey

    77 N.J. Super. 397 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Nov 21, 1962

    In Ex parte Pedrini, the California Supreme Court said: "* * * petitioner urges us to declare as law of the state, * * * that once a defendant is sentenced to life imprisonment he is immune from punishment for a further crime … The sentences are clearly provided for in the statute. Yet, on the theory here advanced, it is an impossible sentence. The defendant cannot serve longer than life.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • I/M/O Town of Harrison and Fraternal Order of Police, lodge No. 116

    440 N.J. Super. 268 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Apr 15, 2015

    "The Director of the Division of Pensions and Benefits shall appoint a qualified employee of the division to be secretary of the board. … hereunder shall be headed, directed and supervised by a director, who shall be a person qualified by training and experience to direct the work of such division.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Dunbar Homes, Inc. v. the Zoning Board of Adjustment

    448 N.J. Super. 583 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Feb 14, 2017

    N.J.S.A. 40:55D-3 provides definitions that apply "[f]or the purposes of this act, unless the context clearly indicates a different meaning." … Applying established rules of statutory construction, Twp. of Pennsauken v.

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • State v. Rangel

    422 N.J. Super. 1 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Aug 22, 2011

    The term "physical force," like its companion term "coercion," acts to qualify the nature and character of the "sexual penetration." … Clearly, the statute's inclusion of section (6) renders the phrase "on another" in section (3) ambiguous, at best, thereby requiring resolution "in favor of the defendant."

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • STALLER

    District Court, D. New Jersey · Jan 8, 2026

    The Court cannot enter a judgment against the prison as it is immune from suit in federal court. … Plaintiff thus clearly failed to meet his obligations under the statute, and, absent an exception, his malpractice claims must be dismissed.

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • State of New Jersey v. Ibe Allah-Jr

    New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Aug 14, 2024

    The State Failed To Establish That The Bags Were Abandoned. … Hyman, we also cited to the 1972 Advisory Committee Notes to Federal Rule of Evidence 702 as establishing a sufficiently reliable area of expertise within which a properly qualified expert may provide competent opinion testimony

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • United States Ex Rel. Frantino v. Hatrak

    408 F. Supp. 476 · District Court, D. New Jersey · Feb 19, 1976

    After establishing the corpus delicti, the State presented the testimony of three eye-witnesses and one ear-witness. … Qualified jurors need not, however, be totally ignorant of the facts and issues involved.

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • State v. Birch

    115 N.J. Super. 457 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · Jul 22, 1971

    The case produced the usual disagreement between the admittedly qualified experts as to the damage sustained by defendant. … Clearly, the township would have the right to refuse to accept the dedication and assume the maintenance of the road unless it met certain reasonable standards. Cf. Kligman v. Lautman, 98 N.J. Super. 344 (App.

    Cited 18 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.