Case law

James E. Brown v. Merit Systems Protection Board

19 F.3d 40 · Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · Feb 17, 1994

BROWN, Petitioner, v. MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD, Respondent. No. 93-3453. United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit. Feb. 17, 1994. On Appeal from the Merit Systems Protection Board, in Case No.

Hayes v. Brookwood Hosp.

572 So. 2d 1251 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Dec 14, 1990

Brown v. Wheeler , 437 So.2d 521 , 523 (Ala. 1983). Accord, Starr v. Doctors Hospital , 426 So.2d 826 (Ala. 1983). … Henderson v. Briarcliff Nursing Home, supra; Brown v. Wheeler , 437 So.2d 521 (Ala. 1983); Starr v. Doctors Hosp. , 426 So.2d 826 (Ala. 1983).

Honda R. Brown v. Merit Systems Protection Board

944 F.2d 913 · Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · Aug 13, 1991

BROWN, Petitioner, v. MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD, Respondent. No. 91-3193. United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit. Aug. 13, 1991.

McConnell v. McConnell

151 N.C. App. 622 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Aug 6, 2002

Browning v. Helff, 136 N.C. App. 420, 423 , 524 S.E.2d 95, 97-98 (2000) (citation omitted). … Though plaintiff relies on Brewer v. Brewer, 139 N.C. App. 222 , 533 S.E.2d 541 (2000) and Browning v. Helff, 136 N.C.

Dwight C. Brown v. Merit Systems Protection Board

944 F.2d 913 · Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · Aug 9, 1991

BROWN, Petitioner, v. MERIT SYSTEMS PROTECTION BOARD, Respondent. No. 91-3189. United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit. Aug. 9, 1991.

Board of Education v. Brown

159 Mich. 148 · Michigan Supreme Court · Dec 10, 1909

The petitioner’s fight to condemn is based upon the testimony of one member of its board and other similar testimony. Mr. … Buhl v. Union Depot Co., 98 Mich. 596 ( 57 N. W. 829 , 23 L. R. A. 392). It was admitted and submitted to the jury solely for its bearing upon the question of public necessity. Cases like First Parish in Woburn v.

Gaines v. State

703 So. 2d 1023 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · Jul 3, 1997

“The general rule is that ‘it is not within the power of the court to increase a sentence when punishment has already been suffered under the original sentence.’ ” Brown v.

State of Tennessee v. Toby Lynn Young

Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · Jan 12, 2016

In State v. … See State v. Ducker, 27 S.W.3d 889, 899 (Tenn. 2000). Not every erroneous jury instruction, however, rises to the level of constitutional error. See Miller v.

Board of Education v. Brown

233 N.J. Super. 242 · New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · May 17, 1989

In Georgia v. Suruda, 154 N.J.Super. 439 (Law Div.1977), the court considered the purpose underlying the dates set forth in N.J.S.A. 18A:12-8 for appointment of Board of Education members in cities of the first class. … See N.J.S.A. 18A:12-3; Golaine v.

Gillie v. State

305 Ark. 296 · Supreme Court of Arkansas · Apr 29, 1991

Brown v. State, 304 Ark. 98 , 800 S.W.2d 424 (1990). In this case, the capital felony murder occurred on October 29,1987, at 10:05 p.m. at the Twentieth Century Motel in West Memphis. … Grooms v. State, 293 Ark. 358 , 737 S.W.2d 648 (1987). Affirmed. Newbern and Brown, JJ., concur in part and dissent in part.

Hulme v. Barrett

480 N.W.2d 40 · Supreme Court of Iowa · Jan 22, 1992

Smith v. ADM Feed Corp., 456 N.W.2d 378, 384 (Iowa 1990). … Booker v.

Board of Commissioners v. Brown

28 Ind. 128 · Indiana Supreme Court · May 15, 1867

The board of *129 commissioners of that county, at their June session for 1866, made the following order; “Ordered, that there he, and there is hereby, levied on all property in the county, real and personal, ninety cents … In The Board of Commissioners of Harrison County v.

Talbert v. Brown

7 Vet. App. 352 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Jan 19, 1995

Manio v. Derwinski, 1 Vet.App. 140 (1991). C. … Horowitz v. Brown, 5 Vet.App. 217, 225 (1993); see also Herzog v. Derwinski, 2 Vet.App. 502, 503 (1992); Branham v. Derwinski, 1 Vet.App. 93, 94 (1990); Mokal v. Derwinski, 1 Vet.App. 12, 15 (1990).

Board of Adjustments v. Brown

969 S.W.2d 214 · Court of Appeals of Kentucky · Jun 5, 1998

See also Transitions, Incorporated v. Board of Zoning Adjustment of the City of Ashland, Ky.App., 729 S.W.2d 459 (1987). … Carrithers & Son v.

William E. Freeman v. Eric K. Shinseki

24 Vet. App. 404 · United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · Apr 26, 2011

First, he contends that this case is controlled by Willis v. Brown, 6 Vet.App. 433 (1994). … Lyng v.

Crawford v. Murphy

260 S.C. 411 · Supreme Court of South Carolina · May 7, 1973

The decisions of this Court in Brown v. Weathers, 251 S. C. 67, 160 S. E. (2d) 133 , and Rochester v. Holiday Magic, Inc., 253 S. C. 147, 169 S. … In the Brown v. Weathers case we affirmed the lower court in vacating the default judgment where the summons was sufficiently irregular to confuse the defendant.

Osby v. Reynolds

260 Ill. 576 · Illinois Supreme Court · Dec 17, 1913

To the same effect are Chase v. Palmer, 29 Ill. 306 , Whitaker v. Miller, 83 id. 381 , Mickey v. Barton, 194 id. 446 , and Robinson v. Yetter, 238 id. 320 . This court, however, held in McNab v. … (Forcum v. Brown, 251 Ill. 301 ; Stanley v. Valentine, 79 id. 544.)

Kelley v. METROPOLITAN COUNTY BOARD OF EDUCATION, TENN.

372 F. Supp. 540 · District Court, M.D. Tennessee · Dec 19, 1973

Supreme Court in ‘Swann v. Char *556 lotte-Meeklenburg Board of Education,’ and its companion cases. … Bolling v. Sharpe, 347 U.S. 497 , 74 S.Ct. 693 98 L.Ed. 884 (1954). In the court’s opinion, these federal officials placed the Executive Branch of the federal government in violation of the mandate of Brown v.

Fielder v. King (In Re King)

103 F.3d 17 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Jan 9, 1997

The United States Supreme Court in Brown v. … Wise, 629 F.2d 1049, 1063-64 (5th Cir.1980) (discussing Brown v. Felsen ). Consequently, we cannot affirm based on the reasoning of the bankruptcy court.

Carson Harbor Village, Ltd. v. City of Carson Mobilehome Park Rental Review Board

82 Cal. Rptr. 2d 569 · California Court of Appeal · Feb 24, 1999

The substantial evidence test requires the court to begin with the presumption that the record contains evidence to sustain the board’s findings of fact. (Pescosolido v. … [Citations.]’ ” (Id. at p. 772; see also Fisher v. City of Berkeley, supra, 37 Cal.3d 644 ; Carson Mobilehome Park Owners’ Assn. v. City of Carson, supra, 35 Cal.3d 184 ; Birkenfeld v.