Opinion

Gaines v. State

  • 703 So. 2d 1023
  • 1997 Ala. Crim. App. LEXIS 246
  • 1997 WL 366096
Court
Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama
Filed
Jul 3, 1997
Status
Published
Author
Cobb
On the bench
Cobb
Cited by
2 cases
Authority
More cited than 48.6%

“ ‘[t]he general rule is that “it is not within the power of the court to increase a sentence when punishment has already been suffered under the original sentence,” ’ ” quoting Brown v. State, 376 So.2d 1382, 1385 (Ala.Crim.App.1979)

How later courts described this case

  • “ ‘[t]he general rule is that “it is not within the power of the court to increase a sentence when punishment has already been suffered under the original sentence,” ’ ” quoting Brown v. State, 376 So.2d 1382, 1385 (Ala.Crim.App.1979)

Written by the judges who cited it.

The opinion

COBB, Judge.

Jack Till Gaines’s probation was revoked. At the conclusion of the revocation proceedings, the trial court resentenced Gaines to a more severe punishment than that originally imposed. Gaines appeals from the trial court’s order imposing a more severe sentence.

Gaines was originally sentenced to three years in the penitentiary. This sentence was suspended and Gaines was ordered to serve three years on supervised probation. The trial court, after determining that Gaines had violated the conditions of his probation, sentenced him to five years in the penitentiary. This sentence was split, and he was ordered to serve two years in the penitentiary, followed by four years on supervised probation. “The general rule is that ‘it is not within the power of the court to increase a sentence when punishment has already been suffered under the original sentence.’ ” Brown v. State, 376 So.2d 1382 (Ala.Cr.App.1979) (citations omitted).

The State of Alabama has filed a motion asking us to remand the case, stating that the trial court had inadvertently increased Gaines’s sentence after revoking his probation. The State suggested that the trial court might have jurisdiction to correct the sentence under Rule 29, Ala.R.Crim.P., but requested that we remand the case to preter-mit any possible jurisdictional questions.

This case is remanded for proper sentencing consistent with this opinion. Remand should be made to this court within 49 days from, release of this opinion.

REMANDED WITH INSTRUCTIONS AS TO SENTENCING.

All the Judges concur.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.