Case law

Anderson v. Board of Parole

303 Or. 618 · Oregon Supreme Court · Aug 4, 1987

Petitioner seeks review in this court, alleging that the notice of the action of the Board of Parole (Board) to prisoners does not satisfy ORS 144.135. … The Board’s decision in this and all cases is written on a “Board Action Form” (BAF), which is its “final order.”

Jones v. Board of Parole

350 Or. App. 432 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jun 10, 2026

We review the board’s order for legal error, Morrison v. … Indeed, the board appeared 440 Jones v.

Lopez v. Board of Parole

308 Or. App. 157 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Dec 23, 2020

157 Submitted November 12, affirmed December 23, 2020 LUIS ALEJANDRO LOPEZ, Petitioner, v. … PER CURIAM Affirmed. 158 Lopez v.

Denning v. Board of Parole

325 Or. App. 26 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Mar 29, 2023

The board denied relief noting that the condi- tion was required by ORS 144.102(4)(b)(J) and explaining 28 Denning v. … Mitchell v.

Larsen v. Board of Parole

206 Or. App. 353 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jun 14, 2006

Waddill v. … Guzman v.

Barrett v. Board of Parole

322 Or. App. 751 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Nov 23, 2022

OAR 255-040-0005(5) held invalid. 752 Barrett v. Board of Parole JAMES, P. J. … Forbus v.

Richards v. Board of Parole

339 Or. 176 · Oregon Supreme Court · Aug 18, 2005

See State v. Snyder, 337 Or 410, 416 , 97 P3d 1181 (2004) (right to appeal is statutory); Benton County v. … A BAF is an appealable final order of the board under ORS 144.335(1)(a). Norris v. Board of Parole, 331 Or 194 , 197 & n 2, 13 P3d 104 (2000).

Spratt v. Brown-Petzel Lumber Co.

105 Or. 672 · Oregon Supreme Court · Nov 28, 1922

Plaintiff seeks to foreclose three liens npon logs belonging to defendant, Brown-Petzel Lumber Company. Plaintiff and his assignors, J. W. Krise and R. E. … Clark v. Marsiglia, 1 Denio (N. Y.), 317 ( 43 Am. Dec. 670 ); Stephens v. Howe, 2 Jones & S. (N. Y.) 133; Champion v. Hartshorne, 9 Conn. 564 ; Derby v. Johnson, 21 Vt. 21 .

Bowers v. Board of Parole

309 Or. App. 566 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Mar 3, 2021

Rosenblum, Attorney General, Benjamin Gutman, Solicitor General, and Jacob Brown, Assistant Attorney General, filed the brief for respondent. … See, e.g., State v. K. J.

State Land Board v. Kolovrat

220 Or. 448 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jan 13, 1960

State Land Board v. Rogers, supra. … State Land Board v. Rogers, supra ( 347 P2d at 60 ).

Harris v. Board of Parole

39 Or. App. 913 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Apr 30, 1979

State v. Cooper, 37 Or App 443 , 587 P2d 1051 (1978). … In Sterling v.

Halladay v. Board of Parole

306 Or. App. 136 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Aug 19, 2020

HALLADAY, Petitioner, v. BOARD OF PAROLE AND POST-PRISON SUPERVISION, Respondent. … Board of Parole and Post-Prison Supervision A172740 471 P3d 822 Jeffrey D. Halladay filed the briefs pro se. Ellen F.

Walter v. Board of Education

301 Or. App. 516 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Dec 26, 2019

See State v. … Petitioner contends that, just as the United States Supreme Court considered sociological studies in its opinion in Brown v.

Johnson v. Civil Service Board

161 Or. App. 489 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jul 7, 1999

In Caffey v. … v.

Read v. OREGON MEDICAL BOARD

244 Or. App. 603 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Aug 3, 2011

State v. … See McKay v.

State Land Board v. Brownell

199 Or. 448 · Oregon Supreme Court · Nov 12, 1953

Clark v. Allen, 331 US 503 . … From United States v.

Engweiler v. Board of Parole

340 Or. 361 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 13, 2006

Engweiler v. Board of Parole, 197 Or App 43 , 103 P3d 1201 (2005) (Engweiler IV). We allowed review and now affirm the decision of the Court of Appeals. … Or Laws 2001, ch 661, § 1. 2 In State ex rel Engweiler v. Cook, we affirm the Court of Appeals’ decision in State ex rel Engweiler v.

Brown v. Farmers & Merchants' Nat. Bank

76 Or. 113 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 6, 1915

The advertisement recites the judgment in favor of the bank against Kittie Brown and C. W. Brown, defendants, and the levy-upon “all the right, title and interest that the said Kittie Brown and C. "W. … Brown, is enough in that respect to carry the title of the plaintiff here in the property, and the use of the name “Hattie Brown” does not vitiate the previous sufficient description. .Indeed, in the trial of the case at

Nulph v. Board of Parole

279 Or. App. 652 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jul 27, 2016

Bergerson v. Salem-Keizer School District, 341 Or 401, 411 , 144 P3d 918 (2006) (quoting Springfield Education Assn. v. School Dist., 290 Or 217, 224 , 621 P2d 547 (1980)). … Simplot Co. v.

Brown v. American Mail Line, Ltd.

437 F. Supp. 628 · District Court, D. Oregon · Sep 15, 1977

On the basis of Ryan Stevedoring Co. v. … Swift v. Bolten, 517 F.2d 368 (1975).