Opinion

Halladay v. Board of Parole

  • 306 Or. App. 136
  • 471 P.3d 822
Court
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Filed
Aug 19, 2020
Status
Published
Cited by
0 cases

The opinion

136

Submitted July 2, OAR 255-060-0006(1) and OAR 255-060-0012(1) held valid

August 19, 2020

JEFFREY D. HALLADAY,

Petitioner,

v.

BOARD OF PAROLE AND

POST-PRISON SUPERVISION,

Respondent.

Board of Parole and Post-Prison Supervision

A172740

471 P3d 822

Jeffrey D. Halladay filed the briefs pro se.

Ellen F. Rosenblum, Attorney General, Benjamin Gutman,

Solicitor General, and Jeff J. Payne, Assistant Attorney

General, filed the brief for respondent.

Before Lagesen, Presiding Judge, and James, Judge, and

Kamins, Judge.

PER CURIAM

OAR 255-060-0006(1) and OAR 255-060-0012(1) held

valid.

Cite as 306 Or App 136 (2020) 137

PER CURIAM

Pursuant to ORS 183.400, petitioner challenges

the validity of two rules of the Board of Parole and Post-

Prison Supervision, OAR 255-060-0006(1) and OAR 255-

060-0012(1). Petitioner argues that OAR 255-060-0006(1)

exceeds the statutory authority of the board under ORS

144.280(1)(a) and (b), and that OAR 255-060-0012(1) violates

the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment

to the United States Constitution and ex post facto prohibi-

tions under the state and federal constitutions. We have con-

sidered those challenges and reject them without additional

published discussion.

OAR 255-060-0006(1) and OAR 255-060-0012(1)

held valid.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.