Case law

Brown v. Ward

1 Mo. 209 · Supreme Court of Missouri · May 15, 1822

The principle involved in this case was decided by this Court at Fianklin, in the case of Baily v. Gentry and wife. This judgment is affirmed with costs.

State v. Brown

460 S.W.2d 551 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Dec 14, 1970

The controlling cases, however, are Simmons v. United States, 390 U.S. 377 , 88 S.Ct. 967 , 19 L.Ed.2d 1247 ; Coleman v. … State, Mo., 459 S.W.2d 378 ; State v.

Brown v. Briggs

569 S.W.2d 760 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Apr 25, 1978

Pulliam v. Bond, 406 S.W.2d 635 (Mo.1966); Warren v. Pulitzer Publishing Co., 336 Mo. 184 , 78 S.W.2d 404 (1934); Cash v. Empire Gas Corp., 547 S.W.2d 830 (Mo.App.1976). … The jury awarded the Browns $18,000. See: Brown, et ux. v. Briggs, et ux., 559 S.W.2d 768 (Mo.App.1977).

Brown v. MOCAP, INC.

105 S.W.3d 854 · Missouri Court of Appeals · May 20, 2003

Brown, appeals the decision of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission dismissing his application for review as untimely. … McCuin Phillips v. Clean-Tech, 34 S.W.3d 854, 855 (Mo.App.E.D.2000). The claimant’s failure to file a timely application for review divests the Commission of jurisdiction.

Brown v. State

156 S.W.3d 529 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Mar 1, 2005

Following his conviction by guilty plea to robbery in the second degree, Section 569.030, 1 James Brown filed a pro se Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief. … On this basis, Brown urges the court to reverse and remand for an evidentiary hearing, This court affirms the judgment. Rule 84.16(b). . All statutory references are to RSMo (2000) unless otherwise indicated.

State v. Brown

159 S.W.3d 528 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Apr 12, 2005

Andrew Brown appeals his conviction of one count of the class B felony of distribution of a controlled substance, § 195.211, RSMo 2000.

Brown v. State

153 S.W.3d 925 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Feb 1, 2005

Brown appeals the judgment of the motion court denying his Rule 24.035 motion for postconviction relief following an evidentiary hearing.

Brown v. Wintsch

110 Mo. App. 264 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Dec 19, 1904

Brown as man and wife before they were married and occupied the same room and boarded with her;” that they were living together in adultery and fornication. … In Christal v.

State v. Brown

164 Mo. App. 726 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jun 3, 1912

[Smith v. Railway, 55 Mo. 601 ; Klotz v. Perteet, 101 Mo. 213 , 13 S. W. 955 ; Garth v. Caldwell, 72 Mo. 622 ; Reno v. Fitz Jarrell, 163 Mo. 411 , 63 S. W. 808 ; Roberts v. Jones, 148 Mo. 368 , 49 S. W. 985 .] … S. 1909; State v. Donohue, 139 Mo. App. 639 , 124 S. W. 42 ; State v. Benton, 163 Mo. App. 39 , 145 S. W. 833 .]

Ortwerth v. Brown

149 S.W.3d 543 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Nov 9, 2004

James Ortwerth (“Plaintiff’) and his parents appeal the entry of summary judgment in favor of Frank and Peggy Brown in their action to recover damages for injuries Plaintiff suffered when he was bitten by a dog owned by Richard

State v. Brown

148 S.W.3d 848 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Oct 26, 2004

Arlen Brown appeals the judgment entered upon his conviction by a jury of one count of possession of methamphetamine. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law.

Propst v. Brown

854 S.W.2d 844 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jun 15, 1993

Brawley v. McNary, 811 S.W.2d 362 (Mo. banc 1991) [1]. Deference will be given to the trial court’s ability to judge the credibility of the witnesses. Id.; Rule 73.01(c)(2). … Brown v. Mercantile Bank of Poplar Bluff, 820 S.W.2d 327 (Mo.App.1991) [25-27]. Punitive damages are to be awarded for outrageous conduct, or for a party’s evil motive or reckless indifference to the rights of others.

Brown v. Brewington

513 S.W.2d 768 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Aug 27, 1974

Brown, d/b/a Brown Meat Company, as garnishee. Brown was defendant’s employer at the time of the garnishment. Brown failed to withhold defendant’s wages as required by the garnishment. … Respondent cites Goforth v. Goforth, 301 S.W.2d 877 (Mo. App.1957), as authority for the proposition that an order granting the 90% exemption from garnishment is not an appealable order. Goforth v.

State v. Brown

145 S.W.3d 852 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Oct 5, 2004

Michael Brown appeals the judgment entered by the Circuit Court of St. Louis County following a jury determination of guilt on charges of second degree robbery and felonious restraint.

State v. Brown

683 S.W.2d 316 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Dec 26, 1984

Scott v. Scott, 612 S.W.2d 61, 63 (Mo.App.1981). Where it is impossible or impractical to present only facts to the jury, relevant matters are often presented by opinion. … See Travelers Indemnity Co. v. Woods, 663 S.W.2d 392, 399 (Mo. App.1983); 32 C.J.S. Evidence, § 444, p. 56. Such evidence is often a “matter of necessity or expediency”. 2 Jones on Evidence § 404, p. 752 (5th ed. 1958).

State v. Brown

737 S.W.2d 496 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Sep 22, 1987

State v. Barber, 587 S.W.2d 325, 329 (Mo.App.1979); see also, State v. S.E., 675 S.W.2d 86, 87 (Mo.App.1984). It is not of legal consequence that title to the twelve dollars actually rested in another. … Brown is all that is necessary to meet the requirements of a charge of stealing.

State v. Brown

801 S.W.2d 474 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Dec 7, 1990

State v. Brooks, supra. … In State v.

Brown v. Whitaker

926 S.W.2d 1 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Apr 2, 1996

As the court said in Pinkston v. … Dynacon Builders v. Janowitz, 892 S.W.2d 807, 809 (Mo.App.1995). See also Means v. Sears, Roebuck & Company, 550 S.W.2d 780, 789 (Mo.1977).

Brown v. Campbell

240 Mo. App. 182 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Mar 23, 1949

Bates v. Friedman (Mo. App.) 7 S.W.2d 452 . Dean v. K.C. St. L. and C.R. Co. 199 Mo. 386 , 97 S.W. 910 . Roman v. King (Mo. App.) 268 S.W. 414 . Wright v. Kansas City 187 Mo. 678 , 86 S.W. 452 . Caplin v. St. … In Rolleg v.

Brown v. Conway

598 S.W.2d 549 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Apr 7, 1980

Thomas Brown, Willa’s brother-in-law and husband of Mary Brown, Bryan’s guardian, testified that he knew Charles Johns, Jr., since 1967 when he went to work *551 for General Motors. … In Wren v.