Opinion

Brown v. State

  • 156 S.W.3d 529
  • 2005 Mo. App. LEXIS 338
  • 2005 WL 468702
Court
Missouri Court of Appeals
Filed
Mar 1, 2005
Status
Published
On the bench
Lowenstein, Smart, Smith
Cited by
0 cases

The opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Following his conviction by guilty plea to robbery in the second degree, Section 569.030, 1 James Brown filed a pro se Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief. The court denied the motion without an evidentiary hearing.

Brown appeals the denial of his Rule 24.035 motion for post-conviction relief, al *530 leging that without an evidentiary hearing the court could not determine if appointed counsel complied with Rule 24.035(e) or had instead abandoned him. On this basis, Brown urges the court to reverse and remand for an evidentiary hearing, This court affirms the judgment. Rule 84.16(b).

. All statutory references are to RSMo (2000) unless otherwise indicated.

This is a copy of a public record, reproduced as it was published. It is not legal advice, and it may not be the version a court would rely on. Check the official source before you cite it.

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.