Case law

State v. Thibeault

402 A.2d 445 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · May 25, 1979

People v. Jones, 50 A.D.2d 750 , 376 N.Y.S.2d 155 (1st Dept.1975). See also People v. Brown, 25 N.Y.2d 374, 306 N.Y.S.2d 449 , 254 N.E.2d 755 (1969). … See State v. Liberty, Me., 280 A.2d 805 (1971); State v. Mower, Me., 275 A.2d 584 (1971); Saleme v. Robbins, Me., 270 A.2d 458 (1970). In State v.

State v. Corbin

759 A.2d 727 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Oct 3, 2000

(quoting State v. … Therefore, as in State v.

Waite v. Town of Yarmouth

Superior Court of Maine · Feb 11, 2002

The Board’s findings will not be disturbed if supported by substantial evidence contained in the record. Palesky v. Town of Topsham, 614 A.2d 1307, 1309 (Me. 1992). … Sahl v. Town of York, 2000 ME 180, I 9, 760 A.2d 206, 269, quoting Brooks v.

Allen v. Aroostook Valley Railroad

115 Me. 361 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Nov 6, 1916

construction of a false lining on the bottom and sides with a six inch air space for circulation, • the. placing of a stove in the center between the doors, with the stove pipe passing horizontally through a tern *363 porary fire board … Parker v. Portland Pub. Co., 69 Maine, 173; Dixon v. Swift, 98 Maine, 207; Stanwood v. Clancy, 106 Maine, 72; Elie v. St. Ry. Co., 112 Maine, 178. This is the contention of the defendant.

Hume v. Limington

Superior Court of Maine · Jun 3, 2003

On February 12, 2002 I issued an order and decision in Libby v. Town of Limington, AP-01-042 where standing was the “central issue”. … The case of Laverty v.

Reed v. Avian Farms, Inc.

941 F. Supp. 10 · District Court, D. Maine · Sep 30, 1996

Just recently in Li v. C.N. Brown Co., 645 A.2d 606 (Me.1994), the Law Court held that intentional torts fall within the exclusivity and immunity provisions of the Act. Id. at 608 . … In an earlier case, Knox v. Combined Ins.

State v. McKeen

977 A.2d 382 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Aug 11, 2009

The federal statute at issue in Hilton allows the Coast Guard to board any vessel at any time to examine its papers and documents, and to search the vessel and ask questions of those on board. 619 F.2d at 130-31 . … In a case upholding a similar federal statute, United States v.

Chasteen v. Town of China

Superior Court of Maine · Apr 30, 2003

Yates v. Town of Southwest Harbor, ’ The original appeal asked for the court’s review of the decision of the China Board of Appeals in this matter. … Valente v. City of Westbrook, 543 A.2d at 1375; Cunningham v.

Thornton v. U. S. Insurance

12 Me. 150 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Apr 15, 1835

Boardman, 4 Mass. 548 ; Clarke v. United Insurance Company, 7 Mass. 365; Spafford v. Dodge, 14 Mass. 74 ; Walden v. Le Roy, 2 Caines, 263 ; Barker v. Phœnix Insurance Company, 8 Johns. 307 ; Dunham v. Com. Ins. … This is the principle decided in Strong v. The New York Fireman Insurance Company, 11 Johns. 323 , and Depau v. The Ocean Insurance Company, 5 Cowen, 63.

State v. Milliken

985 A.2d 1152 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jan 7, 2010

See Bundy v. Wilson, 815 F.2d 125, 135-36 (1st Cir.1987); Bransford v. Brown, 806 F.2d 83, 85-86 (6th Cir.1986); see also United States v. … State v.

Cushing v. State

434 A.2d 486 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Aug 24, 1981

Brown, Kay R. H. Evans, Asst. Attys. Gen., Augusta, for defendants. Before WERNICK, GODFREY, NICHOLS and ROBERTS, JJ. ROBERTS, Justice. … See Brown v. Bishop, 105 Me. 272, 277 , 74 A. 724, 727 (1909); Walker v. Lincoln, 45 Me. 67, 70 (1858); Small v. Small, 35 Me. 400, 401 (1853).

United States v. Martin

26 F. Cas. 1179 · District Court, D. Maine · Jun 15, 1868

Law, §§ 249-255; Lightfoot v. Tenant, 1 Bos. & P. 551; Langton v. Hughes, 1 Maule & S. 593. It has however been acknowledged and fully recognized by Curtis, J., in Sortwell v. … Biggs v. Lawrence, 3 Durn. & E. [Term R.] 454; Clugas v. Penaluna, 4 Durn. & E. [Term R.] 466; Waymell v. Reed, 5 Durn. & E. [Term R.] 599. The present case, in my view, is wholly different from Holman v.

Lewin v. Skehan

39 A.3d 58 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Mar 13, 2012

White v. … See Corcoran, 2011 ME 14, ¶ 16 , 12 A.3d 71 ; Weiss v. Brown, 1997 ME 57, ¶ 6 , 691 A.2d 1208 .

Pelletier v. Dwyer

334 A.2d 867 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Apr 2, 1975

See Appleton v. Chase, 19 Me. 74, 78 (1841); Brown v. Gammon, 14 Me. 276, 280 (1837); 3 American Law of Property § 11.44 (A. J. Casner ed. 1952); 7 S. Williston, Contracts § 924, at 762 (3d ed. 1963). … Warren v. Wheeler, 21 Me. 484, 490-91 (1842); Babb v. Kennedy, 19 Me. 267, 268-69 (1841); see Hill v. Hobart, 16 Me. 164, 170 (1839).

Fitzpatrick v. Town of Falmouth

879 A.2d 21 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Aug 10, 2005

We recognize that in Ingraham v. … Montalvo v. Radcliffe, 167 F.3d 873, 876-77 (4th Cir.1999).

Caron v. Maine School Administrative District No. 27

594 A.2d 560 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 18, 1991

No. 1 v. … See Stone v. Board of Registration in Medicine, 503 A.2d 222, 226 (Me.1986).

Senator Corp. v. Commissioner of Transportation

511 A.2d 37 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 2, 1986

State v. National Advertising Co., 409 A.2d 1277, 1289 (Me.1979). The removal of this sign would do nothing of the kind. The bill *39 board occupies a tiny fraction of Senator’s whole parcel. … Shackford & Gooch Co. v. Town of Kennebunk, 486 A.2d 102, 106 (Me.1984); Roberts v. Maine Bonding & Cas. Co., 404 A.2d 238, 241 (Me.1979). That essential element is lacking here.

Leonard v. Town of Winthrop

Superior Court of Maine · Sep 24, 2004

The court is not permitted to “make findings independent of those explicitly or implicitly found by the Board or [to] substitute its judgment for that of the Board.” Perrin v. … Total Quality v. Town of Scarborough, 588 A.2d 283, 284 (Me. 1991). Plaintiffs advance four principal arguments for vacating the decision of the Winthrop Board.

Windward Development v. Cummings Road Business Park Association

Superior Court of Maine · Nov 14, 2005

Defendants argue, citing Town of Orrin~ton - v. Pease, 660 A.2d 919, 922 (Me. 1995) and Plannin~Board of Town of Naples v. … However, defendant has offered no Maine authority for the proposition that such deference is required and, in the court's view, Boehner v.

Boudreau v. Town of Princeton

611 A.2d 78 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 21, 1992

authorization which the court was construing was granted at a special Town meeting on April 11, 1988, when the inhabitants of Princeton voted in favor of Article 37 of a warrant: To see if the Town will vote to authorize the Board … Clarke v. Fall River, 219 Mass. 580, 586 , 107 N.E. 419 (1914).