Case law

Cleveland v. City of Portland

Superior Court of Maine · Aug 22, 2018

Town of Levant v. Seymour, 2004 ME 115, , 13, 855 A.2d 1169, citing Levesque v. Town ofEliot, 448 A.2d 876, 878 (Me. 1982). … In Town if Freeport v.

Lewin v. Skehan

39 A.3d 58 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Mar 13, 2012

White v. … See Corcoran, 2011 ME 14, ¶ 16 , 12 A.3d 71 ; Weiss v. Brown, 1997 ME 57, ¶ 6 , 691 A.2d 1208 .

Hughes Bros., Inc. v. Town of Eddington

Superior Court of Maine · Feb 7, 2015

Underwood v. City ofPresque Isle, 715 A.2<1 148 (Me. 1998). V. … Minster v. Town o/Grny, 584 A.2d 646, 649 (quoting Tlsei v. Town ofOgunquit, 491 A.2d 564, 569 (Me. I985).

Gerald York v. Day's, Inc.

153 Me. 441 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Apr 17, 1958

Pratt v. Cloutier, 119 Me. 203, 206 ; Robinson v. Warren, 129 Me. 172, 175 . See, also, Maddox v. Brown, 71 Me. 432 (1880) of the “horse and buggy” era. … .----” Haggett v. Hurley, 91 Me. 542, 553 . “In Palmer v.

Maine Ass'n of Independent Neighborhoods (M.A.I.N.) v. Commissioner, Maine Department of Human Services

697 F. Supp. 557 · District Court, D. Maine · Aug 30, 1988

See Franchise Tax Board v. … See Warth v.

Talbot v. Copeland

38 Me. 333 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 1, 1854

Brown v. Gray; 3 Greenl. 126; Mosher v. Berry, 30 Maine, 83. By the plan of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts, made by Rufus Putnam, and dated 1186, the north-east corner of. … Loring v. Norton, 8 Greenl. 61.

Hume v. Limington

Superior Court of Maine · Jun 3, 2003

On February 12, 2002 I issued an order and decision in Libby v. Town of Limington, AP-01-042 where standing was the “central issue”. … The case of Laverty v.

Hurley v. Towne

155 Me. 433 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Nov 23, 1959

.---” Brown v. Rhodes (1927), 126 Me. 186, 187 . “---A general demurrer admits all facts well pleaded, and challenges their sufficiency in law upon which to maintain the action. … In Dunbar v.

Rodrigue v. Rodrigue

694 A.2d 924 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · May 8, 1997

In Black v. … Thompson v.

Waskiewicz v. Town of Kennebunkport

Superior Court of Maine · May 7, 2004

WASKIEWICZ, Plaintiff ORDER GOiscn PoP v. … In Fitanides v.

Widewaters Stillwater Co., LLC. v. City of Bangor

Superior Court of Maine · May 31, 2001

Pride's Corner Concerned Citizens Ass'n v. Westbrook Board of Zoning Appeals, 398 A.2d 415, 416 n.1 (Me. 1979). … Irish v. Gimbel, 1997 ME 50, 7 6, 691 A.2d 664, 669.

Mitchell v. Nutter

161 F. Supp. 799 · District Court, D. Maine · Apr 28, 1958

Tobin v. Edward S. Wagner Co., 2 Cir., 1951, 187 F. 2d 977 ; Walling v. Freidlin, D.C.M.D. Pa.1946, 66 F.Supp. 710 ; Walling v. Wolff, D.C.E.D.N.Y.1945, 63 F.Supp. 605 ; Fleming v. … Fleming v.

Inhabitants of Howland v. County Commissioners

49 Me. 143 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 1, 1861

The petitioners’ counsel have cited Commonwealth v. … But, on this point, we refer to Inhabitants of Monterey v.

Moreau v. Zayre Corp.

408 A.2d 1289 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Dec 17, 1979

Id.; see, e.g., Abshire v. City of Rockland, Me., 388 A.2d 512, 514-15 (1978) (“special errand” exception); Brown v. Palmer Construction Co., Me., 295 A.2d 263, 266 (1972) (“traveling employee” exception); Sargent v. … Clark Associates Ltd. v.

Leonard v. Town of Winthrop

Superior Court of Maine · Sep 24, 2004

The court is not permitted to “make findings independent of those explicitly or implicitly found by the Board or [to] substitute its judgment for that of the Board.” Perrin v. … Total Quality v. Town of Scarborough, 588 A.2d 283, 284 (Me. 1991). Plaintiffs advance four principal arguments for vacating the decision of the Winthrop Board.

Grover v. Minette-Mills, Inc.

638 A.2d 712 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Mar 9, 1994

Brown Co. v. Gillen, 569 A.2d 1206, 1210 (Me.1990). At trial, Grover conceded that there was no intimidation and thus was required to establish that the defendants procured the breach through fraud. … V.

Compagnie Du Port De Rio De Janeiro v. Mead Morrison Mfg. Co.

19 F.2d 163 · District Court, D. Maine · Apr 14, 1927

A board is constituted, consisting of three experts, one chosen by each party and the third selected by the judge from names submitted by the parties, which proceeds at once to investigate the cause of the accident and make … Ed. 71 ], People’s Tobacco Co. v. American Tobacco Co., 246 U. S. 79 [ 38 S. Ct. 233 , 62 L. Ed. 587 , Ann. Cas. 1918C, 537], and Rosenberg Bros. & Co. v. Curtis Brown Co., 260 U. S. 516 [ 43 S. Ct. 170 , 67 L.

Maine Merchants Association, Inc. v. Campbell

287 A.2d 430 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Feb 16, 1972

Palmer v. Barker, 11 Me. 338 (1834). Since the purpose of the statute was abundantly clear, our Court felt compelled to construe the word “team” to include an automobile. Bragdon v. … Brown. This event was noticed by plaintiffs and an order of substitution was appropriately entered pursuant to the provisions of Rule 26(d) (1) Maine Rules of Civil Procedure. 3 .

Gilman v. Gilman

52 Me. 165 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 1, 1863

And, in Munroe v. … Bernal v. Bernal, 3 Mylne & Craig, 555, note. In the case of Somerville v.

Albert's Case

142 Me. 33 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Feb 7, 1946

Burnham & Morrill Co., supra, Drouin v. Snodgrass, supra and McNiff v. … She said that when she went to get something under the sink in her home she put her right hand on the board there and fell.