Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

Filters1908

10,000+ results

1.61s

  • Wilbur Barnes v. Tony Wright

    449 F.3d 709 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jun 2, 2006

    Qualified Immunity “[T]he Supreme Court [has] held that ‘government officials performing discretionary functions generally are shielded from liability for civil damages insofar as their conduct does not violate clearly established … Second, we consider whether the violation involved a clearly established constitutional right of which a reasonable person would have known.

    Cited 216 timesPublished
  • George Mitchell v. State of Washington

    818 F.3d 436 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Mar 14, 2016

    Qualified Immunity — Clearly Established Despite the fact that we hold that the violation of a constitutional right occurred, Dr. … Bell is entitled to qualified immunity if it was not “clearly established” that his actions would violate Mitchell’s constitutional rights. 7 Pearson, 555 U.S. at 232 , 129 S.Ct. 808 . At the time of Dr.

    Cited 210 timesPublished
  • KOSHNICK v. LYNOTT

    District Court, D. New Jersey · Oct 15, 2021

    Judicial immunity was established to permit judges to render decisions “with independence and without fear of consequences.” Pierson v. … App’x 645 (3d Cir. 2005) (“The § 1983 qualified immunity analysis applies equally to claims brought against public officials under § 1985; if an official is immune from suit under § 1983, that official also is immunized

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Frank Snider, III v. Matthew Peters

    752 F.3d 1149 · Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · May 30, 2014

    Qualified immunity shields government officials from liability and the burdens of litigation in a § 1983 action unless the official's conduct violates a clearly established constitutional or statutory right of which a reasonable … ; and (2) the right was clearly established at the time of the deprivation."

    Cited 121 timesPublished
  • Cindy Laine Franklin v. Chris Curry

    738 F.3d 1246 · Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · Dec 23, 2013

    DISCUSSION Qualified immunity shields government officials acting within their discretionary authority from liability unless the officials “violate clearly established statutory or constitutional rights of which … Thus, to evaluate their entitlement to qualified immunity, we ask whether Franklin has alleged a violation of a constitutional right and, if so, whether the constitutional right violated was clearly established at the

    Cited 195 timesPublished
  • Frohmader v. Wayne

    766 F. Supp. 909 · District Court, D. Colorado · Jun 7, 1991

    Once a defendant raises a qualified immunity defense, the plaintiff assumes the burden of showing that the defendant has violated clearly established law. Hannula, 907 F.2d at 131 . … The principles of qualified immunity entitle Wayne to summary judgment on the ground that, in light of the clearly established law governing the use of force, he could, as a matter of law, reasonably have believed that his

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Leonel Buenrostro v. Pablo Collazo, A/K/A Pablo Collazo Marrero

    973 F.2d 39 · Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · Aug 26, 1992

    Hence, state officials exercising discretionary authority are entitled to qualified immunity insofar as their conduct does not transgress clearly established constitutional or federal statutory rights of which a reasonably … The next step is to ascertain whether the right at issue was “clearly established” at the time of infringement. See Anderson, 483 U.S. at 640 , 107 S.Ct. at 3039 .

    Cited 93 timesPublished
  • Graham v. Gray

    827 F.2d 679 · Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · Sep 1, 1987

    established law.” … violation of clearly established law, a defendant pleading qualified immunity is entitled to dismissal before the commencement of discovery.”

    Cited 12 timesPublished
  • Lintz v. Skipski

    807 F. Supp. 1299 · District Court, W.D. Michigan · Nov 25, 1992

    However, the qualified immunity doctrine shields government officials performing discretionary functions from civil damages liability provided their conduct “does not violate clearly established statutory or constitutional … Skipski violated a clearly established constitutional right. Therefore, her motion will be granted based upon the doctrine of qualified immunity.

    Cited 22 timesPublished
  • Moore v. Evans

    124 N.C. App. 35 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Oct 15, 1996

    Generally, qualified immunity protects public officials from personal liability for performing discretionary functions to the extent that such conduct “ ‘does not violate clearly established statutory or constitutional rights … In order to establish the existence of an official’s right to the defense of qualified immunity, one must (1) identify the specific right allegedly violated; (2) determine whether that right was clearly established; and (

    Cited 55 timesPublished
  • Shaw v. Villanueva

    918 F.3d 414 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Mar 11, 2019

    III Villanueva and Ebrom argue that since the court granted Phillips and Morin qualified immunity, they should be immune too. … , Shaw has not appealed Phillips' qualified immunity.

    Cited 125 timesPublished
  • Estate of D.E.; D.E., individually by and through his mother, Christine Erickson; Christine Erickson, individually; and I.E., a minor, by and through her mother, Christine Erickson v. West Virginia Department of Health and Human Resources; Jeffery M. Pack; and Jennifer L. Raper, individually and in her capacity as an employee/agent of West Virginia Department of Health and Human Resources

    Intermediate Court of Appeals of West Virginia · Nov 4, 2024

    to a good faith report of child abuse or neglect; and both are entitled to qualified immunity because there is no allegation that they violated a clearly established 3 law … “[I]t is well- established that matters involving qualified immunity, such as the case presently before us, require a type of ‘heightened pleading’ standard.” W. Virginia Reg'l Jail & Corr. Facility Auth. v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Maria S. v. Garza

    912 F.3d 778 · Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · Jan 4, 2019

    The qualified immunity analysis has two prongs: (1) whether the facts, taken in the light most favorable to the plaintiffs, demonstrate that an officer violated a federal right and (2) whether the right was clearly established … The district court correctly awarded qualified immunity. For the foregoing reasons, we AFFIRM the district court's grant of qualified immunity. Agent Garza does not recall being told this.

    Cited 23 timesPublished
  • Vincent v. City of Sulphur

    28 F. Supp. 3d 651 · District Court, W.D. Louisiana · Oct 21, 2014

    In order to overcome a claim of qualified immunity, a plaintiff must plead facts showing “(1) that the official violated a statutory or constitutional right, and (2) that the right was ‘clearly established’ at the time of … Was the Right Clearly Established?

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Al-Mustafa Irshad v. Spann

    543 F. Supp. 922 · District Court, E.D. Virginia · Jul 19, 1982

    The defendants also raise the qualified immunity of Procunier v. Navarette, 434 U.S. 555 , 98 S.Ct. 855 , 55 L.Ed.2d 24 (1978), as a ground for dismissal. … Fitzgerald,U.S. -,-, 102 S.Ct. 2727, 2735-2738 , 73 L.Ed.2d 396 (1982) (eliminates subjective component of good-faith immunity). This federal immunity defense clearly does not violate due process.

    Cited 20 timesPublished
  • Carico v. Benton, Ireland, & Stovall

    68 F. App'x 632 · Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · Jun 26, 2003

    Qualified Immunity Qualified immunity is an affirmative defense that shields government officials “from liability for civil damages insofar as their conduct does not violate clearly established statutory or constitutional … clearly established.

    Cited 40 timesPublished
  • Pierce v. Ohio Department of Rehabilitation & Corrections

    284 F. Supp. 2d 811 · District Court, N.D. Ohio · Aug 28, 2003

    Of course, the qualified immunity inquiry asks whether the constitutional right advocated by the plaintiff is clearly established, not whether a defendant’s conduct is not clearly established. … The test for whether a right is clearly established was set out by the Supreme Court: “[C]learly established rights, for purpose of qualified immunity, are ‘clearly established statutory or constitutional rights of which

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Clark v. Coleman

    District Court, W.D. Virginia · Mar 24, 2020

    To evaluate qualified immunity claims, the Fourth Circuit has adopted a two-step analysis: (1) Whether a clearly established right has been violated, and (2) whether a reasonable person in the officer’s position “would … Nev. 2018) (“And because it is clearly established that a citizen has the First Amendment right to criticize officers, even with profanity, Dennett is not entitled to qualified immunity on this claim.”).

    Cited 0 timesUnknown
  • Jon Frudden v. Kayann Pilling

    877 F.3d 821 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Dec 11, 2017

    Clearly Established Law We apply a two-part analysis in qualified immunity cases. Pauluk v. Savage, 836 F.3d 1117, 1121 (9th Cir. 2016). … A right is clearly established for purposes of qualified immunity only where 22 FRUDDEN V.

    Cited 69 timesPublished
  • Lawny Lamar Browning v. Richard A. Vernon, Director Ron McKinsey

    44 F.3d 818 · Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · Jan 10, 1995

    Vernon and McKinsey contend that they are entitled to qualified immunity from damages because the allegations in the complaint do not constitute violations of a clearly established liberty interest protected by the Due Process … clearly established?

    Cited 42 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.