Case law

State Ex Rel. Rohrer v. Credle

322 N.C. 522 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 30, 1988

Phillips Petroleum Co. v. Mississippi, — U.S. —, 98 L.Ed. 2d 877 ; Barney v. Keokuk, 94 U.S. 324 , 24 L.Ed. 224 (1877). In Illinois Cent. R.R. v. … State Board of Agriculture, North Carolina and its Resources, Shellfish, at 151-52 (1896).

M.B. v. CHAPEL HILL-CARRBORO CITY SCHOOLS BOARD OF EDUCATION

District Court, M.D. North Carolina · Sep 27, 2021

(“Title IX”) against Defendant School Board. (Id. ¶¶ 40–54.) … Jackson County Board of Education to argue that failure to adequately respond to allegations of sexual misconduct may constitute IIED. (ECF No. 27 at 7 (citing Smith v. Jackson Cty.

State v. . Ballance

229 N.C. 764 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 4, 1949

such applicant, and if an applicant shall fail to satisfy the Board in any or all of these respects, the Board may decline to admit said applicant to examination, or to issue license." … may offend the undefined ethical standards of the Board.

Lane v. Griswold

273 N.C. 18 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Feb 28, 1968

Lane v. Alexander Brown Griswold, et al., Case No. 446, Fall Term 1967, Case No. 442, Spring Term 1968, was argued, the opinion in which was filed this day. … Lane v. Alexander Brown Griswold, et al., Case No. 446, Fall Term 1967, and Case No. 442, Spring Term 1968, which was filed this day.

Petticord v. Heefner

263 N.C. 139 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 16, 1964

The factual situation in this case is similar to that in Browning v. … Therefore, the judgment entered below is reversed on authority of the Browning case, and the case is remanded for further proceedings in accord with that opinion. Reversed and remanded for further proceedings.

Ingram v. NC State Bd. of Plumbing, Heating

Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Feb 4, 2020

10 -  INGRAM V. … The Board is expressly authorized - 11 -  INGRAM V. N.C. STATE BD.

Bigley v. Lombardo

90 N.C. App. 79 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · May 3, 1988

The Ross Realty and Chemical Bank analysis, however, conflicted with the rationale of an earlier Supreme Court decision, Brown v. Kirkpatrick, 217 N.C. 486 , 8 S.E. 2d 601 (1940). … The court “expressly rejected] the reasoning of Brown”; however, it noted that the result in Brown might be correct since the deed of trust “was not a ‘purchase-money deed of trust under G.S. 45-21.38.’ Childers v.

Hinson v. Britt

232 N.C. 379 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 20, 1950

Jordan v. Harris, 225 N.C. 763 , 36 S.E. 2d 270 . … Scott v. Bryan, 210 N.C. 478 , 187 S.E. 756 ; Pemberton v. Greensboro, 205 N.C. 599 , 172 S.E. 196 ; 5 C.J.S., Appeal and Error, section 1689. Affirmed.

Stacy v. Merrill

191 N.C. App. 131 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jun 17, 2008

An action against a commission or board created by statute as an agency of the State where the interest or rights of the State are directly affected is in fact an action against the State. Meyer v. … The Board is a local board of education as defined in N.C. Gen. Stat. § 115C-5(5) (2007). N.C. Gen.

Cook v. UNION ZONING BD. OF ADJUSTMENT

649 S.E.2d 458 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Sep 4, 2007

"[A]ny person aggrieved" has standing to appeal the decision of a board of *466 adjustment pursuant to N.C. Gen.Stat. § 153A-345(b) (2003). See Lloyd v. … Heery v. Zoning Board of Adjustment, 61 N.C.App. 612, 613 , 300 S.E.2d 869, 870 (1983) (internal citations and quotations omitted).

Marriott v. Chatham County

187 N.C. App. 491 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Dec 4, 2007

Defendants-appellees (defendants) are Chatham County, members of the Chatham County Board of Commissioners (Commissioners), and members of the Chatham County Planning Board (Planning Board). … Person v. Board of State Tax Com’rs, 184 N.C. 499, 503 , 115 S.E. 336, 339 (1922). The adoption of minimum criteria by Chatham County constitutes a legislative function.

City of Asheville v. Aly

233 N.C. App. 620 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · May 6, 2014

While the Civil Service Act — as originally enacted — did not provide a mechanism for judicial review of the Board’s decisions, Jacobs v. City of Asheville, 137 N.C. … Koufman v.

Stratford v. City of Greensboro

124 N.C. 127 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 7, 1899

Domain, section 238; Boom v. Patterson, 98 U. S., 403 ; Broadnax v. Groom, 64 N. C., 244 ; Vaughan v. Commissioners, 117 N. C., 434. … In Baltimore v.

Hughes v. Anchor Enterprises, Inc.

245 N.C. 131 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 12, 1956

See also, Cab Co. v. Casualty Co., 219 N.C. 788 , 15 S.E. 2d 295 . Brogden, J., in Brown v. … Hence, the theory on which Brown v. Wood, supra, was decided, has no application here. In Barber v. R.

Sullivan v. Smith

56 N.C. App. 525 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Apr 6, 1982

Clark v. Bodycombe, 289 N.C. 246 , 221 S.E. 2d 506 (1976); Horton v. Insurance Co., 9 N.C. App. 140 , 175 S.E. 2d 725 (1970); see also Dickinson v. Pake, 284 N.C. 576 , 201 S.E. 2d 897 (1974); Ridge v. Grimes, 53 N.C. … He relies primarily on Brown v. Louisburg, 126 N.C. 701 , 36 S.E. 166 (1900). Brown is in apposite, and the argument is without merit.

Abbott Realty Co. v. City of Charlotte

198 N.C. 564 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 9, 1930

the board of commissioners, or reduced to writing and approved by the board, or expressly authorized by ordinance or resolution adopted by the board. … McPhail v. Commissioners, 119 N. C., 330 , 25 S. E., 958 . There was error in the judgment dismissing the action as of nonsuit. The judgment must be Eeversed.

Johnson v. Pearce

148 N.C. App. 199 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Dec 28, 2001

Brown v. Hurley, 124 N.C. App. 377, 380 , 477 S.E.2d 234, 237 (1996). … Carrier, 214 N.C. 191, 195 , 198 S.E. 619, 621 (1938) (quoting 30 C.J. 1156); see also Brown, 124 N.C. App. at 380 , 477 S.E.2d at 237 ; Cannon v. Miller, 71 N.C.

Q.C. v. WINSTON-SALEM/FORSYTH COUNTY SCHOOLS BOARD OF EDUCATION

District Court, M.D. North Carolina · May 26, 2022

Alexander v. Choate, 469 U.S. 287, 295 (1985). … Contractors of Am. v.

ANDREWS EX REL. ANDREWS v. Haygood

188 N.C. App. 244 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jan 15, 2008

Champion Fibre Co. v. Cozad, 183 N.C. 600, 607 , 112 S.E. 810, 813 (1922) (quoting Board of Sup'rs of Carroll Co. v. U.S., 18 Wall. 71 , 85 U.S. 71 , 21 L.Ed. 771 (1873)). … See Zimmerman v.

State v. Drake

31 N.C. App. 187 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Oct 20, 1976

O’Berry v. Perry, supra; Keener v. Beal, 246 N.C. 247 , 98 S.E. 2d 19 (1957) ; Wright v. Holt, 18 N.C. App. 661 , 197 S.E. 2d 811 (1973), cert. denied, 283 N.C. 759 , 198 S.E. 2d 729 (1973) ; Brown v. … O’Berry v. Perry, supra; Smith v. Brown, 102 Cal. App. 477 , 283 P. 132 (1929).