Case law

Herrick v. Theberge

474 A.2d 870 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Apr 11, 1984

See Ingalls v. Brown, 460 A.2d 1379, 1381 (Me.1983); Mechanics’ Savings Bank v. Bridges, 450 A.2d 904, 904 (Me.1982). The attorney’s affidavit contains no information stemming from his personal knowledge. … Harmon v. Emerson, 425 A.2d 978, 981 (Me.1981) (quoting Jacobs v. Boomer, 267 A.2d 376, 379 (Me.1970)).

Berman v. Griggs

145 Me. 258 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Aug 4, 1950

We said in Frye v. E. … Allen et al. v. Goodnow et al., 71 Me. 425 . In Holt v.

Duncan v. Robbins

159 Me. 339 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Aug 8, 1963

State v. Furbush, 72 Me. 493, 496 ; Whiting v. Burger, 78 Me. 287, 295 ; Waterville Realty Corp. v. Eastport, 136 Me. 309, 315 ; Higgins v. Carr Brothers Co., 138 Me. 264, 271 . … Lane v. Brown, — U. S. —, 9 L. ed. (2nd) 892 was also decided, March 18, 1963. We quote the authentic head note 1 from 9 L. ed. (2nd) 892, 893: “1.

Hall v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.

436 A.2d 863 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Oct 29, 1981

Brown v. State, Department of Manpower Affairs, Me., 426 A.2d 880, 886 (1981). We have examined Hall’s other arguments and find them to be without merit. The entry is: Judgment affirmed. All concurring. . … We have dealt with such a problem under 24 M.R.S.A. § 2903 in Dougherty v.

Pearson v. Aroostook County Patrons Mutual Fire Insurance

149 Me. 313 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Nov 6, 1953

Co. of New York v. … Co. v. Baker (1952), 254 S.

Chase v. Town of York

Superior Court of Maine · Oct 16, 2002

AP-01-062 PAF-YoRrR- 5 /ofavoe MARY V. CHASE, Plaintiff/ Appellant ORDER —- DONALD L. SANSRECH: v. … MARY V. CHASE, Plaintiff/ Appellant -. ORDER FOLLOWING Vv. REMAND . DONALD L.

Randall v. Town of Harrison, Maine

Superior Court of Maine · Jun 9, 2004

Carroll v. … Seider v. Board of Exam'rs of Psychologists, 1998 ME 78, 15, 710 A.2d 890, 892.

O'Connell v. Bar Harbor Bd. of Appeals

Superior Court of Maine · May 6, 2010

In Salisbury v. … In Moore v. Town of Bar Harbor, 2009 Me. Unpub.

Inhabitants of the Town of Easton v. Glick

Superior Court of Maine · Jan 3, 2017

Vienna v. Kokernak, 612 A.2d 870, 872 (Me. I 992). … Yusem v. Town of Raymoncl, 200 l ME 61, ~ 8.

Neptune Line, Inc. v. Stone & Cooper

34 F.2d 226 · District Court, D. Maine · Oct 2, 1926

In Merritt v. Sprague (D. C.) 191 F. 627 , I found the dock clearly unsafe. A boulder was discovered at the point where the injured vessel rested. In Philadelphia & R. R. Co. v. Walker (D. … In Smith v. Havemeyer (D. C.) 32 F. 844 , Judge Addison Brown had before him a ease in which the libelant’s vessel was injured by a spike projecting from a beam in the wharf.

Washburn & Doughty v. Pottle

Superior Court of Maine · Nov 6, 2007

McPherson Timberlands, Inc. v. Unemployment Ins. Comm'n, 1998 ME 177,<][ 6,714 A.2d 818, 820. … Town of Ogunquit v. 2 At the time of appeal 39-A M.R.S.A. § 360(3) read in pertinent part: 3. Appeal.

Petrin v. Town of Scarborough

Superior Court of Maine · Feb 18, 2015

The court must affirm the decision of the [Board] unless that decision was unlawful, arbitrary, capricious, or unreasonable." Driscoll v. Gheewalla, 441 A.2d 1025, 1026 (Me. 1982). … Moser v.

Cassat v. Town of Scarborough

Superior Court of Maine · Jun 29, 2012

The court does "not make any findings other than those found explicitly or implicitly by the Board" and does "not substitute [its] judgment for that of the Board." Camp v. … Further, "[a] demonstration that no competent evidence supports the local board's findings is required in order to vacate the board's decision." Thacker v. Konover Dev.

Diamond International Corp. v. Sullivan & Merritt, Inc.

493 A.2d 1043 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jun 6, 1985

In Roberts v. … Brown v. Prime Construction Co., Inc., 102 Wash.2d 235 , 684 P.2d 73, 75 (1984).

LaRose v. City of Biddeford

Superior Court of Maine · Aug 29, 2003

AP-02-053 SIMONE LAROSE, ) ) Plaintiff ) Tort tae “yo > -~=-BECISIGON AND ORDER v. ) ) THE CITY OF BIDDEFORD, and ) PETER E. PETIT and KIMN. … Because the Board’s findings and conclusion fail to meet these standards, this matter must be remanded to the Board. See Chapel Road Associates, L.L.C. v.

Cairns v. Town of Gorham

Superior Court of Maine · Oct 28, 2002

DISCUSSION A decision of the Board of Appeals is reviewed for an error of law, abuse of discretion, or findings of fact not supported by substantial evidence in the record. Yates v. … ~ review only the record established before the Board in order to determine whether the standards have been met. Sahl v. Town of York, 2000 ME 180, J 11, 760 A.2d 266, 269.

Bernier v. Town of Litchfield

Superior Court of Maine · Mar 10, 2004

Ryan v. Town of Camden, 582 A.2d 973, 975 (Me. 1990). “The board’s decision is not wrong because the record is inconsistent or a different conclusion could be drawn from it.” Twigg v. … Barnard v. Zoning Board of Appeals of the Town of Yarmouth, 313 A.2d 741, 749 (Me. 1974). However, this does not help in determining the Board’s intent.

Broadcast Music, Inc. v. Larkin

672 F. Supp. 531 · District Court, D. Maine · Oct 20, 1987

See Warner Bros., Inc. v. … “Brown Eyed Girl,” by Van Morrision; 6. “Oh Pretty Woman,” by Roy Orbison and Bill Dees; 7. “Something,” by George Harrison; 8. “The South’s Gonna Do It,” by Charlie Daniels; and 9.

Irving v. Thomas

18 Me. 418 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jun 15, 1841

Leakins v. Clissel, 1 Lev. 102; Lysney v. Selby, 2d Ld. Ray. 1118; Bowring v. Stevens, 2 C. & P. 337; Cross v. Peters, 1 Greenl. 389. … The cases of Percival v. Blake, and Cash v.

Bisbing v. Town of Cumberland

Superior Court of Maine · Jun 21, 2010

BIsbmg v. Town of Cumberland, AP-10-8 (Supenor Ct. … Another decision held that a decision by the Waterboro Board of Appeals that a gravel pit retained its grandfathered status was also advisory and not subject to appeal. Herrle v.