Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

FiltersDC

10,000+ results

1.86s

  • Munawar v. Tibbs

    981 A.2d 584 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Sep 17, 2009

    Brown. The language at the top of the first page of the deed, as provided by the Recorder’s office, indicates that the VA sold the deed to “Mary L. Brown, unmarried.” … BROWN FRANKLIN TIBBS When recorded mail to: MARY L. BROWN FRANKLIN TIBBS 527 16th Street, NE Apt # 1 Washington, DC 20002 Approximately ten years later, in March 1999, Mary L. Brown married Mohammad Munawar.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Nunnally v. District of Columbia

    243 F. Supp. 3d 55 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 22, 2017

    Allen-Brown v. District of Columbia, 174 F. Supp. 3d 463, 481 (D.D.C. 2016) (internal quotation marks omitted). … Brown v. Brody, 199 F.3d 446, 458-59 (D.C. Cir. 1999) (internal quotation marks omitted), abrogated on other grounds by Burlington N. & Santa Fe Ry. Co. v. White, 548 U.S. 53 (2006).

    Cited 13 timesPublished
  • S. Simcha Goldman v. Secretary of Defense

    734 F.2d 1531 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Aug 10, 1984

    Brown v. Glines, 444 U.S. at 353-58 , 100 S.Ct. at 598-01 (upholding different Air Force regulations). … Unlike the states in Wisconsin v. Yoder, Thomas v. Review Board, and Sherbert v.

    Cited 13 timesPublished
  • In Re Shearin

    764 A.2d 774 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Dec 28, 2000

    Cratty v. United States, 82 U.S.App. D.C. 236, 243, 163 F.2d 844, 851 (1947); George v. United States, 75 U.S.App.D.C. 197, 200 , 125 F.2d 559, 562 (1942); LoSacco v. … George Washington Univ. v. Waas, 648 A.2d 178 , 182 n. 6 (D.C.1994) (citations omitted); see also Bliss v. Bliss, 733 A.2d 954 , 960 n. 13 (D.C.1999).

    Cited 33 timesPublished
  • Local Union No. 636, United Association of Journeymen & Apprentices of Plumbing & Pipefitting Industry v. National Labor Relations Board

    430 F.2d 906 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jul 29, 1970

    Moreover, the Board’s application of the “right to control” test completely ignores the teaching of the Supreme Court in National Woodwork Manufacturers Ass’n v. … See Beacon Castle Square Building Corp. v. NLRB, 1 Cir., 406 F.2d 188 , 192 n. 10 (1969) . See also Danielson v. Painters District Council No. 20, etc., S.D.N.Y., 305 F.Supp. 1108, 1113-1117 (1969) ; Rotenberg v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • United States v. Saro, Carlos

    252 F.3d 449 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 12, 2001

    In United States v. … In Slack v.

    Cited 44 timesPublished
  • West End Citizens Ass'n v. D.C. Zoning Commission

    District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Aug 22, 2024

    Wheatley v. D.C. Zoning Comm’n, 229 A.3d 754, 758 (D.C. 2020). This court reverses the Commission’s 3 Pursuant to D.C. Code § 6-641.07, “all meetings of the Board shall be open to the public. … Ass’n v. D.C. Bd. of Zoning Adjustment, 605 A.2d 22, 38 (D.C. 1992) (citing Lamont v. Rogers, 479 A.2d 1274, 1278 (D.C. 1984)); see Price v. D.C.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • McRae v. Hyman

    667 A.2d 1356 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Dec 7, 1995

    See Davis v. Henderson, 652 A.2d 634 (D.C.1995); White v. Hyman, 647 A.2d 1175 (D.C.1994). … See Greenholtz v.

    Cited 30 timesPublished
  • Kickapoo Tribe of Indians v. Babbitt

    827 F. Supp. 37 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 13, 1993

    Kansas v. Finney, 251 Kan. 559 , 836 P.2d 1169 . While that suit was pending, Asst. Secy. Brown returned the Tribal-State compact on February 28, 1992, stating that the compact was in violation of IGRA as to one. point. … Brown, 334 F.Supp. 536 (D.Neb.1971) (validity of retrocession legislation approved in violation of Nebraska constitution a federal question); Omaha Tribe of Nebraska v.

    Reversed on other grounds by Kickapoo Tribe of Indians of the Kickapoo Reservation in Kansas v. Bruce Babbitt, in His Official Capacity as Secretary of the Interior, 43 F.3d 1491 (1995)Cited 13 timesPublished
  • Park v. Brahmbhatt

    District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Aug 13, 2020

    The question is not whether Mr. 40 Mohler v. Houston, 356 A.2d 646, 647 (D.C. 1976). 41 Id. (quoting Brown v. Shimabukuro, 118 F.2d 17, 18 (D.C. Cir. 1941)). … See George Washington Univ. v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Washington v. White

    231 F. Supp. 2d 71 · District Court, District of Columbia · Oct 22, 2002

    Although Brown had instructed Ms. … Brown v. Brody, 199 F.3d 446, 457 (D.C.Cir.1999).

    Cited 29 timesPublished
  • Alexander v. Federal Bureau of Investigation

    198 F.R.D. 306 · District Court, District of Columbia · Dec 13, 2000

    Coastal States Gas Corp. v. … In Upjohn Co. v.

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • Kegley v. District of Columbia

    440 A.2d 1013 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Feb 16, 1982

    Jones v. Police and Firemen’s Retirement and Relief Board, D.C.App., 375 A.2d 1 (1977). … [Clark’s Liquors, Inc. v. Alcoholic Beverage Control Board, D.C.App., 274 A.2d 414, 418 (1971), quoting in part from Securities and Exchange Commission v.

    Cited 43 timesPublished
  • McGrath v. Rice

    District Court, District of Columbia · Dec 11, 2009

    Wunder was serious about trying to terminate” him based on his refusal (. . . continued) criticism of an employee constitutes an adverse employment action, Brown v. Brody, 199 F.3d 446, 458 (D.C. … See Brown v. Brody, 199 F.3d 446, 458 (D.C.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Lindner v. District of Columbia

    32 A.2d 540 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Mar 29, 1943

    See Security National Bank v. Young, 8 Cir., 55 E.2d 610, 84 A.L.R. 100 , certiorari denied 286 U.S. 551 , 52 S.Ct. 502 , 76 L.Ed. 1287 ; Ward v. Board of County Com’rs of Love County, 253 U.S. 17 , 40 S.Ct. 419 , 04 L. … Tumulty v. District of Columbia, 69 App.D.C. 390, 400 , 102 F.2d 254, 264 . See, also, Powder River Cattle Co. v. Board of Commissioners, C.C., 45 E. 323, cited in Panitz v. District of Columbia, 72 App.

    Cited 12 timesPublished
  • In Re Roundtree

    467 A.2d 143 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Sep 19, 1983

    E.g., Crane v. Hahlo, 258 U.S. 142 , 42 S.Ct. 214 , 66 L.Ed. 514 (1922); Sill v. Pennsylvania State University, 462 F.2d 463 (3d Cir.1972). … Quaglino, 88 Cal.App.3d 542 , 152 Cal.Rptr. 47 (1979); Kurtenbach v. TeKippe, 260 N.W.2d 53 (Iowa 1977); Crest Investment Trust, Inc. v. Comstock, 23 Md.

    Cited 27 timesPublished
  • Matter of Fogel

    422 A.2d 966 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Aug 1, 1980

    While punishment is not the purpose of a disciplinary proceeding, see, e. g., District of Columbia Bar v. … Kelley v. Morris, D.C.App., 400 A.2d 1045 (1979). [2] The Hearing Committee, looking for guidance, had asked Assistant Bar Counsel to provide it with a summary of relevant prior disciplinary actions.

    Cited 23 timesPublished
  • Boone v. Mountainmade Foundation

    64 F. Supp. 3d 216 · District Court, District of Columbia · Aug 20, 2014

    Pardo-Kronemann v. Donovan, 601 F.3d 599, 607 (D.C. Cir. 2010) (citing Brown v. Brody, 199 F.3d 446, 455-56 (D.C. Cir. 1999)). … Barker’s report to the board. See Halasa v. ITT Educ.

    Cited 12 timesPublished
  • Schlottman v. Solis

    District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 27, 2012

    See Bowa’en v. Um`ted States, 106 F.3d 433, 437 (D.C. Cir. l997) (citing Brown v. Gen. Servs. Aa’min., 425 U.S. 820, 832-33 (1976)). … Newcastle v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Lewis v. Pension Benefit Guaranty Corp.

    314 F. Supp. 3d 135 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 11, 2018

    Mem. at 12 (quoting Brown v. Cont'l Airlines, Inc. , 647 F.3d 221 , 226 (5th Cir. 2011) ), and that the Court should not apply the two-step process the Supreme Court adopted in Chevron U.S.A., Inc. v. … ."); Davis v. PBGC , 864 F.Supp.2d at 155 ("[T]he Court will apply Chevron deference to those claims in which [the p]laintiffs challenge [the] PBGC's interpretations of ambiguous ERISA provisions."); Brown v.

    Cited 8 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.