Case law

FRIENDSHIP EDISON PUBLIC v. Smith Ex Rel. LS

429 F. Supp. 2d 195 · District Court, District of Columbia · May 5, 2006

Brown & Associates, PLLC, Carol Elaine Burroughs, Office of the Attorney General, Washington, DC, for Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION LAMBERTH, District Judge. … Board of Education. The District "has no authority to direct, rescind, overrule, modify, or alter the substantive decision of any hearing officer." Hyde Leadership Pub. Charter Sch. v.

Bentt v. District of Columbia Department of Employment Services

979 A.2d 1226 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Sep 10, 2009

In our earlier opinion, Georgetown University v. … Ctr. v.

Brosnahan v. Eckerd

435 F. Supp. 26 · District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 1, 1977

The Government argues that under Brown v. … Brown v. GSA, 96 S.Ct. at 1968 (quoting Preiser v, Rodriguez, 411 U.S. 475, 489-490 , 93 S.Ct. 1827 , 36 L.Ed.2d 439 (1973)).

Davis v. Paulson

District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 22, 2021

DAVIS, SR., et al., ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. … DATE: June 22, 2021 Ketanji Brown Jackson KETANJI BROWN JACKSON United States Circuit Judge

Neal, James H. v. DC

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Dec 16, 1997

Wald, Circuit Judge: This is a companion case to Brown v. Plaut, No. 96-7027 (D.C. Cir. Dec. 16, 1997). … See Brown, slip op. at 12.

Pro-Col Corporation v. Commissioner of Patents

436 F.2d 296 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Nov 25, 1970

E.g., Hays v. Brenner, 123 U.S.App.D.C. 96 , 98, 357 F.2d 287, 289 (1966). This presumption of validity is reinforced where, as here, the District Court has sustained the Patent Office’s action. Zenith Radio Corp. v. … Hays v. Brenner, supra, 123 U.S.App.D.C. at 98, 357 F.2d at 289 ; Zenith Radio Corp. v. Ladd, supra, 114 U.S.App.D.C. at 57 , 310 F.2d at 862 .

Truck Drivers, Oil Drivers, Filling Station and Platform Workers Local No. 705 v. National Labor Relations Board

509 F.2d 425 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Nov 19, 1974

Newberry Co. v. NLRB, 442 F.2d 987, 901 (2d Cir. 1971). But even a single remark may have the implication, in context, of a threat that the Board may condemn. NLRB v. … In NLRB v.

United Wholesale and Warehouse Employees, Local 261, Retail, Wholesale and Department Store Union, Afl-Cio v. National Labor Relations Board

282 F.2d 824 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jul 7, 1960

Local 1976 United Brotherhood of Carpenters, etc. v. National Labor Relations Board, 1958, 357 U.S. 93, 98 , 78 S.Ct. 1011, 1015 , 2 L.Ed.2d 1186 , reversing in part General Drivers, ete. v. … National Labor Relations Board v. International Rice Milling Co., 1951, 341 U.S. 665, 670, 671 , 71 S.Ct. 961, 964 , 95 L.Ed. 1277 .

Van Allen v. United States Department of Veterans Affairs

925 F. Supp. 2d 119 · District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 28, 2013

Instead, appellate review of such decisions proceeds from “the Board of Veterans’ Appeals, then to the Court of Appeals for Veterans’ Claims, to the Federal Circuit, and ultimately to the Supreme Court.” Thomas v. … See Beamon v. Brown, 125 F.3d 965, 970 (6th Cir. 1997). Additionally, “[u]nder 5 U.S.C. § 701(a)(1), the APA does not waive sovereign immunity when statutes preclude judicial review,” as § 511 explicitly does. Id.

Air Transport Ass'n of America v. Department of Transportation

900 F.2d 369 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Apr 13, 1990

Chrysler Corp. v. Brown, 441 U.S. 281, 316 , 99 S.Ct. 1705, 1725 , 60 L.Ed.2d 208 (1979). … Brown, 441 U.S. at 316 , 99 S.Ct. at 1725 .

Rodriguez v. Shulman

844 F. Supp. 2d 1 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Feb 21, 2012

This immunity has traditionally been extended to members of boards of law examiners or of boards that have the power to revoke attorneys’ licenses. See, e.g., Simons v. … Kaempfer v. Brown, 872 F.2d 496 , 496 (D.C.Cir.1989). Failing to follow these steps can lead to the injunction being vacated. See, e.g., Richardson v. District of Columbia, 2008 WL 2396186 , at *1 (D.C.Cir.

General Radio Co. v. Watson

188 F. Supp. 879 · District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 12, 1960

The Board of Appeals (hereinafter referred to as the Board) on June 18, 1956, affirmed the examiner’s refusal of claim 34, the single claim before this Court, and which reads as follows: “34. … than copper to the brush track, and brush' track only — that portion of the wire which was bared for contact with the brush — it might be possible to prevent this destructive cycle. ****** “ * * * We had thought that the brown

Shaw v. Esper

District Court, District of Columbia · Jan 31, 2023

See Lujan v. Defs. of Wildlife, 504 U.S. 555, 561 (1992). A 12(b)(6) motion to dismiss is designed to “test[] the legal sufficiency of a complaint.” Browning v. Clinton, 292 F.3d 235, 242 (D.C. Cir. 2002). … See Rodriguez, 857 F.3d at 906 (“district courts have routinely reviewed those board decisions in the first instance.”); see also, e.g., McKinney v. Wormuth, 5 F.4th 42 (D.C. Cir. 2021); Kidwell v.

Winters v. United States Agency for International Development

District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 29, 2016

ATC Petroleum, 860 F.2d at 1111, quoting Int’l Org. of Masters, Mates & Pilots v. Brown, 698 F.2d 536, 551 (D.C. Cir. 1983). … And even a mixed- case appeal to the Board must comply with filing deadlines. See Schlottman v. Solis, 845 F.

George A. Parker, Successor Testamentary Trustee to Archibald S. Pinkett, of the Estate of W. H. C. Brown v. Mildred Banks

331 F.2d 806 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Apr 2, 1964

George Parker, successor testamentary trustee under the will of one Brown, was removed from office by the District Court at the instance of the United States which had been allowed to intervene as parens patriae and successor

Cna Financial Corporation v. Raymond J. Donovan, Secretary of Labor

830 F.2d 1132 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Sep 29, 1987

Chrysler Corp. v. Schlesinger, 565 F.2d 1172, 1186 (3d Cir.1977), vacated and remanded sub nom. Chrysler Corp. v. Brown, supra note 1. 53 . Goland v. … See Chrysler Corp. v. Brown, supra note 1, 441 U.S. at 317 , 99 S.Ct. at 1725 , 60 L.Ed.2d at 234 . 148 . See Citizens to Preserve Overton Park v.

Associated Press v. National Labor Relations Board, Wire Service Guild, Local 222, the News-Paper Guild, Afl-Cio-Clc, Intervenor. Noel M. Yancey v. National Labor Relations Board, the Associated Press, Intervenor

492 F.2d 662 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Feb 20, 1974

P 14,325 ASSOCIATED PRESS, Petitioner v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent, Wire Service Guild, Local 222, The News-paper Guild, AFL-CIO-CLC, Intervenor. Noel M. YANCEY, Petitioner v. … Auburn Rubber Co., 10 Cir., 384 F.2d 1 (1967); Ramsey v. NLRB, supra note 1, 327 F.2d 784 . See also language favorable to the Spielberg policy in NLRB v.

Bowman v. United States

267 F. 648 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 2, 1920

Com. v. Horton, 2 Gray (Mass.) 354 . In Burge v. United States, 26 App. D. … In Funk v. United States, 16 App. D.

Calderon-Lopez v. Berryhill

District Court, District of Columbia · May 25, 2021

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ) RICARDO JOSE CALDERON-LOPEZ, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. … DATE: May 25, 2021 Ketanji Brown Jackson KETANJI BROWN JACKSON United States District Judge 1 Pursuant

Ogden v. District of Columbia

676 F. Supp. 324 · District Court, District of Columbia · Nov 25, 1987

In United States v. … Franks v.