Case law

Storey v. City of Sparta Police Department

667 F. Supp. 1164 · District Court, M.D. Tennessee · May 26, 1987

United States Postal Service Board of Governors v. Aikens, 460 U.S. 711, 716 , 103 S.Ct. 1478, 1482 , 75 L.Ed.2d 403 (1983). … In Wooten v.

Estate of Haynes v. Braden

835 S.W.2d 19 · Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Feb 25, 1992

Petty v. Sloan, 197 Tenn 630, 277 S.W.2d 355 , (1955). See Jackson v. Miller, 776 S.W.2d 115 , (Tenn.App.1989). In Lowry v. Lowry, 541 S.W.2d 128 (Tenn.1976), quoting from Iacometti v. … See also Littlejohn v. Fowler, 45 Tenn. (5 Cold) 284, (1868); and Brown v. Brown, 45 Tenn.App. 78 , 320 S.W.2d 721 , (1959). The language of Lowry is plain and forceful.

Landers v. Jones

872 S.W.2d 674 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Feb 23, 1994

Brown v. Brown, 155 Tenn. 530 , 296 S.W. 356 (1927). Subject matter jurisdiction relates to the nature of the cause of action and the relief sought and is conferred by the sovereign authority which organizes the court. … Dixie Savings Stores, Inc. v. Turner, 767 S.W.2d 408, 410 (Tenn.App.1988); Tennessee Dept. of Human Services v.

Nollner v. Southern Baptist Convention, Inc.

852 F. Supp. 2d 986 · District Court, M.D. Tennessee · Apr 3, 2012

Defendants Global Enterprise Services, LLC (“GES”) and the International Mission Board of the Southern Baptist Convention, Inc. … Co. v. Zenith Radio Corp., 475 U.S. 574, 587 , 106 S.Ct. 1348 , 89 L.Ed.2d 538 (1986); Brown v. United States, 583 F.3d 916, 919 (6th Cir. 2009). .

Randall C. Hagy v. Commisssioner, Tennessee Department of Labor and Workforce Development and Tennessee Distribution, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Tennessee · May 26, 2004

Nixon v. McCanless, 141 S.W.2d 885 (Tenn. 1940). The Board’s action was reasonable, and was supported by the evidence. … Commissioner of Transportation v. Medicine Bird Black Bear White Eagle, 63 S.W.3d 734 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2001). In this case, the Board correctly applied the applicable law to plaintiff’s claim.

Darnell v. State

123 Tenn. 663 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Dec 15, 1910

The contention is based upon the following: The act is entitled “An act to create a board of jury commissioners for counties in this State having a population of not less than 20,292, and not more than 20,400 inhabitants … the provisions of this act will apply to all grand and petit juries in circuit and criminal courts of this State.” .The same question was decided against plaintiff in error’s contention in the case of *666 Allie Damron v.

HICKS, CLIFFORD MONTRELL v. FULLEN DOCK AND WAREHOUSE

2024 TN WC 61 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Aug 28, 2024

Code Ann. § 50-6-239(c)(6) (2023); McCord v. Advantage Human Resourcing, 2015 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 6, at *7-8, 9 (Mar. 27, 2015). … However, the Appeals Board held that an employee’s “subjective belief, no matter how sincerely held, is not a sufficient basis to support his claim for workers’ compensation benefits.” Rucker v.

Davidson County v. Harmon

200 Tenn. 575 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Jul 20, 1956

Keith v. Funding Board, 127 Tenn. 441, 464 , 155 S.W. 142 , Ann.Cas. 1914B, 1145; Mayor & Aldermen of Morristown v. Hamblen County, 136 Tenn. 242, 246 , 188 S.W. 796 ; Quinton v. … Board of Claims, 165 Tenn. 201 , 54 S.W.2d 953 ; Automobile Sales Co. v. Johnson, 174 Tenn. 38 , 122 S.W.2d 453 , 120 A.L.R. 370 , and American Can Co. v. McCanless, 183 Tenn. 491, 501 , 193 S.W.2d 86 . In the Keith v.

Sweatt v. Bd. of Paroles

Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Oct 12, 2000

SWEATT v. TENNESSEE BOARD OF PAROLES, ET AL. … In Arnold v.

Simns, Sam v. The Pictsweet Company

2025 TN WC App. 61 · Tennessee Workers' Compensation Appeals Board · Dec 16, 2025

TENNESSEE BUREAU OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION WORKERS’ COMPENSATION APPEALS BOARD Sam M. … Rye v. Women’s Care Ctr. of Memphis, MPLLC, 477 S.W.3d 235, 265 (Tenn. 2015).

Crigger v. Coca-Cola Bottling Co.

132 Tenn. 545 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Apr 15, 1915

Dec., 339 (negligence in sale of unwholesome provisions, but holding that vendor is bound to know that they are sound and wholesome); Craft v. Parker (Mich.), 21 L. R. A., 139; note; Brown v. … However exacting the duty or high the degree of care to furnish pure foods, beverages, and medicines, we believe with Judg’e Cooley, as expressed in Brown v.

John D. Cooke, III v. Tennessee Department of Correction

Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Feb 4, 2005

It does not provide a remedy as to the correctness of the decision of the Board, because the intrinsic correctness of the decision is not subject to judicial review. Powell v. … Parole Eligibility Review Board, 879 S.W.2d 871 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1994). The power of the writ is restricted to a determination of whether the Board exceeded its jurisdiction or is acting illegally. Yokley v.

Kellogg Co. v. Tennessee Assessment Appeals Commission

978 S.W.2d 946 · Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Jun 26, 1998

Tidwell v. Collins, 522 S.W.2d 674 (Tenn. 1975). … In Sherwood Co. v.

Anderson v. Smith

521 S.W.2d 787 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Mar 10, 1975

See also Huff v. Department of Highways, 3 Tenn.App. 277 (1926); Ragland v. Davidson County Board of Education, 203 Tenn. 317 , 312 S.W.2d 855 (1958). *790 T.C.A. … Davidson County Board of Education, 203 Tenn. 317 , 312 S.W.2d 855 (1958), in upholding the right of the Board of Education to take a nonsuit after the board of appraisers had returned their report and the board had authorized

BOYZO, JESUS ARROYO v. SOL CONSTRUCTION

2026 TN WC 13 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Feb 24, 2026

Hodges v. Tenn. Att’y Gen., 43 S.W.3d 918, 921 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2000). Still, dismissal is normally appropriate only where there has been a “clear record of delay or contumacious conduct.”2 Shahrdar v. … The Court Clerk will prepare the record for submission to the Appeals Board, and you will receive notice once it has been submitted.

State of Tenn. v. Herrington

626 F. Supp. 1345 · District Court, M.D. Tennessee · Feb 5, 1986

See, e.g., Brown v. Ferro Corp., 763 F.2d 798, 801 (6th Cir.) cert. denied, — U.S.-, 106 S.Ct. 344 , 88 L.Ed.2d 291 (1985); Johnson v. Sikes, 730 F.2d 644, 648 (11th Cir, 1984). … Atwell v. Merit Systems Protection Board, 670 F.2d 272, 286 (D.C.Cir.1981).

Transportation-Communication Employees Union v. Harriman & Northeastern Railroad

270 F. Supp. 582 · District Court, E.D. Tennessee · Mar 30, 1967

Again we note the conclusiveness accorded the Board’s findings and order. The matter of the effect to be accorded the amendments in pending cases came up in Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen et al. v. … Carpenter v. Wabash Ry., 309 U.S. 23, 26, 27 , 60 S.Ct. 416 , 84 L.Ed. 558 . See also Hines v. Davidowitz, 312 U.S. 52 , 61 S.Ct. 399 , 85 L.Ed. 581 ; American Foundries v.

William (Bob) Simerly v. City of Elizabethton

Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Jan 5, 2011

See Anderson v. Standard Register Co., 857 S.W.2d 555, 559 (Tenn. 1993). In Hannan v. … Quoting City of Nashville v.

George v. Belk

101 Tenn. 625 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Jan 25, 1899

Pr., Sec. 947; Brown v. Dean, 123 Mass., 254 ; Nick-elson v. Smith, 15 Or., 200 ; Warren v. N. Y. Cent. R. R., 52 N. Y., 437 ; Johnson v. Rider, 84 Iowa, 50 ; Smith v. Meldron, 107 Pa. St., 348; Roat v. … Sherwood, 6 John., 68 ; Blackley v. Sheldon, 7 John., 32 ; Gardnin v. Appleton, 22 Maine, 453; Rogers v. Sample, 28 Neb., 141 .

Deaton v. Tennessee Coal & Railroad

59 Tenn. 650 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Dec 15, 1874

was in reality capable of a full and bona fide performance within the year, without the intervention of. extraordinary circumstances, then it is to be considered as not within the statute. 3 Parsons on Confer., 35; Leinau v. … Brown on Erauds, sec. 282.