Case law

Smist v. Bd. of Trustees for the Maine Pub. Employee Retirement Sys.

Superior Court of Maine · May 18, 2009

(quoting Hale-Rice v. Me. State Ret. … Steele v. Me. Pub. Empls. Ret. Sys., 2008 Me. Unpub. LEXIS 169 (Me. 2008). There is substantial evidence in the record now before the Court to support the Board's conclusions.

Bisbing v. Town of Cumberland

Superior Court of Maine · Jun 21, 2010

BIsbmg v. Town of Cumberland, AP-10-8 (Supenor Ct. … Another decision held that a decision by the Waterboro Board of Appeals that a gravel pit retained its grandfathered status was also advisory and not subject to appeal. Herrle v.

Ouellette v. The Maine Pub. Employees Retirement Sys.

Superior Court of Maine · Sep 15, 2008

Co. v. Maine Unemployment Ins. Comm'n, 544 A.2d 728, 732 (Me. 1988). … The Board has responsibility for the proper operation of the Retirement System and for making the Act effective as well as formulating policy and supervising the Act. See Huard v. Bd. of Trs., Maine State Ret.

Cooke v. Naylor

573 A.2d 376 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Apr 13, 1990

In State v. … See State v.

Fitanides v. Lambert

Superior Court of Maine · Mar 10, 2004

Senders v. Town of Columbia Falls, 647 A.2d 93, 94 (Me. 1994); Grant’s Farm Assoc. Inc. v. Town of Kittery, 554 A.2d 799, 801 (Me. 1989). … The board’s decision will be affirmed unless it is unlawful, arbitrary, capricious, or unreasonable. Senders v. Town of Columbia Falls, 647 A.2d at 94.

Parisi v. Town of Deer Isle

Superior Court of Maine · Nov 4, 2004

Gorham v. Town of Cape Elizabeth, 625 A.2d 898, 902 (Me. 1993). Here, Parisi makes two distinct arguments that the Planning Board proceeding was affected by bias. … See Rockland Plaza Realty v. City of Rockland, 2001 ME 81, §§ 6, 25-37 (Alexander, J., dissenting), 772 A.2d 256, 258-59, 262-266; see also Malonson v.

Willis v. Town of York

Superior Court of Maine · Sep 22, 2006

Also see Rockland Plaza Realty Corp. v. … Also see Southridge Coy. v. Board of Environmental Protection, 655 A.2d 345, 348 (Me. 1995). The entries are: The decision of the York Harbor Board in AP-04-81 is reversed.

Waterhouse v. Town of Kennebunk

Superior Court of Maine · Oct 26, 2004

Town of Southwest Harbor v. Harwood, 2000 ME 213, {l 6, 763 A.2d 115, 117. “Substantial evidence is ‘evidence that a reasonable mind would accept as sufficient to support a conclusion.” York v. … Findings of a board of review will not be overturned “unless the record compels a contrary finding.” Northeast Empire v. Town of Ashland, 2003 ME 28, { 9, 818 A.2d 1021, 1024 (citing Yusem v.

Richards v. Maine Benefit Ass'n

85 Me. 99 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Nov 7, 1892

Bolton v. Bolton, 73 Maine, 299. … Dennis v. Mass. Ben. Asso. 120 N. Y. supra ; Crossman v. Same, 143 Mass. 435 .

Estate of Sweet

519 A.2d 1260 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jan 6, 1987

Sweet took all the documents, including the memorandum, put them in a brown manila envelope and placed them in her safety deposit box. … Whicker v. Abbott, 449 A.2d 353, 355 (Me.1982); Thaxter v. Fry, 222 A.2d 686, 690 (Me.1966). The court correctly determined that Mrs.

Lane Constr. Corp. v. Town of Washington

Superior Court of Maine · Mar 31, 2005

The court is not permitted to “make findings independent of those explicitly or implicitly found by the board or [to] substitute its judgment for that of the board.” Perrin v. … See Stewart v. Town of Sedgwick, 2000 ME 157, { 4, 757 A.2d 773, 775. If, however, the board acted only in an appellate capacity, the court reviews directly the decision of the planning board, not the board of appeals.

Yerdon v. Towery Publishing, Inc.

749 F. Supp. 319 · District Court, D. Maine · Oct 26, 1990

The disputed language must be examined, however, in the context of the entire agreement, Cocke County Board of Highway Comm’rs v. … Newport Utilities Board, 690 S.W.2d 231, 237 (Tenn.1985), and the contract must be construed so that all clauses will be in harmony if such a construction is possible. Bartlett v. Philip-Carey Mfg.

Dupere v. Liberty Mutual Fire Insurance

377 F. Supp. 2d 272 · District Court, D. Maine · Jul 1, 2005

Navarro v. Pfizer Corp., 261 F.3d 90, 93-94 (1st Cir.2001) (quoting McCarthy v. Northwest Airlines, Inc., 56 F.3d 313, 315 (1st Cir.1995)). … Browning Ferris Indus., 160 F.3d 839, 841-42 (1st Cir.1998) (quoting Nat’l Amusements, Inc. v. Town of Dedham, 43 F.3d 731, 735 (1st Cir.1995)). III. Discussion Plaintiff asserts that the $100,000 he received from Mr.

Concerned Citizens of Gorham Inc. v. Town of Gorham

Superior Court of Maine · Sep 2, 2008

In contrast, factual determinations made by a local planning board will only be overturned if they are not adequately supported by evidence in the record. Jordan v. … Just because a different conclusion could be drawn from the record does not justify overturning a planning board's decision if there is evidence in the record that could support the board's determination. Twigg v.

In Re Kristy Y.

752 A.2d 166 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · May 25, 2000

See Webb v. … Balian v. Board of Licensure in Medicine, 1999 ME 8, ¶ 10 , 722 A.2d 364, 367 (quoting Mathews v.

Jackson v. Borkowski

627 A.2d 1010 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 8, 1993

See Sanderford v. Prudential Ins. … Richards v. Soucy, 610 A.2d 268, 270 (Me.1992); see Hall v. Board of Envtl. Protection, 498 A.2d 260, 267 (Me.1985).

Conover v. Conover

403 A.2d 352 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 3, 1979

Boulay v. Boulay, Me., 393 A.2d 1339, 1340 (1978). … Hawke v. Hawke, Me., 395 A.2d 449, 451 (1978). 7 . There was also testimony that, to the date of the divorce hearing, Mr. Conover had paid $4,439.87 as attorney’s fees and $2,500.00 for room and board.

Buckley v. Page

4 F. Cas. 569 · U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Maine · Oct 15, 1860

Knight v. Norton, 15 Me. 337 ; Neil v. Ford, 21 Me. 440 . Prior to the first-named case, it had been held in Agry v. … Colby v. Moody, 19 Me. 111 ; Brown v. Watson, Id. 452.

KEENAN

District Court, D. Maine · Mar 31, 2026

Aug. 19, 2016) (allowing a § 1983 claim to proceed based on a no trespass order that was formally voted on by the select board); Bernstein v. Sims, 643 F. … Louis v.

Inhabs. of the Town of Levant v. Seymour

Superior Court of Maine · Jun 10, 2003

Banks v. Maine RSA # 1, 1998 ME 272, 7 4, 721 A.2d 655, 657. … See generally Yates v. Town of Southwest Harbor, 2001 ME 2, 1 11-14, 763 A.2d 1168, 1171-72; Salisbury v.