Case law

Stewart v. Ashcroft

211 F. Supp. 2d 166 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 25, 2002

Circuit in Brown v. Brody, another case involving the denial of a lateral transfer, for disparate treatment based on race discrimination. Brown, 199 F.3d at 452 . … Brown, 199 F.3d at 457 (emphasis added); see also Freedman v. MCI Telecomm. Corp., 255 F.3d 840, 844 (D.C.Cir.2001).

Grant v. United States

402 A.2d 405 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · May 15, 1979

He further testified that he had not known the car was not Brown’s. … Taylor v.

Wilkerson v. United States

432 A.2d 730 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jun 10, 1981

In Brown v. … See, e, g., Brown v. Texas, 443 U.S. 47 , 99 S.Ct. 2637 , 61 L.Ed.2d 357 (1979). . In United States v.

Johnson v. Johnson

179 A.2d 720 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Apr 13, 1962

Lutz v. Lutz, D.C.Mun.App., 166 A.2d 489 . 2 . Schreiber v. Schreiber, D.C.Mun.App., 139 A.2d 278 . 3 .Brown v. Brown, 74 App.D.C. 309 , 122 P.2d 219 .

Weaver v. United States Information Agency

87 F.3d 1429 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jul 9, 1996

A second type of test first appeared in the Supreme Court’s decision in Brown v. … Brown, 444 U.S. at 354, 355 , 100 S.Ct. at 599, 600 ; see also United States v.

United States v. Duff

605 F. Supp. 216 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 28, 1985

Carey v. Brown, 447 U.S. 455, 461-62 , 100 S.Ct. 2286, 2290-91 , 65 L.Ed.2d 263 (1980). See also Police Department of Chicago v. Mosley, 408 U.S. 92, 98-99, 101 , 92 S.Ct. 2286, 2291-92, 2293 , 33 L.Ed.2d 212 (1972). … International Society for Krishna Consciousness, Inc., 452 U.S. 640, 647-48 , 101 S.Ct. 2559, 2563-64 , 69 L.Ed.2d 298 (1981); Virginia Pharmacy Board v.

Murphy v. Internal Revenue Service

493 F.3d 170 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Aug 22, 2006

In 1999 the Department of Labor Administrative Review Board affirmed the ALJ’s findings and recommendations. See Leveille v. N.Y. Air Nat’l Guard, 1999 WL 966951, at *2-*4 (Oct. 25, 1999). … See Brown v.

Nuskey v. Hochberg

657 F. Supp. 2d 47 · District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 25, 2009

Jones-Brown. See Cones v. … See Timeliness Opinion at 3 (quoting Baldwin County Welcome Center v. Brown, 466 U.S. 147 , 148 n. 1, 104 S.Ct. 1723 , 80 L.Ed.2d 196 (1984) (per curiam) (citing Fed.R.Civ.P. 6(e)); Powell v.

Darden v. District of Columbia Department of Employment Services

911 A.2d 410 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Nov 22, 2006

The Board had authority to reverse the ALJ’s order only if it was unsupported by substantial evidence or was legally incorrect. See Gary v. … Frank v.

United States v. Jenkins

530 F. Supp. 8 · District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 12, 1981

In United States v. … In United States v.

Jones v. Pennsylvania Railroad

19 D.C. 178 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jun 15, 1890

Brown, 17 Wall., 445 . … Brown, 17 Wallace,. 445, appears to sanction this.

Havens v. Mabus

146 F. Supp. 3d 202 · District Court, District of Columbia · Nov 25, 2015

If so, the MEB refers the service member to an informal Physical Evaluation Board (“PEB”). Havens v. Mabus, 759 F.3d 91, 93 (D.C. Cir. 2014). … But the Board may rely on advisory opinions, like the ones provided by the CORB here, when making determinations. Roberts v. United States, 741 F.3d at 158–59, quoting Envtl. Def. Fund, Inc. v.

Gardner v. United States

898 A.2d 367 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · May 4, 2006

Over Gardner's objection, the trial court provided the jury with a transcript of Brown's in-court testimony and a copy of Brown’s pretrial statement, a document which had *372 been admitted into evidence during trial. … During Brown's testimony, counsel for Gardner had used the pretrial statement to impeach Brown; however, on redirect, the government used a different portion of the same statement to rehabilitate her.

Brhd Loco Eng Trainm v. STB

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jul 25, 2006

Hanson, General Counsel, Surface Transportation Board, and Craig M. Keats, Deputy General Counsel. Before: GINSBURG, Chief Judge, and BROWN and GRIFFITH, Circuit Judges. … Union-Illinois Legislative Bd. v. STB, 183 F.3d 606 (7th Cir. 1999); Bhd. of Locomotive Eng’rs v. STB, 101 F.3d 718, 726-28 (D.C.

Federal Trade Commission v. Staples, Inc.

190 F. Supp. 3d 100 · District Court, District of Columbia · May 10, 2016

F.T.C. v. Staples, Inc., 970 F.Supp. 1066, 1070 (D.D.C.1997) (citing 15 U.S.C. § 53 (b)); see also Brown Shoe v. … F.T.C. v. Arch Coal, Inc., 329 F.Supp.2d at 116 (quoting Brown Shoe at 322 n. 28, 82 S.Ct. 1502 ); see also United States v. General Dynamics, 415 U.S. 486, 498 , 94 S.Ct. 1186 , 39 L.Ed.2d 530 (1974).

Utility Workers Union of America, Local 246, Afl-Cio v. National Labor Relations Board, Southern California Edison Company, Intervenor

39 F.3d 1210 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Nov 18, 1994

See IRS v. … Workers v.

In Re Holdmann

834 A.2d 887 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Nov 6, 2003

The Board did not recommend that Holdmann be required to pay costs. Holdmann then excepted to the Board’s recommendation, and the case is now before us. II. … United States v. Olano, 507 U.S. 725, 732-37 , 113 S.Ct. 1770 , 123 L.Ed.2d 508 (1993); Baxter v. United States, 640 A.2d 714, 717 (D.C.1994). 4 .

Amobi v. District of Columbia Department of Corrections

262 F.R.D. 45 · District Court, District of Columbia · Dec 8, 2009

to Brown’s personal interests. … V.

Matter of Smith

403 A.2d 296 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jun 13, 1979

In Mendicino v. … Bouie v. City of Columbia, supra at 355, 84 S.Ct. 1697 .

Joseph Sheble, III v. Michael Huerta

755 F.3d 954 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 24, 2014

SHEBLE, III, PETITIONER v. MICHAEL P. … Sheble alleges that Brown’s fiancé had, at some point in the 2000s, told Sheble that he was running a “ticket mill” and that Brown later used the same phrase during Sheble’s SEED evaluation.