Case law

Z.A.

District Court, W.D. Washington · Feb 26, 2026

Congress established the TPS 9 program as part of the Immigration Act of 1990, Pub L. … It is likely 20 that Petitioner will qualify for the TPS program.

Haley v. Highland

142 Wash. 2d 135 · Washington Supreme Court · Nov 2, 2000

A slightly different regime is established for tort obligations. … The award of interest, which dates back to the time of the tortious activity of Highland, clearly indicates that no part of the $2,500 was intended to be an award of attorney fees.

Ago

Washington Attorney General Reports · Sep 26, 1996

As noted in our answer to Question 2, the Hanford roads do not meet the definition of "county road" set forth in RCW 46.04.150 , because they do not qualify as "public highways". … Although those roads may not be "county roads", the expenditure in question would still clearly be for "road purposes".

Junghee Kim Spicer v. Paul Patnode

443 P.3d 801 · Court of Appeals of Washington · Jun 25, 2019

Infliction of emotional distress by intentional behavior is by itself inadequate to establish this tort. … Patnode is clearly a bad neighbor, but he also is bad at being an outrageous one.

Meyer v. Bush

District Court, W.D. Washington · May 2, 2022

. # 3. 3 The Court must dismiss an IFP complaint if the action is frivolous or malicious, fails to 4 state a claim, or seeks relief from a defendant who is immune from such … And it is 17 his burden to establish loss of nationality.

Mutual of Enumclaw Insurance v. Dan Paulson Construction, Inc.

161 Wash. 2d 903 · Washington Supreme Court · Oct 11, 2007

“In order to establish bad faith, an insured is required to show the breach was unreasonable, frivolous, or unfounded.” … establishing which of the Martinellis’ claims were excluded from coverage under DPCI’s policy.

Reed v. City of Vancouver, Washington

District Court, W.D. Washington · Mar 8, 2021

Reed would have been 4 qualified for her role with reasonable accommodation and whether her accommodation was 5 reasonable. There is no question that the City knew Ms. … Therefore, a husband may not bring a 6 claim for loss of consortium if the injured wife’s employer is immune, for example by a statute 7 like the WIIA, which bars civil recovery for most injuries sustained in the course

Lutz v. Spokane Regional Health District

District Court, E.D. Washington · Apr 29, 2022

protection under this 14 agreement must be clearly so designated before or when the material is 15 disclosed or produced. 16 a. … This provision is not 14 intended to modify whatever procedure may be established in an e-discovery order 15 or agreement that provides for production without prior privilege review.

Cash v. Berryhill

356 F. Supp. 3d 1077 · District Court, W.D. Washington · Dec 19, 2018

Denise Sterchi, LICSW "Only physicians and certain other qualified specialists are considered '[a]cceptable medical sources.' " Ghanim v. … Breen's statements do not establish limitations on plaintiff's long-term or permanent abilities.

State v. McPhee

156 Wash. App. 44 · Court of Appeals of Washington · May 11, 2010

The jury could have reasonably inferred that McPhee knew the firearms were stolen when he possessed them on February 9. ¶40 The evidence clearly establishes the corpus delicti for the crime of possession of stolen firearms … It is long standing and well established that a property owner may testify as to the property’s market value without being qualified as an expert in this regard. State v. Hammond, 6 Wn.

State v. McFarland

Washington Supreme Court · Aug 3, 2017

I cannot come up with any legitimate reason to hold that the circumstances of this case qualify for such special treatment. … The record in Mulholland thus clearly showed that the trial court had an erroneous view of the law. Cf McGill, 112 Wn.

Eugster v. City of Spokane

39 P.3d 380 · Court of Appeals of Washington · Feb 5, 2002

Thus, a consensus on a position to be voted on at a later council meeting would qualify as a collective position and a "final action." Id. at 330-31, 979 P.2d 429 . … Eugster may be viewed as having fostered OPMA principles through his actions, but this conclusion must be established after fact-finding. If Mr.

State v. Dolan

17 Wash. 499 · Washington Supreme Court · Sep 7, 1897

Both these elements were alleged as facts in the information, and it was therefore incumbent upon the state to establish them as facts by competent evidence. … "We do not, of course, desire to be understood as holding, or even intimating, that voluntary intoxication is an excuse for crime actually committed, for such is clearly not the law.

State v. Rupe

101 Wash. 2d 664 · Washington Supreme Court · Jun 7, 1984

Was defendant denied due process by the procedure of death qualifying the jury? Defendant's challenges to his death sentence include: 11. … The above language clearly restricts the admissibility of evidence relating to constitutionally protected behavior.

Fabian-Miller v. Department of Social & Health Services

157 Wash. App. 179 · Court of Appeals of Washington · Aug 2, 2010

The fact it does not identify every situation not qualifying as foster care cannot reasonably be interpreted to expand the compact. ¶25 Under article V, the sending state retains jurisdiction over the child as if “the child … In any event, regulation 3 cannot control because it impermissibly expands the scope of the ICPC beyond that established in article III.

Eugster v. City of Spokane

110 Wash. App. 212 · Court of Appeals of Washington · Feb 5, 2002

Thus, a consensus on a position to be voted on at a later council meeting would qualify as a collective position and a “final action.” Id. at 330-31 . … Eugster may be viewed as having fostered OPMA principles through his actions, but this conclusion must be established after fact finding. If Mr.

Satcher v. Stanislaus

District Court, W.D. Washington · Feb 24, 2020

Stanislaus clearly does not want to appear 19 before the Court to represent her own interest. … Nothing establishes that Stanislaus was not properly joined and 10 served at the time Defendant filed its notice of removal.

Martini v. Boeing Co.

88 Wash. App. 442 · Court of Appeals of Washington · Oct 13, 1997

Clearly, this is not a promotion or demotion case. Martini sought a move to another job to address his disability concerns. Moreover, Boeing does not argue that Martini failed to mitigate his damages. … Conn. 1988) (evidence of discriminatory acts before statute of limitations not admissible because they did not establish a continuous practice or policy of discrimination, and because such evidence would likely confuse the

Salom v. Nationstar Mortgage LLC

District Court, W.D. Washington · Nov 25, 2024

If only a portion or portions of the material on a page qualifies for protection, 20 || the producing party also must clearly identify the protected portion(s) (e.g., by making appropriate 21 || markings in the margins … This provision is not intended to 14 || modify whatever procedure may be established in an e-discovery order or agreement that provides 15 || for production without prior privilege review.

Love XOX v. Gomez

District Court, W.D. Washington · Jan 24, 2025

12 complaint, or any portion of the complaint, if the complaint: (1) is frivolous, malicious, or fails to 13 state a claim upon which relief may be granted; or (2) seeks monetary relief from a defendant 14 who is immune … In doing so, Plaintiff 9 must clearly and directly state the factual basis of her claims against specific Defendants, and she 10 should only include Defendants for whom she can establish personal participation beyond