Case law

State of Maine v. Dobbins

Superior Court of Maine · May 24, 2017

State v. Higgins, 2002 ME 77; citing Illinois v. Gates, 562 US 213. … Red brown staining was found in the interior of the pickup.

Elston v. Elston & Co.

131 Me. 149 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Apr 13, 1932

Brown and Herbert I. … Halstead v. Grinna, 152 U. S., 412 .

State v. Gleason

404 A.2d 573 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 31, 1979

Cole Realty, Inc., Me., 325 A.2d 19, 21 (1974); State v. Brown, 75 Me. 456 (1883). This juvenile cautiously appealed at the time the order was originally entered as well as following the adjudication and disposition. … See King Resources Co. v. Environmental Improvement Com’n., Me., 270 A.2d 863, 870 (1970); East Meadow Community Concerts Ass’n. v. Board of Education, 18 N.Y.2d 129 , 272 N.Y.S.2d 341, 344 , 219 N.E.2d 172, 174 (1966).

Lentz v. Maine State Bd.of Licensure in Med.

Superior Court of Maine · Feb 6, 2004

Centamore v. Dep’t of Human Services, 664 A.2d 369, 370 (Me. 1995). … Seider v. Board of Exam’r of Psychologists, 2000 ME 206 79, 762 A.2d 551, 555 (Me. 2000) (citing CWCO, Inc. v. Superintendent of Ins., 1997 ME 226, ]6, 703 A.2d 1258, 1261 (Me. 1997)).

Lane Constr. Corp. v. Town of Washington

Superior Court of Maine · Mar 31, 2005

The court is not permitted to “make findings independent of those explicitly or implicitly found by the board or [to] substitute its judgment for that of the board.” Perrin v. … See Stewart v. Town of Sedgwick, 2000 ME 157, { 4, 757 A.2d 773, 775. If, however, the board acted only in an appellate capacity, the court reviews directly the decision of the planning board, not the board of appeals.

Smith v. Poor

22 F. Cas. 627 · District Court, D. Maine · Apr 15, 1858

Smith v. Hurd, 12 Metc. [Mass.] 371; Smith v. Poor, 40 Me. *629 415 . … French v. Fuller, 23 Pick. 108 .

Inhabitants of Palmyra v. Inhabitants of Prospect

30 Me. 211 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 1, 1849

The answer, signed by one of the overseers of Prospect, purporting to be by order of the board, acknowledged the receipt of the notice “ touching the Curtis family,” and states, that on inquiry made, although Curtis had frequently … Hanover v. Turner, 14 Mass. 227 ; R. S. chap. 32, sect. 50. The answer denies the settlement of James Curtis in Prospect, and its liability for supplies furnished for him.

Porter v. Porter

138 Me. 1 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · May 19, 1941

Thus we find Scott quoting from Curtiss v. … Moulton, 84 Me., 545 at 551, 24 A., 1004 ; Mann v. Mann, 122 Me., 468, 120 A., 541 . In Richardson v.

Zegel v. State of Maine, Bd. Of Soc. Work Licensure

Superior Court of Maine · Apr 30, 2003

Gashgai v. Board of Registration in Medicine, 390 A.2d 1080 (Me. 1978). … See Frye v. Inhabitants of the Town of Cumberland, 464 A.2d 195, 199 (Me. 1983).

Norton v. Benjamin

220 A.2d 248 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jun 1, 1966

In the leading case of Killian v. … We note in passing that the release in the instant case contains the equivalent phrase “all * * * causes of action.” *253 A like result was reached by a single judge in Brown v.

Margani v. Sanders

453 A.2d 501 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Dec 8, 1982

See, e.g., Rodgers v. Commonwealth Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 40 Pa.Cmwlth. 552 , 397 A.2d 1286, 1287 (1979). Domicile has two components: residence and the intent to remain. … Inhabitants of Exeter v.

Petrin v. Town of Scarborough

Superior Court of Maine · Feb 18, 2015

The court must affirm the decision of the [Board] unless that decision was unlawful, arbitrary, capricious, or unreasonable." Driscoll v. Gheewalla, 441 A.2d 1025, 1026 (Me. 1982). … Moser v.

Iozapavichus v. Fournier

308 A.2d 573 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 31, 1973

Ramon paid a modest amount for board and lodging but in all respects regarded himself and was treated by the Sot-mans as a member of, the “family.” … Wing, Adm’x. *576 v. Rogers (1953) 149 Me, 340, 107 A.2d 708 ; Swan v. Swan (1958) 154 Me. 276 , 147 A.2d 140 .

Maine Farmers Exch., Inc. v. Farm Credit of Maine, A.C.A.

Superior Court of Maine · Jan 5, 2001

In Massey-Ferguson Credit Corp. v. Brown, Massey-Ferguson was found liable to account debtor because it participated in the sale in question. If it had not, it would not be liable for debtors failure to perform. … Massey-Ferguson Credit Corp. v. Brown, 567 P.2d 440, 443 (MT 1977). 9 significant number of the orders which MFX eventually placed with NEI. Here, all of NEI’s accounts receivable had been assigned to Farm Credit.

Portland Terminal Co. v. City of Portland

129 Me. 264 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Aug 22, 1930

Bath v. Whitmore, 79 Me., 182. … Co. v.

Greenlaw v. Town of Cumberland

Superior Court of Maine · Mar 4, 2009

York v. … Keating v. Zoning Board of Appeals of Saco, 325 A.2d 52L 524 (Me. 1974).

Laurie Allen v. Mark Rae

2019 ME 53 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Apr 11, 2019

See Patane v. … Smith v.

Rousselle v. Town Council of the Town of S. Berwick

Superior Court of Maine · Sep 29, 2006

See Wells v. Portland Yacht Club, 2001 ME 20, ¶4, 771 A.2d 371, 373. A municipal officer may appeal a board's decision if "aggrieved by [the] decision." Crosby v. … Board members for their votes . . . are not findings." Carroll v. Town of Rockport, 2003 ME 135, q[31,837 A.2d 148,157.

Whitley v. Bd. of Trustees, Maine Pub. Employees Retirement Sys.

Superior Court of Maine · Jul 24, 2009

Centamore v. Dep't of Human Servs., 664 A.2d 369, 370 (Me. 1995). … The burden of proof rests with the party seeking to overturn the agency's decision, and that party must prove that no competent evidence supports the Board's decision. Bischoff v.

State v. President of the Waldo Bank

20 Me. 470 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 15, 1841

Foster & al. v. Essex Bank, 16 Mass. R. 245 . … The following cases, Percy v. Wilson, 7 Mass. R. 393 ; Brown v. Penobscot Bank, 8 Mass. R. 445 ; Patterson & al. v. Buckminister & al. Trustee, 14 Mass.