Case law

Williams v. United States

927 A.2d 1064 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jun 21, 2007

Lucas v. United States, 476 A.2d 1140, 1142 (D.C.1984) (citing United States v. Workcuff, 137 U.S.App. D.C. 263, 264-65, 422 F.2d 700, 701-02 (1970)) (footnote omitted). … Lucas, 476 A.2d at 1142 ; see also McCoy v.

Rodgers v. Perez

139 F. Supp. 3d 67 · District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 29, 2015

or “the Board”). 5 U.S.C. §§ 7512, 7701. … Brown v. Marsh, 777 F.2d 8, 14 (D.C. Cir. 1985) (internal citations omitted). Further, a plaintiff may be “excused from exhaustion when there are equitable reasons for doing so.” Broom v. Caldera, 129 F.

United Scenic Artists, Local 829, Brotherhood of Painters and Allied Trades, Afl-Cio v. National Labor Relations Board

655 F.2d 1267 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · May 26, 1981

Were this merely a question of credibility, we would agree that it is properly left to the ALJ and the Board. Amalgamated Clothing Workers v. … This record is therefore inadequate to support an unstated assumption drawn by the Board that the Union had knowledge of TTI’s complete control over the disputed work. NLRB v.

Independent Petrochemical Corp. v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.

672 F. Supp. 1 · District Court, District of Columbia · Aug 8, 1986

Corp. v. Liberty Mut. Ins. Co., 748 F.2d 760, 765-66 (2d Cir.1984); see also Abex Corp. v. Maryland Cas. … Browne (District Manager of IPC in St.

Retail Clerks International Association Local No. 455, Afl-Cio v. National Labor Relations Board, Retail Clerks Union, Local No. 560 Retail Clerks International Association, Afl-Cio v. National Labor Relations Board

510 F.2d 802 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Feb 4, 1975

P 10,632 RETAIL CLERKS INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION LOCAL NO. 455, AFL-CIO, Petitioner, v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Respondent. … While the Board may defer to arbitration on the issue of accretion to an existing unit, both the Board and the courts have required that any award be consistent with Board bargaining unit policy. See Boire v.

United States v. Perry Lynch

499 F.2d 1011 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · May 7, 1974

Because United States v. … Indeed, in Barker v.

Havens v. Mabus

146 F. Supp. 3d 202 · District Court, District of Columbia · Nov 25, 2015

If so, the MEB refers the service member to an informal Physical Evaluation Board (“PEB”). Havens v. Mabus, 759 F.3d 91, 93 (D.C. Cir. 2014). … But the Board may rely on advisory opinions, like the ones provided by the CORB here, when making determinations. Roberts v. United States, 741 F.3d at 158–59, quoting Envtl. Def. Fund, Inc. v.

Void v. Smoot

218 F. Supp. 3d 101 · District Court, District of Columbia · Oct 31, 2016

See id., Ex. 1 (DC Board of Parole Guideline Prehearing Assessment dated December 6, 2011) at 1. … Browning v. Clinton, 292 F.3d 235, 242 (D.C. Cir. 2002).

Committee of Neighbors Directly Impacted by LAMB Application v. DC Board of Zoning Adjustment and LAMB Public Charter School

District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Oct 31, 2019

Alana V. Rusin, with whom Cary R. … Homes, Inc. v.

Miller v. D.C. OEA

District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Sep 10, 2020

On June 6, 2017, the OEA Board affirmed. Ms. Miller petitioned the Superior Court for review of the OEA Board’s decision. On October 30, 2018, the Superior Court affirmed. Ms. … See Valdes v. D.C.

Marc Feldman v. William C. Gardner Edward J. Hickey, Jr. v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals

661 F.2d 1295 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Sep 28, 1981

Although this doctrine originated much earlier, 68 its principal exposition came in Parker v. Brown, 69 decided in 1943. … These cases thus differ from Brown v.

Sitcov v. District of Columbia Bar

885 A.2d 289 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Oct 20, 2005

Davis v. … Huffstetler, 433 So.2d 964, 965 (Fla.1983); Brown v. Oregon State Bar, 293 Or. 446 , 648 P.2d 1289, 1293 (1982); Pennsylvania Pub. Util. Comm’n Bar Ass’n v.

Kelley v. Morris

400 A.2d 1045 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Apr 9, 1979

Nor can the suit survive as one against the Board itself since the statutes creating the Board of Education did not make it a suable entity. See Roberson v. … District of Columbia Board of Higher Education, D.C.App., 359 A.2d 28 , 31 n.4 (1976); Miller v.

In Re Goldsborough

654 A.2d 1285 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Feb 23, 1995

See, e.g., Fehlhaber v. … See, e.g., United States v.

American Federation of Labor and Congress of Industrial Organizations v. NLRB

57 F.4th 1023 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jan 17, 2023

unfair labor practices,” AFL v. … James V. Hurson Assocs., Inc. v. Glickman, 229 F.3d 277, 282 (D.C. Cir. 2000).

United States v. Emor

850 F. Supp. 2d 176 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 23, 2012

United States v. Browne, 505 F.3d at 1281; see United States v. McGinty, 610 F.3d at 1248 (“‘Payment of restitution in no way alters the status of the property as ill-gotten gains. … V.

United States v. Duff

605 F. Supp. 216 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 28, 1985

Carey v. Brown, 447 U.S. 455, 461-62 , 100 S.Ct. 2286, 2290-91 , 65 L.Ed.2d 263 (1980). See also Police Department of Chicago v. Mosley, 408 U.S. 92, 98-99, 101 , 92 S.Ct. 2286, 2291-92, 2293 , 33 L.Ed.2d 212 (1972). … International Society for Krishna Consciousness, Inc., 452 U.S. 640, 647-48 , 101 S.Ct. 2559, 2563-64 , 69 L.Ed.2d 298 (1981); Virginia Pharmacy Board v.

Matter of Burka

423 A.2d 181 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Oct 21, 1980

[Mathews v. Eldridge, 424 U.S. 319, 335 , 96 S.Ct. 893, 903 , 47 L.Ed.2d 18 (1976).] … Kelly, 397 U.S. 254 , 90 S.Ct. 1011 , 25 L.Ed.2d 287 (1970) (prohibiting termination of welfare benefits before an adversary hearing); Sniadach v.

District of Columbia v. Tarlosky

675 A.2d 77 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · May 9, 1996

He concluded: The House and Senate Committee Reports provide no hint that the “scheduled rate of compensation” phrase was meant to be limiting or that the equalization provision should in some way not cover across the board … See, e.g., United States v. Brown, 422 A.2d 1281, 1284 (D.C.1980).

United States v. Perkins, Derrin A.

138 F.3d 421 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Mar 20, 1998

In addition, Sparrow's proffer asserted that Hartwell had signed his recantation "under duress" from appellant Board. … v.