Case law

Workman v. United Methodist Committee on Relief of the General Board of Global Ministries of the United Methodist Church

320 F.3d 259 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Feb 25, 2003

See, e.g., Potts v. … In Doe v.

Chung v. District of Columbia Department of Consumer & Regulatory Affairs

751 A.2d 989 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · May 25, 2000

See District of Columbia Preservation League v. District of Columbia Dep’t of Consumer & Regulatory Affairs, 711 A.2d 1273, 1275 (D.C.1998); Reneau v. District of Columbia, 676 A.2d 913, 917 (D.C.1996). … See Kingsley v.

Shelton v. United States

983 A.2d 979 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Nov 19, 2009

Brown, supra, 554 A.2d at 1160 (citing Alston v. … Watkins v. United States, 846 A.2d 293, 301 (D.C.2004); Brown, supra, 554 A.2d at 1162 .

Local 666, International Alliance of Theatrical Stage Employees & Moving Pictures Machine Operators v. National Labor Relations Board

904 F.2d 47 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · May 29, 1990

Thus, the Board's unit finding does not per se preclude the employer from adding to, or subtracting from, the employees’ work assignments.’ ” 692 F.2d at 623 (quoting Carey v. Westinghouse Elec. … As Justice Stewart presciently observed in Fibreboard Corp. v.

United States v. Eddie Brown

948 F.2d 782 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Feb 7, 1992

UNITED STATES of America v. Eddie BROWN, Appellant. No. 90-3234. United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit. Nov. 27, 1991. Rehearing and Rehearing En Banc Denied Feb. 7, 1992. Before HARRY T. … As this Court explained in United States v.

Capitol Hill Hospital v. District of Columbia State Health Planning & Development Agency

600 A.2d 793 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Nov 20, 1991

Co. v. District of Columbia Contract Appeals Bd., 549 A.2d 315, 318 (D.C.1988) (Superior Court jurisdiction for “protest” rather than “appeal” of Board’s decision); Capitol Hill Restoration Soc’y, Inc. v. … (quoting Brown v. Duchesne, 60 U.S. (19 How.) 183, 194 , 15 L.Ed. 595 (1857)); District of Columbia v.

Rd. Sprinkler Fitters Local Union No. 669 v. Nat'l Labor Relations Bd.

324 F. Supp. 3d 85 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Aug 24, 2018

v. … And "[i]t is well-established that 'the Board need only select an appropriate unit, not the most appropriate unit.' " Rhino Nw., LLC v. NLRB , 867 F.3d 95 , 99 (D.C. Cir. 2017) (quoting Dodge of Naperville, Inc. v.

Murphy v. Internal Revenue Service

493 F.3d 170 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Aug 22, 2006

In 1999 the Department of Labor Administrative Review Board affirmed the ALJ’s findings and recommendations. See Leveille v. N.Y. Air Nat’l Guard, 1999 WL 966951, at *2-*4 (Oct. 25, 1999). … See Brown v.

Coleman v. Godsey

249 F.2d 522 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Oct 31, 1957

COLEMAN, Appellant, v. Wiley W. GODSEY, Acting Chairman, Board of Revocation and Review of Hackers' Identification Licenses, and Robert E. McLaughlin, et al., Board of District of Columbia Commissioners, Appellees. … We think it follows that the Board's action in revoking appellant's license is not supported by substantial evidence on the record as a whole.

McCrea v. District of Columbia

District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 31, 2021

See Browning v. Clinton, 292 F.3d 235, 242 (D.C. Cir. 2002). … See Browning v. Clinton, 292 F.3d 235, 244 (D.C.

National Black United Fund, Inc. v. Campbell

494 F. Supp. 748 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 1, 1980

See also Carey v. Brown,__U.S. at___, 100 S.Ct. at 2289. The- regulation must ensure that individuals are not empowered with determining the “worthiness” of a particular cause. Cantwell v. … See Goldberg v. Kelly, 397 U.S. 254 , 90 S.Ct. 1011 , 25 L.Ed.2d 287 (1970); see also Board of Regents v. Roth, 408 U.S. 564, 577 , 92 S.Ct. 2701, 2709 , 33 L.Ed.2d 548 (1972).

Augburn v. United States

514 A.2d 452 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Sep 2, 1986

In Frazier v. … In Toliver v.

In Re Cleaver-Bascombe

986 A.2d 1191 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jan 14, 2010

Mgmt. v. District of Columbia Rental Hous. Comm’n, 677 A.2d 46, 48 (D.C.1996) (citing Kritsidi- *1196 mas v. Sheskin, 411 A.2d 370, 371 (D.C.1980)); see also M.A.P. v. … Id..; Hsu v. United States, 392 A.2d 972, 980-81 (D.C.1978) (stating the rule that "one witness plus independent corroborative evidence will also suffice” for proof of perjury). .

Association of Flight Attendants-CWA v. United States Department of Transportation

564 F.3d 462 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · May 1, 2009

Cir. 2005) (quoting United Food & Commercial Workers Union Local 751 v. Brown Group, Inc., 517 U.S. 544, 553 (1996)) (internal quotation omitted). … Allen v.

Kinard v. United States

288 A.2d 233 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Mar 6, 1972

Lee, D.C.App., 271 A.2d 566 (1970) and Dickerson v. United States, D.C.Mun.App., 120 A.2d 588 (1956). … Rouse v. United States, 123 U.S.App. D.C. 348, 350, 359 F.2d 1014, 1016 (1966). [Footnote omitted.] . Id. Cf. Jackson v. United States, 122 U.S.App.D.C. 324 , 353 F.2d 862 (1965).

Green v. Connally

330 F. Supp. 1150 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 30, 1971

The policy against racial segregation in education was broadly proclaimed as to public education by the states in the historic decision in Brown v. Board of Education, 347 U.S. 483 , 74 U.S. 686 , 98 L.Ed. 873 (1954). … Compare Everson v. Board of Education, 330 U.S. 1 , 67 S.Ct. 504 , 91 L.Ed. 711 (1947) with Griffin v. County School Board, 377 U.S. 218 , 84 S.Ct. 1226 , 12 L.Ed.2d 236 (1964).

In Re Brown

320 A.2d 92 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · May 20, 1974

See, in this connection, United States v. Marshall, 451 F.2d 372 (9th Cir. 1971). … As the court said in Sykes v.

McKinley v. Federal Deposit Insurance

744 F. Supp. 2d 128 · District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 29, 2010

In support of its argument, the Board cites two cases: Quarles v. Dep’t of the Navy, 893 F.2d 390 (D.C.Cir.1990), and Montrose Chemical Corp. v. Train, 491 F.2d 63 (D.C.Cir.1974.) … On January 28, 2010, after initially withholding it, the Board produced Item # 23 (Bates # 0046). (Thro Decl. V 11.) 6 .

Building and Construction Trades Department, Afl-Cio v. United States Department of Labor Wage Appeals Board, Midway Excavators, Inc.

932 F.2d 985 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jul 18, 1991

Zachry Co. v. United States, 170 Ct.Cl. 115 , 344 F.2d 352 (1965). … See Petition for Review by the Wage Appeals Board at 6 (Nov. 20, 1981).

Jung v. Association of American Medical Colleges

300 F. Supp. 2d 119 · District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 11, 2004

See Summit Health, Ltd. v. Pinhas, 500 U.S. at 325, 111 S.Ct. 1842 ; Browning v. Clinton, 292 F.3d at 242 . … United States v. Brown University, 5 F.3d at 666 (quoting Goldfarb v. Virginia State Bar, 421 U.S. at 787-88 , 95 S.Ct. 2004 ). See also Association for Intercollegiate Athletics for Women v.