Case law

Harrison v. United States

407 A.2d 683 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Oct 26, 1979

She also testified that on that same day, appellant’s brown jacket was at the cleaners. I. … See Angarano v. United States, D.C.App., 312 A.2d 295 (1973); Bruce v. United States, 126 U.S.App.D.C. 336 , 379 F.2d 113 (1967). Also see Woody v.

International Union of Electrical, Radio and MacHine Workers, Afl-Cio, Local 806 v. National Labor Relations Board, Snc Manufacturing Co., Inc., Intervenor. National Labor Relations Board v. Snc Manufacturing Co., Inc.

434 F.2d 473 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Mar 20, 1970

National Labor Relations Board, supra; N.L.R.B. v. … Daniel Construction Co. v. N.L.R.B., 341 F.2d 805 , 809-810 (4th Cir. 1965); Boire v. Greyhound Corp., 376 U.S. 473 , 84 S.Ct. 894 , 11 L.Ed.2d 849 (1964); National Labor Relations Board v.

Fur Workers Union, Local No. 72 v. Fur Workers Union, No. 21238

105 F.2d 1 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Mar 27, 1939

Hamilton-Brown Shoe Co. v. Wolf Brothers, 1916, 240 U.S. 251, 258 , 36 S.Ct. 269 , 60 L.Ed. 629 . Atlantic Coast Line R. Co. v. Powe, 1931, 283 U.S. 401, 403 , 51 S.Ct. 498 , 75 L.Ed. 1142 . … Co. v. Ry. Clerks, 1930, 281 U.S. 548 , 50 S.Ct. 427 , 74 L.Ed. 1034 ; Virginian Ry. v. Federation, 1937, 300 U. S. 515 , 57 S.Ct. 592 , 81 L.Ed. 789 ; National Labor Board v.

American Federation of Labor and Congress of Industrial Organizations v. NLRB

57 F.4th 1023 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jan 17, 2023

unfair labor practices,” AFL v. … James V. Hurson Assocs., Inc. v. Glickman, 229 F.3d 277, 282 (D.C. Cir. 2000).

Howmet Corp. v. Environmental Protection Agency

614 F.3d 544 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Aug 6, 2010

Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge BROWN. … Co. v. EPA, 53 F.3d 1324, 1327 (D.C.Cir.1995); see also Exportal Ltda. v.

Local 666, International Alliance of Theatrical Stage Employees & Moving Pictures Machine Operators v. National Labor Relations Board

904 F.2d 47 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · May 29, 1990

Thus, the Board's unit finding does not per se preclude the employer from adding to, or subtracting from, the employees’ work assignments.’ ” 692 F.2d at 623 (quoting Carey v. Westinghouse Elec. … As Justice Stewart presciently observed in Fibreboard Corp. v.

Grain Elevator, Flour and Feed Mill Workers, International Longshoremen Association, Local 418, Afl-Cio v. National Labor Relations Board

376 F.2d 774 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Mar 31, 1967

Madden v. Grain Elevator, etc., Local 418, supra note 2 at 1019. That opinion sufficiently demonstrates the inapplicability to the controversy before the Board of the Supreme Court’s decision in Incres S.S. Co. v. … Madden v. Grain Elevator, etc., Local 418, supra note 2, 334 F.2d at 1020 . This was not the basis of the Board’s decision, and hence is not before us. 8 .

Shelton v. United States

983 A.2d 979 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Nov 19, 2009

Brown, supra, 554 A.2d at 1160 (citing Alston v. … Watkins v. United States, 846 A.2d 293, 301 (D.C.2004); Brown, supra, 554 A.2d at 1162 .

McCrea v. District of Columbia

District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 31, 2021

See Browning v. Clinton, 292 F.3d 235, 242 (D.C. Cir. 2002). … See Browning v. Clinton, 292 F.3d 235, 244 (D.C.

Broom v. Caldera

129 F. Supp. 2d 25 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jan 19, 2001

See Ososky v. Wick, 704 F.2d 1264, 1265 (D.C.Cir.1983)(citing Brown v. GSA, 425 U.S. 820, 832 , 96 S.Ct. 1961 , 48 L.Ed.2d 402 (1976)). … Brown v. Marsh, 777 F.2d 8, 14 (D.C.Cir.1985).

Massachusetts School of Law at Andover, Inc., Proposed Intervenor v. United States of America, American Bar Association

118 F.3d 776 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jul 15, 1997

See United States v. Alex. Brown & Sons, 169 F.R.D. 532, 539-40 (S.D.N.Y.1996) (granting intervention of right in Tunney Act proceeding to move to compel disclosure of settlement documents). … United States v. Alex. Brown & Sons, Inc., 169 F.R.D. 532, 541 (S.D.N.Y.1996).

United States v. Savoy

883 F. Supp. 2d 101 · District Court, District of Columbia · Aug 3, 2012

Savoy and Brown rely on U.S. Telecom Ass’n v. … Telecom Ass’n v. F.C.C., 227 F.3d 450, 464 (D.C.Cir.2000). Initially, the Court notes that Savoy and Brown’s reliance on U.S. Telecom is misguided. In U.S.

Ascom Hasler Mailing Systems, Inc. v. United States Postal Service

815 F. Supp. 2d 148 · District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 30, 2011

Relying on Brown v. … Brown v. Legal Found. of Wash., 538 U.S. at 235.

United States v. Eddie Brown

948 F.2d 782 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Feb 7, 1992

UNITED STATES of America v. Eddie BROWN, Appellant. No. 90-3234. United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit. Nov. 27, 1991. Rehearing and Rehearing En Banc Denied Feb. 7, 1992. Before HARRY T. … As this Court explained in United States v.

Saunders v. Davis

District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 15, 2016

Brown v. Whole Foods Mkt. Grp., Inc., 789 F.3d 146, 151 (D.C. … See Brown v. Whole Foods Mkt. Grp., Inc., 789 F.3d 146, 151 (D.C. Cir. 2015). In Confederate Mem’l Ass’n, the D.C.

Quigley v. Giblin

569 F.3d 449 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 23, 2009

Before: HENDERSON, BROWN and KAVANAUGH, Circuit Judges. Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge HENDERSON. … Hill v.

Dave v. Lanier

681 F. Supp. 2d 68 · District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 3, 2010

Macharia v. United States, 334 F.3d 61, 64, 67 (D.C.Cir.2003); Holy Land Found. for Relief & Dev. v. Ashcroft, 333 F.3d 156, 165 (D.C.Cir.2003); Browning, 292 F.3d at 242 . … Warren v. District of Columbia, 353 F.3d 36, 40 (D.C.Cir.2004); Browning, 292 F.3d at 242 . “Threadbare recitals of the elements of a cause of action, supported by mere conclusory statements, do not suffice.”

Kinard v. United States

288 A.2d 233 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Mar 6, 1972

Lee, D.C.App., 271 A.2d 566 (1970) and Dickerson v. United States, D.C.Mun.App., 120 A.2d 588 (1956). … Rouse v. United States, 123 U.S.App. D.C. 348, 350, 359 F.2d 1014, 1016 (1966). [Footnote omitted.] . Id. Cf. Jackson v. United States, 122 U.S.App.D.C. 324 , 353 F.2d 862 (1965).

Workman v. United Methodist Committee on Relief of the General Board of Global Ministries of the United Methodist Church

320 F.3d 259 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Feb 25, 2003

See, e.g., Potts v. … In Doe v.

Chung v. District of Columbia Department of Consumer & Regulatory Affairs

751 A.2d 989 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · May 25, 2000

See District of Columbia Preservation League v. District of Columbia Dep’t of Consumer & Regulatory Affairs, 711 A.2d 1273, 1275 (D.C.1998); Reneau v. District of Columbia, 676 A.2d 913, 917 (D.C.1996). … See Kingsley v.