Case law

Compensation of Million v. State Accident Insurance Fund

45 Or. App. 1097 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Apr 28, 1980

The denial was further affirmed by both the Workers’ Compensation Board and this Court. Million v. SAIF, 35 Or App 269 , 581 P2d 136 (1978). … Taylor v. Baker, 279 Or 139, 144 , 566 P2d 884 (1977); Dean v. Exotic Veneers Inc., 271 Or 188, 194 , 531 P2d 266 (1975).

Stacy v. Employment Dept.

240 Or. App. 183 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Dec 29, 2010

Stevenson v. Morgan, 17 Or.App. 428, 433 , 522 P.2d 1204 (1974). The board's order denying unemployment benefits to claimant is based on alternative reasons and conclusions. … See Pinto v.

State v. Ogle

291 Or. 364 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jul 8, 1981

Brown, 262 Or 442 , 497 P2d 1191 (1972). … Under Brown v.

Legacy Health Systems & Legacy Health System v. Noble

232 Or. App. 93 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Nov 18, 2009

Krushwitz v. McDonald’s Restaurants, 323 Or 520, 531 , 919 P2d 465 (1996) (citing Phil A. Livesley Co. v. Russ, 296 Or 25, 28 , 672 P2d 337 (1983)). … Further, we held in Hearthstone Manor v.

State ex rel. Multnomah County Education Service District v. Dooley

295 Or. 138 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jun 7, 1983

In the meantime, beginning on February 22, 1983, the case of School District No. 1 et al v. Multnomah County Education District, et al, was tried. Neither side called any of the ESD board members as witnesses. … Dept. v. Holland, 290 Or 765, 767 , 625 P2d 1318 (1981); Coin Millwork v. Lbr. & Sawmill Union, 248 Or 617, 620 , 435 P2d 1015 (1968). Cf. Callbeck et al v.

Westmoreland v. Iowa Beef Processors

70 Or. App. 642 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Nov 7, 1984

We reverse the Board and reinstate the referee’s order. … We find that claimant has sufficiently shown a connection between his work and the injury. 1 See also Garbutt v.

Hoffman v. Bumble Bee Seafoods (No. 29147)

15 Or. App. 253 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Nov 5, 1973

The hearing officer had denied the claim and .the Workmen’s Compensation Board had reversed, al-Jowing it. … This language was repeated by the circuit judge in his letter opinion which upheld the board. The '"hearing officer and ■ the* board wrote extensive .opinions, explaining their conclusions.

In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of Jordan

295 Or. 142 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jun 7, 1983

State Farm v. Century Home, supra, 275 Or at 105 . … As we stated in Bahler v.

Turner v. Thompson

157 Or. App. 182 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Nov 4, 1998

On appeal, plaintiff argues that the Board’s initial deferral was impermissible under our decision in Meadows v. … Jones v. Thompson, 156 Or App 226 , 968 P2d 380 (1998). Regarding his argument that the Board lacked authority to require him to undergo a psychological evaluation, we disagree.

Van Der Vaarte v. SAIF Corp.

228 Or. App. 337 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · May 13, 2009

We state the material facts consistently with the board’s findings. Sisco v. Quicker Recovery, 218 Or App 376, 378 , 180 P3d 46 (2008). When he was injured, claimant worked in employer’s warehouse. … Fred Meyer, Inc. v. Hayes, 325 Or 592, 597-98 , 943 P2d 197 (1997).

Burt v. Blumenauer

299 Or. 55 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 23, 1985

Board of Education, supra, and Stanson v. Mott, supra, or for “drowning out” the free speech of opposing voices, a problem acknowledged in Miller v. California Com’n on Status of Women, supra. … In Gosso v.

Skochenko v. Weyerhaeuser Co.

118 Or. App. 241 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Feb 17, 1993

Claimant argues that the Board misread their medical opinions. He contends, relying on Asten-Hill Co. v. … See Asten-Hill Co. v. Armstrong, supra. Reversed and remanded for reconsideration of compensability of herniated disc.

Ginter v. Woodburn United Methodist Church

62 Or. App. 118 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Mar 2, 1983

The Board concluded that the expert evidence preponderated against a finding of medical causation. The Board did not reach the issue of penalties and attorney fees. … Frasure v. Agripac, 290 Or 99 , 619 P2d 274 (1980); Saxton v. Lamb-Weston, 49 Or App 887 , 621 P2d 619 (1980), rev den 290 Or 727 (1981).

Buckner v. Kennedy's Riding Academy

18 Or. App. 516 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Sep 9, 1974

Cf., City of *520 Idanha v. Consumers Power, 13 Or App 431, 434 , 509 P2d 1226 , Sup Ct review denied (1973); Holmes v. Morgan, 10 Or App 242, 248 , 498 P2d 830 , Sup Ct review denied (1972). … ORS 656.002 (14) and (22); Bauer v. Richardson, supra; see, Oremus v. Ore. Pub. Co./Leibrand, 11 Or App 444 , 503 P2d 722 (1972), Sup Ct review denied (1973).

Wilke v. State Accident Insurance Fund

49 Or. App. 427 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Nov 24, 1980

The referee and the Workers’ Compensation Board (Board) found that the benefits should commence on the date of the referee’s order. … See also Silsby v. SAIF, 39 Or App 555 , 592 P2d 1074 (1979).

Clark v. Linn

98 Or. App. 393 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Sep 13, 1989

In reaching its result, the Board relied on our opinion in Derryberry v. Dokey, 91 Or App 533 , 756 P2d 1255 , rev den *396 306 Or 661 (1988). There, the claimant contended that Bauman v. … To the extent that Derryberry v. Dokey, supra, suggests a contrary result, it is disapproved. 2 We conclude, therefore, that the Board erred in failing to address the question of compensability.

Publishers Paper Co. v. Morgan

10 Or. App. 94 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jun 23, 1972

The majority view is well expressed in Campbell Soup Co. v. Div. of Employment Security, 13 NJ 431, 100 A2d 287 (1953), where the court, speaking through Justice William B. … Krauss v. A. & M. Karagheusian, Inc., 13 N.J. 447 [ 100 A2d 277 ] (1953).

J. R. Widmer, Inc. v. Department of Revenue

261 Or. 371 · Oregon Supreme Court · Mar 9, 1972

Co. v. … Multnomah County, supra; Douglas Land Co. v. Clatsop County, 87 Or. 462 ( 169 P. 790 ); Weyerhaeuser Land Co. v. Board of Equalization, 85 Or. 434 ( 165 P. 1164 ); Northern Pac. Ry. Co. v.

Karl v. Construction Equipment Co.

132 Or. App. 293 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jan 4, 1995

The Board awarded claimant an additional attorney fee under ORS 656.386(1) for having prevailed on the question of the compensability of medical treatment. On reconsideration, and relying on our opinion in SAIF v. … Allen, 124 Or App 183 , 861 P2d 1018 (1993), the Board withdrew the award of attorney fees, reasoning that the dispute concerned only the payment of medical bills related to a compensable claim. In the light of SAIF v.

Liberty Northwest Insurance v. Cross

109 Or. App. 109 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Oct 2, 1991

Blakely v. SAIF, 89 Or App 653 , 750 P2d 528 , rev den 305 Or 672 (1988). The Board’s finding on predisposition was irrelevant to that test and may be disregarded. See Preston v. … We review only the Board’s order. ORS 656.298(6); ORS 183.482(8). Although the Board affirmed and adopted the referee’s order, it also made its own independent analysis, which replaced the referee’s analysis.