Case law
Opinions from 1658 to today.
10,000+ results
1.91s
92 Or. App. 264 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Aug 3, 1988
Berliner v. Weyerhaeuser Company, 90 Or App 450 , 752 P2d 1246 (1988). The initial issue is whether the Workers’ Compensation Board had authority to republish its October 8, 1986, order. … Employers and insurers cannot set off overpayments without authorization from the Division, a referee or the Board. Spivey v. SAIF, 79 Or App 568, 571 , 720 P2d 755 (1986); Forney v.
Cited 1 timesPublishedMurphy Citizens Advisory Committee v. Josephine County
319 Or. 477 · Oregon Supreme Court · Aug 11, 1994
by the Board of Commissioners.” … See Murphy Citizens Advisory Com. v. Josephine County, 123 Or App 539, 543-45 , 860 P2d 857 (1993) (Warren, P.
Cited 6 timesPublished45 Or. App. 885 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Apr 14, 1980
In Kruger v. … See In re Marriage of Adams, supra; In re Marriage of Brown, 15 Cal 3d 838, 544 P2d 561 , 126 Cal Rptr 633 (1976); Bensing v. Bensing, 25 Cal App 3d 889, 102 Cal Rptr 255 (1972).
Modified by Matter of Marriage of Rogers, 47 Or. App. 963 (1980)Cited 52 timesPublished270 Or. App. 102 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Mar 25, 2015
Jennings v. … See State v.
Cited 2 timesPublished117 Or. App. 37 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Dec 9, 1992
Whitaker v. Bank of Newport, supra; see also Westfall v. Rust International, 314 Or 553 , 840 P2d 700 (1992). … Commencing this action did not oust the Board of jurisdiction.
Cited 2 timesPublished86 Or. App. 46 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jun 24, 1987
Thus, the Board has authority to authorize offsets, Forney v. … Attorney fees payable out of the award are part of a claimant’s compensation, SAIF v.
Cited 2 timesPublished3 Or. App. 303 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jul 23, 1970
She admitted she had forged his name to two checks, which she cashed, but denied an intent to defraud, stating she did so at his request because he was too drunk to sign his own name. *306 In State v. … Frye, 2 Or App 192 , 465 P2d 736 (1970), we said: “The standards which the trial court may expect of its probationers are set forth in Barker v.
Cited 4 timesPublishedMcCormick v. Department of Revenue
10 Or. Tax 380 · Oregon Tax Court · Feb 27, 1987
In Frutiger v. … As recently as Olson v.
Cited 5 timesPublished204 Or. App. 558 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Mar 15, 2006
See State v. McBroom, 179 Or App 120 , 124 n 2, 39 P3d 226 , rev den, 334 Or 397 (2002). … Oregon Peaceworks Green, PAC v.
Cited 6 timesPublished315 Or. App. 647 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Nov 17, 2021
However, the same can be said of many local boards with regard to 1 See Sunshine Dairy v. … See Eckles v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedRobinson v. State Accident Insurance Fund Corp.
69 Or. App. 534 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Aug 29, 1984
See Inkley v. Forest Fiber Products Co., supra, 288 Or at 348 ; Satterfield v. Compensation Dept. 1 Or App 524, 465 P2d 239 (1970). … See Satterfield v. Compensation Dept., supra, 1 Or App at 528 .
Cited 4 timesPublishedPacific Western Co. v. Lincoln County
166 Or. App. 484 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Apr 12, 2000
The court further concluded that, under Strawberry Hill 4 Wheelers v. Benton Co. … Johnson v. Civil Service Board, 161 Or App 489, 498 , 985 P2d 854 , on recons 162 Or App 527 , 986 P2d 666 (1999). We agree with petitioners that the Board misconstrued and thus failed to comply with ORS 368.331.
Cited 1 timesPublished226 Or. App. 45 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Feb 18, 2009
Employer seeks review after the Workers’ Compensation Board (board) ruled that claimant’s injury is compensable. … Fred Meyer, Inc. v. Hayes, 325 Or 592, 596-97 , 943 P2d 197 (1997); Phil A. Livesley Co. v. Russ, 296 Or 25, 28 , 672 P2d 337 (1983). As we concluded in McTaggart v.
Cited 2 timesPublishedOregon School Activities Ass'n v. Stout
71 Or. App. 405 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Dec 19, 1984
“A school board, whether state or local, has only the authority granted to it by statute. Monaghan v. School District No. 1, 211 Or 360 , 315 P2d 797 (1957); Neuhaus v. Federico, 12 Or App 314 , 505 P2d 939 (1973). … See also Whipple v.
Cited 6 timesPublishedIn Re Complaint as to Conduct of Galton
289 Or. 565 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jul 24, 1980
Sadler v. Oregon State Bar, 275 Or 279, 294 , 550 P2d 1218 (1976). More accurately they are codified in ORS 9.460, 9.480 and 9.500 to 9.520. There are additional provisions governing professional conduct. … The review board may adopt, modify or reject the report and any recommendation of a trial board, may take additional evidence or rerefer the matter to a trial board for further proceedings. *568 "(2) The review board shall
Cited 21 timesPublishedMahler v. Department of Revenue
11 Or. Tax 367 · Oregon Tax Court · May 31, 1990
Defendant believes that plaintiff simply filed his petition to the board of equalization late. He was denied relief by the board and, in turn, by the defendant. … Rothenfluch v. Dept. of Rev., 11 OTR 322 (1990). In this case, the taxpayer was not told that the promised notice would extend the time to appeal.
Cited 5 timesPublished32 Or. App. 433 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Feb 7, 1978
Claimant appeals from an order of the Employment Appeals Board denying him unemployment compensation. … The Board’s conclusion that "school attendance creates an inference that an individual is not sufficiently available for work” is inconsistent with our opinion in Petro v.
Cited 3 timesPublished240 Or. App. 378 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jan 12, 2011
Marvin Wood Products v. Callow, 171 Or.App. 175, 183-84 , 14 P.3d 686 (2000). … See Shubert v.
Cited 0 timesPublishedHawes v. State Accident Insurance Fund
6 Or. App. 136 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jul 15, 1971
See Baker v. SIAC, 128 Or 369 . “On the whole of the evidence, however, the Board’s decision seems to me to be fair and reasonable. Claimant was 35 years old at the time of the accident. … Ryf v. Hoffman Construction Co., 254 Or 624 , 89 Adv. Sh. 483, 491 [ 459 P2d 991, 1970 ].
Cited 2 timesPublished332 Or. 404 · Oregon Supreme Court · Aug 16, 2001
An administrative law judge (ALJ) and the Workers’ Compensation Board (Board) held that claimant was entitled to temporary compensation for the period in question. The Court of Appeals reversed. Menasha Corp. v. … Shortly after the Board issued its Crawford decision, the Court of Appeals, in an en banc decision, reversed Bundy. Fred Meyer, Inc. v.
Cited 4 timesPublished
Ask Donna