Case law

Thompson v. United States

745 A.2d 308 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Feb 3, 2000

Thompson and no lookout was for a brown paper bag .... ” Nor did Officer Timlick ever see or recover a brown paper bag from the Nissan. … Brown v. United States, 590 A.2d 1008, 1020 (D.C.1991) (citing Lawrence, 566 A.2d at 60 ). Thompson asserts “that the police seized him without probable cause or reasonable suspicion.”

Carpet, Linoleum, Soft Tile And Resilient Floor Covering Layers, Local Union No. 419, Afl-Cio v. National Labor Relations Board

467 F.2d 392 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jul 28, 1972

Browne, Kansas City, Mo., filed a brief on behalf of the American Retail Federation, as amicus curiae urging affirmance. Mr. James R. … B. v.

Local No. 5, United Ass'n of Journeymen & Apprentices of Plumbing & Pipe Fitting Industry v. National Labor Relations Board

321 F.2d 366 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 6, 1963

Buttressed by a persuasive record, the Board further relies on N. L. R. B. v. Enterprise Association, etc., 285 F.2d 642 (2d Cir., 1960) and Local 636, etc. v. N. L. R. B., 108 U.S.App.D.C. 24 , 278 F.2d 858 (1960). … Local 1976, etc., Carpenters’ Union v. Labor Board, 357 U.S. 93, 105-106 , 78 S.Ct. 1011, 1019 , 2 L.Ed.2d 1186 (1958).

The Cincinnati Newspaper Guild, Local 9, the Newspaper Guild, Afl-Cio, Clc v. National Labor Relations Board

938 F.2d 284 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jul 12, 1991

See, e.g., Struthers Wells Corp. v. … Toledo Typographical Union No. 63 v.

United States v. Browne

District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 22, 2022

Browne appealed. See United States v. Browne, 953 F.3d 794 (D.C. Cir. 2020). On appeal, the D.C. … See Gideon v. Wainwright, 372 U.S. 335 (1963).

Heagney v. Garland

District Court, District of Columbia · May 22, 2025

Browning v. Clinton, 292 F.3d 235, 242 (D.C. Cir. 2002) (cleaned up). … (quoting Brown v. Brody, 199 F.3d 446, 457 (D.C. Cir. 1999))).

Arrington v. United States

382 A.2d 14 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jan 13, 1978

Relying on South Dakota v. Opperman, supra, the government seeks to sustain the seizure and examination of the brown bag and its contents as part of a routine inventory incident to the impoundment of appellant’s car. … See, e. g., Mayfield v. United States, D.C.App., 276 A.2d 123 (1971); United States v. Pannell, D.C.App., 256 A.2d 925 (1969); Williams v. United States, D.C.

National Federation of Federal Employees, Local 1622 v. Harold M. Brown, Individually and as Secretary of Defense, and the Department of Defense, American Federation of Government Employees, Afl-Cio v. Harold M. Brown, Secretary of Defense

645 F.2d 1017 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Apr 1, 1981

(BN 142, 207 U.S.App.D.C. 92 NATIONAL FEDERATION OF FEDERAL EMPLOYEES, LOCAL 1622, Appellant, v. Harold M. BROWN, Individually and As Secretary of Defense, and The Department of Defense, Appellees. … Brown, 481 F.Supp. 704 (D.D.C.1979); American Fed'n of Gov't Employees v. Brown, 481 F.Supp. 711 (D.D.C.1979) 5 5 U.S.C. §§ 5341-5349 (1976 & Supp. III 1979).

Dean v. American Federation of Government Employees, Local 476

549 F. Supp. 2d 115 · District Court, District of Columbia · Apr 27, 2008

Browning-Ferris, 691 F.2d at 1123 ; see also Coles, 471 F.Supp.2d at 50 . … Redd, 232 F.3d at 938 (quoting Browning-Ferris, 691 F.2d at 1123 ). Browning-Ferris describes this test as “essentially a factual issue,” 691 F.2d at 1123 (quoting Boire v.

Collins v. Securities & Exchange Commission

736 F.3d 521 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Nov 26, 2013

COLLINS, PETITIONER v. … United States v. Bajakajian, 524 U.S. 321, 334 (1998).

Morgan v. U.S. Parole Comm'n

304 F. Supp. 3d 240 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Apr 4, 2016

KETANJI BROWN JACKSON, United States District Judge Pro se plaintiff Bobby D. … Board of Parole's 1987 regulations. (Compl. at 3.)

Shoreham Hotel Ltd. Partnership v. Wilder

866 F. Supp. 1 · District Court, District of Columbia · May 12, 1994

The plaintiff alleges that the planning committee was in the nature of a board of directors. … See Hutchins v.

Ellis v. United States

834 A.2d 858 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Oct 23, 2003

Despite the clear teaching of Giles , appellant relies on language in Brown v. … In all events, because Giles was decided before Brown it is Giles , and not Brown , that is binding precedent. See Thomas v.

Locks v. Lew

200 F. Supp. 3d 254 · District Court, District of Columbia · Aug 5, 2016

(citing Brown v. Brody, 199 F.3d 446, 452–55 (D.C. Cir. 1999)). … Id.; see also Weber v. Battista, 494 F.3d 179, 185-86 (D.C. Cir. 2007) (evaluations were “adverse actions insofar as they resulted in her losing a financial award or an award of leave”); Brown v.

District of Columbia v. Heman Ward, Inc.

261 A.2d 836 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Feb 6, 1970

In Kenny Construction Company v. … See, e. g., United States v. Joseph A. Holpuch Co., 328 U.S. 234, 236 , 66 S.Ct. 1000 , 90 L.Ed. 1192 (1946); United States v.

Gross Ex Rel. Spears v. District of Columbia

734 A.2d 1077 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jul 29, 1999

Board of County Comm’rs v. Brown, 520 U.S. 397, 400 , 117 S.Ct. 1382 , 137 L.Ed.2d 626 (1997) (quoting Monell, 436 U.S. at 694 , 98 S.Ct. 2018 ; emphasis in original). … Board of County Comm’rs, supra, 520 U.S. at 405 , 117 S.Ct. 1382 .

Eley v. District of Columbia

District Court, District of Columbia · Aug 24, 2012

J.K. v. Alexandria City School Board, 484 F.3d 672, 681 (4th Cir. 2007). … v. Sch.

Ascom Hasler Mailing Systems, Inc. v. United States Postal Service

815 F. Supp. 2d 148 · District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 30, 2011

Relying on Brown v. … Brown v. Legal Found. of Wash., 538 U.S. at 235.

S. Leon Levy v. Carlton Hayward, Director, Office of Personnel Management, Department of Commerce, and Louis Levine, S. Leon Levy v. W. Ney Evans and John R. Franklin

248 F.2d 152 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Oct 25, 1957

See De Bobula v. Goss, 1951, 90 U.S.App.D.C. 28 , 193 F.2d 35 ; Nalle v. Oyster, 1913, 230 U. S. 165, 182-183 , 33 S.Ct. 1043 , 57 L.Ed. 1439 ; Cunningham v. Brown, 1846, 18 Vt. 123 , 46 Am.Dec. 140; Shultz v. … Appellant relies on Morgan v. Graham, 10 Cir., 1956, 228 F.2d 625 , and Verplanck v.

United States v. Kenroy Laing, A/K/A Junior Roy Laing, United States of America v. Garfield Dean Martin

889 F.2d 281 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Nov 14, 1989

V 1987). Although Brown occasionally received money in exchange for serving as a lookout in front of the apartment, no charge was brought against him. … Regardless of the government’s theory of the case, Brown could have been indicted for his participation and therefore could have been considered an accomplice. See United States v.