Case law

State Accident Insurance Fund Corp. v. Shilling

66 Or. App. 600 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jan 25, 1984

In the first, we affirmed the Board’s original order finding claimant’s disability to be compensable. Shilling v. SAIF; 46 Or App 117 , 610 P2d 845 (1980). … SAIF, supra, 296 Or at 166 ; SAIF v.

Grubb v. JOHNSON

205 Or. 624 · Oregon Supreme Court · Nov 23, 1955

Hurd v. Moore, 2 Or 85 ; Woolley v. Plaindealer Publishing Co., 47 Or 619 , 84 P 473 ; Lowe v. Brown, 114 Or 426 , 233 P 272 , 235 P 395 ; Peck v. Coos Bay Times Pub. Co. et al., 122 Or 408 , 259 P 307 ; Stevens v. … In Samuelson v. Vinyard, the plaintiff, a school teacher, sued the members of the school board for libel. It was said that the case was governed substantially by Ivie v. Minton.

State Accident Insurance Fund Corp. v. Brannon

62 Or. App. 768 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Apr 27, 1983

Van DerZanden v. SAIF, 60 Or App 316 , 653 P2d 558 (1982). In an insurer-initiated appeal, claimant is not entitled to attorney fees if compensation is reduced by the Board. … Here, SAIF prevailed at the Board level on the issue of computation of permanent total disability benefits. Therefore, no attorney fees were authorized. ORS 656.382(2); Korter v.

Kirkendall v. STAMPER'S J & J TIRE COMPANY

18 Or. App. 56 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jun 28, 1974

Swanson v. Westport Lumber Co., supra. Deaton v. … Deaton v. SAIF, supra.

Sexton v. Persson

268 Or. App. 63 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Dec 31, 2014

Board of Parole, 349 Or 461 , 245 P3d 119 (2010), and Janowski/Fleming v. … State v.

Runft v. Saif Corp.

303 Or. 493 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jun 23, 1987

Sahnow v. Fireman’s Fund Ins. Co., 260 Or 564, 568 , 491 P2d 997 (1971). In Runft v. … For that statement the Board cited Syphers v. K-W Logging, Inc., 51 Or App 769 , 627 P2d 24 (1981). In that case, the claimant filed a claim and simultaneously filed a request for hearing.

In re Quartz Gold Mining Co.

157 F. 243 · District Court, D. Oregon · Nov 18, 1907

Citing Rogers v. Pell, 154 N. Y. 527 , 49 N. E. 75 . So in the case of Cresson & Clearfield Coal & Coke Co. v. Stauffer, 148 Fed. 981, 984 , 78 C. C. … Patterson v. Smelting Works, 35 Or. 90 , 105, 56 Pac. 407 .

Reynolds Metals v. Thrasher

133 Or. App. 30 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Feb 15, 1995

Drews v. EBI Companies, supra, 310 Or at 149 ; Hammon Stage Line v. Stinson, 123 Or App 418, 422 , 859 P2d 1180 (1993).” Messmer v. … The Board’s order declining to award compensation for chondromalacia is on review to this court. See Thrasher v. Reynolds Metals, 133 Or App 13 , 889 P2d 1351 (1995).

Dept. of Justice v. Spear

308 Or. 594 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 12, 1989

Johnson v. SAIF, supra. … Frohnmayer, 308 Or 362, 366 , 779 P2d 1028 (1989); Stelljes/Dumler v. State Board of Parole, 307 Or 365, 368 , 769 P2d 177 (1989); but see Deras v.

Ventris v. Maass

99 Or. App. 85 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Oct 25, 1989

A person on parole is not confined and is not serving a sentence in an institution 2 Compare State v. Smith, 95 Or App 76 , 767 P2d 480 , rev den 307 Or 719 (1989). … This case is distinguishable from Erbs v. Board of Parole, 90 Or App 253 , 752 P2d 318 (1988), where the Board attempted to parole an inmate on, rather than before, his good time release date.

Young v. State

47 L.R.A. 548 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jan 29, 1900

Inhabitants of Warren, 82 Mass. (16 Gray) 171 ; Hintze v. Krabbenschmidt (Tex. Civ. App.), 44 S. W. 38 ; Brown v. Brown (Tex. Civ. App.), 36 S. W. 918 . *424 2. It is held in Fenstermacher v. … Law (2 ed.), 328 ; Hamilton v. Brown, 161 U. S. 256 (16 Sup. Ct. 585, 40 L. Ed. 691 ).

Oregon Broadcasting Co. v. Department of Revenue

287 Or. 499 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 2, 1979

An assessed value of either land or improvements must be raised in the appeal to the Board of Equalization. A value not so challenged may not be challenged at some later stage of the tax appeals process. … We adhere to the decision in Domogalla v. Department of Revenue, 283 Or 377 , 584 P2d 256 (1978), that the taxpayer must exhaust his administrative remedies before the Board of Equalization.

Bruce v. SAIF Corp.

149 Or. App. 190 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jul 9, 1997

In Welch v. … Because we cannot tell if the Board applied the correct legal principle, we remand to the Board to clarify and, if necessary, to revise its conclusions. See Tilden v.

Compton v. Weyerhaeuser Co.

302 Or. 366 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 16, 1986

Compton v. Weyerhaeuser, 301 Or 641 , 724 P2d 814 (1986). He petitions for reconsideration from an order of this court, entered October 28, 1986, awarding costs against him. Petitioner relies on Shetterly v. … See Lewis v. Department of Revenue, 294 Or 139 , 653 P2d 1265 (1982). Any entitlement to costs must be found in, and is limited by, statute. State Highway Com. v. Efem Whse. Co., 207 Or 237, 242 , 295 P2d 1101 (1956).

Armstrong v. SAIF Corp.

65 Or. App. 809 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Nov 30, 1983

We dismissed a previous appeal on the ground that it was not brought within 30 days from the mailing of the order of the Workers’ Compensation Board as required by ORS 659.295(8). Armstrong v. … As part of the petitioning process, claimant’s attorney submitted an affidavit to the court stating that the Chairman of the Workers’ Compensation Board had informed him, after our decision, that the Board had discovered

Shipley v. SAIF Corp.

79 Or. App. 149 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Apr 30, 1986

SAIF requested Board review, and the Board held that SAIF has a lien and allocated the proceeds in accordance with the statute. … Any conflict as to what may be a just and proper distribution shall be resolved by the board.” In Wattenbarger v.

Murphy Citizens Advisory Committee v. Josephine County

319 Or. 477 · Oregon Supreme Court · Aug 11, 1994

by the Board of Commissioners.” … See Murphy Citizens Advisory Com. v. Josephine County, 123 Or App 539, 543-45 , 860 P2d 857 (1993) (Warren, P.

Pendleton School Dist. v. State of Oregon

220 Or. App. 56 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · May 14, 2008

the state for the Board of Forestry to manage. … In Yancy , the Supreme Court explained that a controversy is justiciable when “there is an actual and substantial controversy between parties having adverse legal interests.” 337 Or at 349 (quoting Brown v.

Mattila v. Mason

287 Or. 235 · Oregon Supreme Court · Aug 7, 1979

Thus, as held in Bailey v. … Petitioner contends that custodial arrest, and therefore bail, is one of the "indicia” of a criminal prosecution and, as such, is constitutionally impermissible in a traffic infraction case for reasons stated in Brown v.

Care Ambulance Co. v. Multnomah County

97 Or. App. 618 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jul 26, 1989

See Standard Insurance Company v. Washington County, 93 Or App 78 , 761 P2d 534 (1988), pet for rev withdrawn 307 Or 326 (1989). That is the case here. … The court held in a related circuit court action (Care Ambulance Company, Inc. et al v. Multnomah County et al, Multnomah County Circuit Court No.