Case law

Alfa Mutual General Ins. Co. v. Oglesby

711 So. 2d 938 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Dec 19, 1997

Brown once again responded, "I don't know." Rule 61, Ala. R. Civ. … Hutchins v. Shepard , 370 So.2d 275 (Ala. 1979); Brown v. Robinson , 354 So.2d 272 (Ala. 1977); McWhorter v. Clark , 342 So.2d 903 (Ala. 1977); McDuffie v. Hooper , 294 Ala. 293 , 315 So.2d 573 (1975).

Hiett v. State

642 So. 2d 492 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · May 7, 1993

See Brown v. State , 429 So.2d 674 (Ala.Cr.App. 1983)." CR. 10. … Brown , 429 So.2d at 676 .

Fidelity Deposit Co. of Maryland v. Goodwyn

231 Ala. 44 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Jun 20, 1935

State et al. v. Burchfield Bros., 211 Ala. 30 , 99 So. 198 ; Davis v. State ex rel. County Board of Equalization of Cherokee County, 16 Ala. App. 397 , 78 So. 313 . … Blake v. McClung, 172 U. S. 239 , 19 S. Ct. 165 , 43 L. Ed. 432 ; 14a C. J. p. 1265, § 3968. The judgment of the circuit court is affirmed. Affirmed. ANDERSON, C. J., and BROWN and FOSTER, JJ., concur.

United States v. Terrell (In Re Terrell)

75 B.R. 291 · District Court, N.D. Alabama · Mar 3, 1987

United States v. Pomponio, 635 F.2d 293 (4th Cir.1980); Brown v. United States, 591 F.2d 1136 (5th Cir.1979). (See In re Bonner v. … Mazo v. United States, supra at 1155-1156. See also, Feist v. United States, 221 Ct.Cl. 531 , 607 F.2d 954, 961 (1979); Brown v. United States, supra; Sorensen v.

Blue v. Hooks

224 Ala. 696 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Mar 24, 1932

Obear-Nester Glass Co. v. Mobile Drug Co., 208 Ala. 618 , 95 So. 13 ; Dean v. County Board of Education, 210 Ala. 256, 260 , 97 So. 741 . … J., and BROWN and KNIGHT, JJ„ concur.

Wilbanks v. Brazil

425 So. 2d 1123 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Jan 28, 1983

In Brown v. … (See the elements of negligent entrustment stated in Brown v. Vanity Fair Mills, Inc. , supra.) Thus, we find that summary judgment was properly granted in this cause. AFFIRMED.

State Bd. of Optometry v. Lee Optical Co. of Al, Inc.

287 Ala. 528 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Sep 23, 1971

The original bill was filed November 9, 1965 and was styled “State Board of Optometry, Complainant v. Lee Optical Company of Alabama, Inc. * * * ” et al., Respondents. … of any profession, occupation, or calling.’ ” State Board of Optometry v.

Heard v. State

999 So. 2d 982 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · Mar 18, 2005

"`); Allen v. … Dorsey v.

Marshall Durbin & Co. of Jasper v. Alabama Department of Environmental Management

537 So. 2d 499 · Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · Dec 21, 1988

Ex Parte Capstone Development Corporation

779 So. 2d 1216 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Sep 1, 2000

Supp. 555 (S.D.N.Y. 1979), where an earlier dismissal of a shareholders' derivative action for failure to make a demand on the board of directors was held not to have a preclusive effect. Bazata v. National Ins. … Hooper, C.J., and Maddox, Houston, Cook, See, Lyons, Brown, Johnstone, and England, JJ., concur.

Monterious Tyler v. Alabama Board of Pardons and Paroles and Debra Kizer, Circuit Court Clerk (Appeal from Montgomery Circuit Court: CV-23-501)

Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · Nov 4, 2024

ALABAMA COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS November 4, 2024 CR-2024-0353 Monterious Tyler v. … Alabama Board of Pardons and Paroles and Debra Kizer, Circuit Court Clerk (Appeal from Montgomery Circuit Court: CV-23-501) NOTICE You are hereby notified that on November 4, 2024

Yelverton v. Vargo

386 F. Supp. 2d 1224 · District Court, M.D. Alabama · Sep 7, 2005

In Vinyard, v. … See Troupe v.

Barze v. Holbrook

184 So. 3d 1012 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Jun 26, 2015

See also Wilson v. … Corp. v. Milam & Co. Constr,, Inc., 901 So.2d 84 (Ala.2004); Johnson v. Willis, 893 So.2d 1138 (Ala.2004); and Zaden v. Elkus, 881 So.2d 993 (Ala.2003).

Long v. Roberts & Son

234 Ala. 570 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Jun 24, 1937

that question sufficiently dealt with in State Tax Commission v. … J., and THOMAS, BOULDIN, BROWN, FOSTER, and KNIGHT, JJ., concur as herein indicated. GARDNER, J., dissents in part. 1 Ante, p. 556. 2 Ante, p. 150.

Fincher v. State

724 So. 2d 87 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · Aug 28, 1998

Unfortunately, Brown v. … We overrule Brown v. State , 677 So.2d 1266 (Ala.Cr.App. 1996), to the extent that it imposes written findings of fact that are not required by the rule.

Simmons v. Mobile County Board of School Commissioners

District Court, S.D. Alabama · Dec 18, 2023

See Smith v. … V. CONCLUSION For the reasons set forth herein, the Board’s Motion for Summary Judgment, (Doc. 37), is GRANTED.

Reynolds v. Rutland

365 So. 2d 656 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Dec 22, 1978

In Smith v. … Smith v. Brown , supra. It appears that, in the present case, Appellees never intended to claim property belonging to another, but only intended to hold to the true line.

Barrett v. Roman

143 So. 3d 144 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Nov 22, 2013

Baugus v. … [v. Player, 869 So.2d 1146, 1148 (Ala.Civ.App.2003) ] (quoting Harper Sales Co. v. Brown, Stagner, Richardson, Inc., 742 So.2d 190, 192 (Ala.Civ.App.1999), quoting in turn Brown v.

Clancy v. State

107 So. 3d 1118 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · Mar 23, 2012

Brown v. Birmingham, 140 Ala. [590,] 600, 37 South. [173,] 174 [(1904)]. “His remedy at law is plain, adequate, and complete by way of establishing and having his innocence adjudged in the criminal court.” Id.’ … “Board of Comm’rs of Mobile v. Orr, 181 Ala. 308, 318 , 61 So. 920, 923 (1913).

Paterson & Edey Lumber Co. v. Bank of Mobile

203 Ala. 536 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Dec 18, 1919

Co. v. … J., and MeCLELDAN and BROWN, JJ., concur. 1 199 Ala. 612 . 2 202 Ala. 274 . 3 Ante, p. 325. 4 202 Ala. 335 . 5 199 Ala. 536 . 6 202 Ala. 552 .