Case law

Hall v. Employment Division

31 Or. App. 79 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Oct 4, 1977

The foregoing facts are among those found by the Appeals Board. … See Cantrell v. Employment Division, supra.

Berliner v. Weyerhaeuser Co.

92 Or. App. 264 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Aug 3, 1988

Berliner v. Weyerhaeuser Company, 90 Or App 450 , 752 P2d 1246 (1988). The initial issue is whether the Workers’ Compensation Board had authority to republish its October 8, 1986, order. … Employers and insurers cannot set off overpayments without authorization from the Division, a referee or the Board. Spivey v. SAIF, 79 Or App 568, 571 , 720 P2d 755 (1986); Forney v.

Murphy Citizens Advisory Committee v. Josephine County

319 Or. 477 · Oregon Supreme Court · Aug 11, 1994

by the Board of Commissioners.” … See Murphy Citizens Advisory Com. v. Josephine County, 123 Or App 539, 543-45 , 860 P2d 857 (1993) (Warren, P.

Hostetler v. Eccles

112 Or. 572 · Oregon Supreme Court · Nov 18, 1924

Cas. 1135); Harris v. Frink, 49 N. Y. 24 ( 10 Am. Rep. 318 ); Reeder v. Sayre, 70 N. Y. 180 ( 26 Am. Rep. 567 ); Bittinger v. Baker, 29 Pa. St. 66 (70 Am. Dec. 154); Sievers v. Brown, 34 Or. 454 ( 56 Pac. 171 , 45 L. R. … J., and Bean and Brown, JJ., concur.

Matter of Marriage of Rogers

45 Or. App. 885 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Apr 14, 1980

In Kruger v. … See In re Marriage of Adams, supra; In re Marriage of Brown, 15 Cal 3d 838, 544 P2d 561 , 126 Cal Rptr 633 (1976); Bensing v. Bensing, 25 Cal App 3d 889, 102 Cal Rptr 255 (1972).

Menasha Corp. v. Crawford

332 Or. 404 · Oregon Supreme Court · Aug 16, 2001

An administrative law judge (ALJ) and the Workers’ Compensation Board (Board) held that claimant was entitled to temporary compensation for the period in question. The Court of Appeals reversed. Menasha Corp. v. … Shortly after the Board issued its Crawford decision, the Court of Appeals, in an en banc decision, reversed Bundy. Fred Meyer, Inc. v.

State v. Lusareta

270 Or. App. 102 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Mar 25, 2015

Jennings v. … See State v.

Weyerhaeuser Co. v. Sheldon

86 Or. App. 46 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jun 24, 1987

Thus, the Board has authority to authorize offsets, Forney v. … Attorney fees payable out of the award are part of a claimant’s compensation, SAIF v.

Fred Meyer, Inc. v. Hofstetter

151 Or. App. 21 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Oct 22, 1997

Employer seeks review of an order of the Workers’ Compensation Board (Board) in which the Board set aside employer’s denial of claimant’s claim and remanded the claim for processing. … Wright Schuchart Harbor v. Johnson, 133 Or App 680, 685 , 893 P2d 560 (1995).

McCormick v. Department of Revenue

10 Or. Tax 380 · Oregon Tax Court · Feb 27, 1987

In Frutiger v. … As recently as Olson v.

Medford Irr. Dist. v. Hill

96 Or. 649 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jul 6, 1920

Co. v. … v.

Havi Group LP v. Fyock

204 Or. App. 558 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Mar 15, 2006

See State v. McBroom, 179 Or App 120 , 124 n 2, 39 P3d 226 , rev den, 334 Or 397 (2002). … Oregon Peaceworks Green, PAC v.

State v. Deal

43 Or. 17 · Oregon Supreme Court · Nov 3, 1902

That the instruction described the subject of the larceny at the first trial as a brown gelding does not vitiate it. … Ev. (8 ed.) p. *52; Williams v. State, 52 Ala. 411 ; Sayres v. State, 30 Ala. 15 ; Belt v. State, 103 Ga. 12 ( 29 S. E. 451 ).

YRC Worldwide, Inc. v. Corrigan

Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jul 10, 2024

BACKGROUND We draw the background facts from the board’s fac- tual findings, which the parties do not challenge on judicial review. See King v. … Luper v.

Robinson v. State Accident Insurance Fund Corp.

69 Or. App. 534 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Aug 29, 1984

See Inkley v. Forest Fiber Products Co., supra, 288 Or at 348 ; Satterfield v. Compensation Dept. 1 Or App 524, 465 P2d 239 (1970). … See Satterfield v. Compensation Dept., supra, 1 Or App at 528 .

Pacific Western Co. v. Lincoln County

166 Or. App. 484 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Apr 12, 2000

The court further concluded that, under Strawberry Hill 4 Wheelers v. Benton Co. … Johnson v. Civil Service Board, 161 Or App 489, 498 , 985 P2d 854 , on recons 162 Or App 527 , 986 P2d 666 (1999). We agree with petitioners that the Board misconstrued and thus failed to comply with ORS 368.331.

SAIF Corp. v. Uptegrove

226 Or. App. 45 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Feb 18, 2009

Employer seeks review after the Workers’ Compensation Board (board) ruled that claimant’s injury is compensable. … Fred Meyer, Inc. v. Hayes, 325 Or 592, 596-97 , 943 P2d 197 (1997); Phil A. Livesley Co. v. Russ, 296 Or 25, 28 , 672 P2d 337 (1983). As we concluded in McTaggart v.

Oregon School Activities Ass'n v. Stout

71 Or. App. 405 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Dec 19, 1984

“A school board, whether state or local, has only the authority granted to it by statute. Monaghan v. School District No. 1, 211 Or 360 , 315 P2d 797 (1957); Neuhaus v. Federico, 12 Or App 314 , 505 P2d 939 (1973). … See also Whipple v.

In Re Complaint as to Conduct of Galton

289 Or. 565 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jul 24, 1980

Sadler v. Oregon State Bar, 275 Or 279, 294 , 550 P2d 1218 (1976). More accurately they are codified in ORS 9.460, 9.480 and 9.500 to 9.520. There are additional provisions governing professional conduct. … The review board may adopt, modify or reject the report and any recommendation of a trial board, may take additional evidence or rerefer the matter to a trial board for further proceedings. *568 "(2) The review board shall

Dach v. Employment Division

32 Or. App. 433 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Feb 7, 1978

Claimant appeals from an order of the Employment Appeals Board denying him unemployment compensation. … The Board’s conclusion that "school attendance creates an inference that an individual is not sufficiently available for work” is inconsistent with our opinion in Petro v.