Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

FiltersMA

10,000+ results

0.96s

  • Belfer v. Building Commissioner of Boston

    363 Mass. 439 · Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · Apr 4, 1973

    See Begley v. Board of Appeal of Boston, 349 Mass. 458, 460 ; McNeely v. Board of Appeal of Boston, 358 Mass. 94, 106 . … See Damaskos v. Board of Appeal of Boston, 359 Mass. 55, 63-64 . Broderick v. Board of Appeal of Boston, 361 Mass. 472, 474, 475 .

    Cited 37 timesPublished
  • Reynolds v. McDermott

    264 Mass. 158 · Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · Jun 16, 1928

    but who could be removed by the board for cause which they deemed sufficient; citing O’Dowd v. … Boston, 149 Mass. 443, 445 ; Lacy v. Selectmen of Winchendon, 240 Mass. 118, 120 ; Bailen v.

    Cited 14 timesPublished
  • Commonwealth v. Semedo

    456 Mass. 1 · Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · Feb 4, 2010

    The long brown van was no longer on Clarence Street. … We refer to Jorge Fidalgo as the victim and to Antonio Fidalgo by his full name. 5 The van is variously described as “brown,” “reddish-brown,” “maroon,” or “red.”

    Cited 47 timesPublished
  • Bean's Case

    227 Mass. 558 · Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · Jun 27, 1917

    Groves v. Burroughes & Watts, Ltd. 4 B. W. C. C. 185. In the Superior Court the employer moved to recommit the case to the Industrial Accident Board to correct and amplify the report. It was ordered: "1. … The question of recommitting the case to the Industrial Accident Board was within the discretion of the judge and his discretion will not be revised by this court. Cunningham v.

    Cited 13 timesPublished
  • Read & Lundy, Inc. v. Brier (In Re Brier)

    274 B.R. 37 · United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Massachusetts · Feb 26, 2002

    In McAlister v. … Brown (In re Brown), 237 B.R. 740 (Bankr.C.D.Cal.1999), the bankruptcy court determined that the debtor was collaterally estopped from relitigating a judgment arising out of the debtor’s misappropriation of trade secrets

    Cited 20 timesPublished
  • Ahmed's Case

    278 Mass. 180 · Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · Jan 26, 1932

    In the DiFelici case the award made by the board member was diminished by the reviewing board. … by the board member.

    Cited 63 timesPublished
  • Providence & Worcester Railroad v. Norwich & Worcester Railroad

    138 Mass. 277 · Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · Jan 13, 1885

    Housatonic Railroad v. Lee & Hudson Railroad, 118 Mass. 391 . Worcester & Nashua Railroad v. Railroad Commissioners, 118 Mass. 561 . Boston & Maine Railroad v. Lowell & Lawrence Railroad, 124 Mass. 368 . … Fall River Iron Works v. Old Colony & Fall River Railroad, 5 Allen, 221 . Springfield v. Connecticut River Railroad, 4 Cush. 63 .

    Cited 9 timesPublished
  • Koch v. Commissioner of Revenue

    416 Mass. 540 · Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · Dec 14, 1993

    In reviewing mixed questions of fact and law, the board’s expertise in tax matters must be recognized, and its decisions are due “some deference.” McCarthy v. … M & T Charters, Inc. v. Commissioner of Revenue, supra at 140.

    Cited 39 timesPublished
  • MARIO MARIANI & Others v. PLANNING BOARD OF DENNIS & Another.

    Massachusetts Appeals Court · Aug 25, 2023

    Murray v. Board of Appeals of Barnstable, 22 Mass. App. Ct. 473, 476 (1986). See G. L. c. 40A, § 17. … Bertrand v. Board of Appeals of Bourne, 58 Mass. App. Ct. 912 (2003).

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • United States v. Malouf

    377 F. Supp. 2d 315 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Jun 14, 2005

    One commentator described a similar dilemma after Brown v. Board of Education, 347 U.S. 483 , 74 S.Ct. 686 , 98 L.Ed. 873 (1954): Brown v. … Two challenges to segregation policies on buses followed the Brown decision. At the time those cases arose, the Supreme Court had not expressly overruled Plessy v.

    Cited 12 timesPublished
  • Fort Pond Inn Co. v. Director of the Division of Employment Security

    324 Mass. 281 · Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · Apr 29, 1949

    The findings of fact of the board of review are conclusive, “if supported by any evidence.” Wagstaff v. Director of the Division of Employment Security, 322 Mass. 664, 665 . … Co. v. Commissioner of Insurance, 298 Mass. 161, 167-168 ; Graves v. School Committee of Wellesley, 299 Mass. 80, 84-87 ; Boott Mills v.

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • DePasquale v. Ogden Suffolk Downs, Inc.

    29 Mass. App. Ct. 658 · Massachusetts Appeals Court · Dec 31, 1990

    However, G.L.c. 93A, § 3, as appearing in St. 1983, c. 242, provides: "Nothing in this chapter shall apply to transactions or actions otherwise permitted under laws as administered *663 by any regulatory board or officer … See Leardi v. Brown, 394 Mass. 151 , 157-162 *664 162 (1985). For the reasons stated in this opinion, the plaintiff may not recover the winnings of the Twin-Trifecta.

    Cited 10 timesPublished
  • Gorski's Case

    227 Mass. 456 · Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · Jun 27, 1917

    The paper on which the claim, with the details set forth in the statute, is written actually must be delivered physically into the possession of the board before it can be said to be filed with the board. Chapin v. … See New Monckton Collieries, Ltd. v. Keeling, [1911] A. C. 648. This matter does not seem to have been the subject of much attention at the hearing either by the arbitration committee or by the board.

    Cited 44 timesPublished
  • Commissioner of Revenue v. McGraw-Hill, Inc.

    383 Mass. 397 · Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · Apr 14, 1981

    However, the board is “still bound by ‘general principles affecting administrative decisions and judicial review of them.’ ” New Bedford Gas & Edison Light Co. v. … Commonwealth v. Olivo, 369 Mass. 62 , 67 n.4 (1975), quoting from Eastern Mass. St. Ry. v. Massachusetts Bay Transp.

    Cited 15 timesPublished
  • Cohen v. Samuel Bent LLC

    111 F. Supp. 2d 65 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Aug 11, 2000

    Under NLRB v. … It relies primarily upon Allentown Mack Sales & Service, Inc. v.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Munkley v. Hoyt

    179 Mass. 108 · Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · May 23, 1901

    In Commonwealth v. … The second is Commonwealth v.

    Cited 12 timesPublished
  • Sinclair v. Director of the Division of Employment Security

    331 Mass. 101 · Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · Jan 29, 1954

    Moran v. School Committee of Little-ton, 317 Mass. 591, 596-597 , and eases cited. National Labor Relations Board v. Service Wood Heel Co. Inc. 124 Fed. (2d) 470, 472. Cantrell v. … New York State Labor Relations Board v. Select Operating Corp. 183 Misc. (N. Y.) 480, 483-484. Phillips v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, 152 Pa. Super. Ct. 75, 82-83 .

    Cited 34 timesPublished
  • Telecorp Realty, LLC v. Town of Edgartown

    81 F. Supp. 2d 257 · District Court, D. Massachusetts · Jan 18, 2000

    See Cellular Telephone Co. v. … Relying on Board of Aldermen of Newton v.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • The Clement

    5 F. Cas. 1015 · U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · May 15, 1855

    Fenwick v. Bell, 1 Car. & K. 312. would, perhaps, justify such a question; but Sills v. Brown, 9 Car. & P. 601, is the other way; and in The Ann and Mary, 2 W. Rob. … S. v. McGlue [Case No. 15,679]; Rex v. Searle, 1 Moody & R. 75; Rex v. Wright, Russ. & R. 456; Com. v. Rogers, 7 MetC. [Mass.] 500.

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Bell Atlantic Mobile of Massachusetts Corp. v. Commissioner of Revenue

    451 Mass. 280 · Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · Apr 28, 2008

    We granted Bell Atlantic Mobile’s application for direct appellate review, and we affirm the decision of the board. 8 Discussion. Our review of a board decision is limited to questions of law. Towle v. … See FMR Corp. v. Commissioner of Revenue, 441 Mass. 810, 819 (2004), quoting Board of Educ. v.

    Cited 12 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.