Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

FiltersTN

10,000+ results

5.87s

  • Shoup Voting MacHine, Corp. v. Hamilton County

    178 Tenn. 14 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Jun 28, 1941

    It should be noted that in *18 so far as a'judicial officer is concerned, in Beaver v. Hall, 142 Tenn., 416 , 217 S. W., 649 , this conrt refused to apply the doctrine of Ruohs v. Athens and the authority of Ruohs v. … In that case, although two of a school board of three were ineligible to membership, nevertheless they were assuming, under color of right, with public acquiescence, to act as members of the board.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • State Ex Rel. Melton v. Nolan

    161 Tenn. 293 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Jul 19, 1930

    Marr v. Bank, 72 Tenn., 585 ; Shield v. Land Co., 94 Tenn., 148 . 5. … Edmondson v. The Board, 108 Tenn., 565 . 8. That it is violative of the Fourth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States in that it provides for unreasonable search and seizure.

    Cited 22 timesPublished
  • Grace Fellowhip Church v. Lenoir City Beer Bd. & KVAT Food Stores, Inc.

    Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Oct 15, 2001

    League Central Credit Union v. Mottern, 660 S.W.2d 787, 791 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1983). Also see: Bennett v. Sutts, 621 S.W.2d 575 (Tenn. 1975). … See Cagle v. Wheeler, 242 S.W.2d 338 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1951), Foust v. May, 660 S.W.2d 487 (Tenn. 1983); First Tenn. Bank Nat. Ass’n. V. Athletic Ind. Intern.,Inc., 1989 WL37261 (Tenn. Ct. App.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Gilbert Olerud v. Dr. Walter M. Morgan, III

    Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Feb 18, 2011

    Wilson v. Wilson, 987 S.W.2d 555, 562 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1998). … Alley v. State, 882 S.W.2d 810, 820 (Tenn. Crim. App. 1994).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Arlon Way v. Jim Hall & The Cumberland County Bd. of Ed.

    Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Feb 13, 2001

    Accord: Enochs v. Nerren, 949 S.W.2d 686 (Tenn. Ct. App. 1996) and Lannom v. Board of Education, 2000 WL 243971 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2000). … Courts should be reluctant to substitute their judgment for the judgment of the Board unless the Board’s judgment violates the law. Childs v. Roane County Board of Education, 929 S.W.2d 364 (Tenn. Ct.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Rutherford Co. Bd. of Ed. v. Rutherford Co. Comm.

    Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Jan 31, 2000

    of education.@ State ex rel Boles. v. … .@ Shankle v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • HOLLAND, JUDITH v. RANDSTAD

    2025 TN WC 89 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Dec 10, 2025

    Orman v. Williams Sonoma, Inc., 803 S.W.2d 672, 676 (Tenn. 1991). As shown below, all the factors favor Dr. Schroerlucke. Dr. … Schroerlucke’s specific board certification as a spine surgeon favors him on the factor of qualifications. Drs. Lochemes and Lager are board-certified orthopedic surgeons but without a certification in spine surgery.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Matlock v. Simpson

    902 S.W.2d 384 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Feb 13, 1995

    Roberts v. Chase, supra; Richmond v. Christian, 555 S.W.2d 105 (Tenn.1977); Hogan v. Cooper, 619 S.W.2d 516 (Tenn.1981); Brown v. Weik, 725 S.W.2d 938 (Tenn.App.1983); Estate of Depriest v. … Green, 622 S.W.2d 829 (Tenn.App.1981); Owen v. Stanley, 739 S.W.2d 782 (Tenn.App.1987); Reynolds v. Day, 792 S.W.2d 924 (Tenn.App.1990); Crain v. Brown, 823 S.W.2d 187 (Tenn.App.1991).

    Cited 122 timesPublished
  • State of Tennessee v. Andre Davis, Jr.

    Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · Nov 15, 2024

    See State v. Sheffield, 676 S.W.2d 542, 547 (Tenn. 1984); State v. Cabbage, 571 S.W.2d 832, 835 (Tenn. 1978). … State v. Sisk, 343 S.W.3d 60, 67 (Tenn. 2011).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Louchi, Fatima v. All Star Personnel, LLC

    2024 TN WC 31 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Apr 9, 2024

    IN THE COURT OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION CLAIMS AT NASHVILLE Fatima Louchi, ) Docket No. 2021-06-1239 Employee, ) v. … The Court Clerk will prepare the record for submission to the Appeals Board, and you will receive notice once it has been submitted.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • EILAND, STEPHEN v. LABOR FINDERS OF TENNESSEE

    2026 TN WC 67 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · May 15, 2026

    Code Ann. § 50-6-239(d)(1) (2025); McCord v. Advantage Human Resourcing, 2015 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. … The Court Clerk will prepare the record for submission to the Appeals Board, and you will receive notice once it has been submitted.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Consolidated Aluminum Corp. v. Tennessee Valley Authority

    462 F. Supp. 464 · District Court, M.D. Tennessee · Jun 30, 1978

    Board of Regents v. Roth, 408 U.S. 564, 576-77 , 92 S.Ct. 2701 , 33 L.Ed.2d 548 (1972); Sims v. … In Mathews v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • MEENER, MUSSHUR v. v. FEDERAL EXPRESS HUB

    2025 TN WC 74 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Oct 27, 2025

    However, the Appeals Board held that an employee’s “subjective belief, no matter how sincerely held, is not a sufficient basis to support his claim for workers’ compensation benefits.” Rucker v. … Frye v. Vincent Printing Co., 2016 TN Wrk. Comp. App. Bd. LEXIS 34, at *15-16 (Aug. 2, 2016).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • McGauvran, James v. ATOS Syntel, Inc.

    2021 TN WC 225 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Sep 10, 2021

    ATOS appealed, and the Appeals Board vacated and remanded. … The Appeals Board has held that “a decision to award attorneys’ fees and expenses at an interlocutory stage of a case should be made only in extremely limited circumstances.” Travis v. Carter Express, 2019 TN Wrk. Comp.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Mitchell, Michael v. Bunge North America

    2019 TN WC App. 17 · Tennessee Workers' Compensation Appeals Board · Apr 16, 2019

    Corp. v. Wells, 578 S.W.2d 369, 373 (Tenn. 1979)). … Brown v. Zurich Am. Ins. Co., No. E2016-00237-SC-R3-WC, 2017 Tenn. LEXIS 267, at *7 (Tenn. Workers’ Comp. Panel Apr. 21, 2017).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • State of Tennessee v. Henry Zillon Felts

    Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · Aug 25, 2006

    Brown where the gun lay at the street corner. Ryan Brown, the son of Geoffrey Brown, testified that he also saw the defendant on May 5. … See State v. Sheffield, 676 S.W.2d 542, 547 (Tenn. 1984); State v. Cabbage, 571 S.W.2d 832, 835 (Tenn . 1978). Questions concerning witness credibility were resolved by the jury. See State v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Wiley Hutcherson v. Rozell Carter

    Court of Appeals of Tennessee · Jul 12, 1999

    Board of Comm’rs, 806 S.W.2d 181, 187 (Tenn. App. 1990) (citing Henry v. White, 194 Tenn. 192, 250 S.W.2d 70 (1951); State ex rel. Lightman v. City of Nashville, 166 Tenn. 191, 60 S.W.2d 161 (1933)). … Trainor v. City of Wheat Ridge, 697 P.2d 37, 39 (Colo. App. 1984) (citing Edel v. Filer Township, 49 Mich. App. 210, 211 N.W.2d 547 (1973); Taylor v. Schlemmer, 353 Mo. 687, 183 S.W.2d 913 (1944); Struyk v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Jones v. Planters Bank of Tennessee

    56 Tenn. 455 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Apr 15, 1872

    No other business being before the Board, on motion the Board adjourned.” … Puryear, Adm., v. McGavock et als., MS., * Nashville, 1871.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Goodwin v. Guild

    27 L.R.A. 660 · Tennessee Supreme Court · Mar 1, 1895

    The doctrine is tersely stated in Kendall v. Stokes, 3 How. (U. … As was said in Sparta v. Lewis, 7 Pick., 374 , “it is not a trial between the State and defendant, nor on a presentment or indictment by *493 and before a jury; but it is in the nature of a suit for debt.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • MOORE, ERIN V. AMAZON.COM SERVICES, LLC

    2025 TN WC 83 · Tennessee Court of Workers' Compensation Claims · Nov 24, 2025

    .: 2025-60-2991 Employee, ) v. ) State File No.: 16015-2025 ) AMAZON.COM SERVICES, … The Court Clerk will prepare the record for submission to the Appeals Board, and you will receive notice once it has been submitted.

    Cited 0 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.