Case law

Cooper v. City of Creve Coeur

556 S.W.2d 717 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Sep 6, 1977

with his witnesses, to be heard before the board of aldermen sitting as a board of impeachment. … Kendall v. Wilson, 151 Mo.App. 719 , 132 S.W. 623 (1910). Plaintiff cites Moore v. Damos, 489 S.W.2d 465, 468 (Mo.App.1972); Heidebur v. Parker, 505 S.W.2d 440 (Mo.App.1974); and Davis v.

Preisler v. Doherty

364 Mo. 596 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Mar 8, 1954

Barrett v. Hitchcock, 241 Mo. 433 , 146 S. … W. (2) 315, Morris v. Wrightson, 56 N. J. Law 126, 28 Atl. 56 , Jones v. Freeman, supra.

Sheehan v. First National Bank

346 Mo. 227 · Supreme Court of Missouri · May 7, 1940

Soc. v. Schoen (Mo.), 93 S.W.2d 669 ; State ex rel. Equality Sav. Bldg. Assn. v. Brown, 334 Mo. 781 , 68 S.W.2d 55 , and cases cited; Kingshighway Presbyterian Church v. … Missouri State Board of Agriculture v. Woods, 317 Mo. 403 , 296 S.W. 381 ; and the many other cases cited in 7 Mo. Digest, 254-257, sec. 42.]

State v. Birks

199 Mo. 263 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Nov 20, 1906

[State v. Furgerson, supra; State v. Hagan, 164 Mo. l. c. 658; State v. Williams, 184 Mo. 261 ; State v. Woodward, 191 Mo. 617 .] … The case of State v.

Ann McGruder v. Curators of the University of Missouri

Missouri Court of Appeals · Jan 19, 2021

Smith and the Board members informed McGruder that the Foundation was experiencing financial difficulties. … Husch & Eppenberger, LLC v. Eisenberg, 213 S.W.3d 124, 134 (Mo. App. E.D. 2006); accord Brown v. Mickelson, 220 S.W.3d 442, 448 (Mo. App. W.D. 2007).

Mullins v. Kansas City

268 Mo. 444 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jul 5, 1916

V. … [Lamar Twp. v. Lamar, 261 Mo. 171 ; Morrow v.

State ex rel. Twenty-Second Judicial Circuit v. Jones

823 S.W.2d 471 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jan 17, 1992

Weinstein v. St. … Jacobsmeyer v.

State v. Barnes

345 S.W.2d 130 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Apr 10, 1961

State v. Sarkis, supra; State v. Bright, supra. … State v. Morton, Mo.Sup., 338 S.W.2d 858, 861 (3); State v. Griffin, supra; State v. Wolfe, Mo.Sup., 343 S.W.2d 10 ; State v. Williams, Mo.Sup., 343 S.W.2d 58 ; State v. Chamineak, Mo.Sup., 343 S.W.2d 153 .

State v. Bryson

506 S.W.2d 358 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Mar 11, 1974

He opened the brown paper and found a plastic syringe with a needle and some tablets soaking in a yellow watery substance. … In State v.

DeSilva v. Director, Division of Aging, Department of Social Services

714 S.W.2d 690 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jun 10, 1986

Preliminarily, we note that it is the Board’s decision, not the judgment of the circuit court, that is the subject of review by this court. Holt v. Personnel Advisory Board, 679 S.W.2d 340, 342 (Mo.App.1984). … King v. Laclede Gas Co., 648 S.W.2d 113, 114 (Mo. banc 1983). See also Ceramo Co., Inc. v.

State Ex Rel. Mitchell v. Dalton

831 S.W.2d 942 · Missouri Court of Appeals · May 19, 1992

In addition, the Board still must determine whether a parole would be in the best interest of society. Thus, its relationship to the offender is “supervisory in nature, not adversarial.” Smith v. … Respondent cites State ex rel Div. of Adult Institution v.

State v. Black

677 S.W.2d 907 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Aug 21, 1984

State v. Cleveland, 627 S.W.2d 600, 601 (Mo. banc 1982). However to the extent possible we have reviewed to determine whether the defendant’s confession was voluntarily made. … State v. Thornton, 557 S.W.2d 1, 3 (Mo.App.1977). The judgment of the trial court is affirmed. KAROHL, P.J., and CRANDALL, J., concur.

Dalton v. Simpson

270 Mo. 287 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Mar 12, 1917

In Simpson v. … [Rhorer v. Brockhage, 86 Mo. 544 ; Simpson v. Scroggins, 182 Mo. l. c. 571, 574; Quail v. Lomas, 200 Mo. l. c. 687.]” That ease coincides in all respects with the one before us. It comments on Beckner v.

Polk Tp., Sullivan County v. Spencer

364 Mo. 97 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Jun 8, 1953

In Nodaway County v. … Witmer v. Nichols, supra; Smith v. Hendricks, supra; Smith v. Dandridge, supra; Seaman v. Cap-Au-Gris Levee Dist., supra; Sparks v. Jasper County, 213 Mo. 218 , 112 S. W. 265 ; Inhabitants df Schell City v. Rumsey Mfg.

Naseer v. Islamic Foundation of Greater St. Louis Executive Board

District Court, E.D. Missouri · Apr 3, 2024

Louis Executive Board, as well as several individual defendants who appear to be board members. … Louis Executive Board, as well as several individual defendants who appear to be board members. [ECF No. 1].

State v. DeWeese

79 S.W.3d 456 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jul 16, 2002

State v. Bozarth, 51 S.W.3d 179, 181 (Mo.App.2001). The Supreme Court suggested in State v. … Brown, 902 S.W.2d at 284 . “The rule makes it clear that not all prejudicial error — that is, reversible error — can be deemed plain error.” State v. Dowell, 25 S.W.3d 594, 606 (Mo.App.2000).

State Ex Rel. Cavallaro v. Groose

908 S.W.2d 133 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Oct 24, 1995

Ingrassia v. Purkett, 985 F.2d 987, 988 (8th Cir.1993); Maggard v. Wyrick, 800 F.2d 195, 198 (8th Cir.1986), cert. denied, 479 U.S. 1068 , 107 S.Ct. 958 , 93 L.Ed.2d 1006 (1987); Green v. … The Board denied Cavallaro parole release based on the “seriousness of the offense.” This is a valid reason under either the old or new statute. Cooper v.

City of St. Louis v. Handlan

242 Mo. 88 · Supreme Court of Missouri · Mar 29, 1912

Jones may like straight lines; Brown, curves; Smith, broken lines. … Thereto all the lexicographers agree (q. v.).

Sanford v. State

766 S.W.2d 652 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Dec 27, 1988

See Glover v. State, 528 S.W.2d 507, 509 [2] (Mo.App.1975). Moreover, movant’s allegation that Brown was the person known by the police to have truly committed the crime is a bare conclusion. … Movant fails to state which police officer knew Brown to be guilty or what facts supported this officer’s belief of the same. See Todd v.

Phares v. Jaynes Lumber Co.

118 Mo. App. 546 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Jun 4, 1906

[Keene v. Sappington, 90 S. W. 752 , 115 Mo. App. 33 ; Brashears v. Strock, 46 Mo. 221 ; Maxwell v. Quimby, 90 Mo. App. 469 ; Lamb v. Bush, 49 Mo. App. 337 ; Corson v. Waller, 104 Mo. App. 621 ; Weese v. … Brown, 102 Mo. 299 .] There is nothing in Adler v. Railroad, 110 Mo. App. 339 , in conflict with our present conclusion.