Case law

Does v. District of Columbia

374 F. Supp. 2d 107 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 16, 2005

Brown Dep. at 36, 75, 88-89. … Brown Dep. at 75 (emphasis added).

Mintz v. Federal Deposit Insurance

729 F. Supp. 2d 276 · District Court, District of Columbia · Aug 6, 2010

See Kowal v. MCI Communications Corp., 16 F.3d at 1276 ; Browning v. Clinton, 292 F.3d 235, 242 (D.C.Cir.2002). . B. Liability of the FDIC Mr. … ]•” Browning v. Clinton, 292 F.3d at 242 (citation and internal quotation marks omitted); see In re IndyMac Mortgage-Backed Securities, Civil Action No. 09-4583, 718 F.Supp.2d 495, 508 , 2010 WL 2473243, at *8 (S.D.N.Y.

Horn v. Huddle

636 F. Supp. 2d 10 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 16, 2009

United States v. Reynolds, 345 U.S. 1, 10 , 73 S.Ct. 528 , 97 L.Ed. 727 (1953). In other cases, however, the Court may need to examine the underlying information. Ellsberg v. Mitchell, 709 F.2d 51, 58-59 (D.C.Cir.1983). … This Court later reinstated defendant Brown because of its later discovery that Brown's identity was not in fact covert as of 2002 but that defendant Brown and the Office of General Counsel of the CIA perpetrated a fraud

Leach v. National Railroad Passenger Corporation

128 F. Supp. 3d 146 · District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 3, 2015

Busby v. Capital One, N.A., 772 F. Supp. 2d 268, 284 (D.D.C. 2011) (citation omitted) (quoting Brown v. Argenbright Sec., Inc., 782 A.2d 752, 760 (D.C. 2001)). … Brown v. Children’s Nat’l. Med. Ctr., 773 F. Supp. 2d 125, 138 (D.D.C. 2011); see also Wade v. Wash. Metro. Area Transit Auth., No. 01-0334, 2005 WL 1513137, at *6 (D.D.C.

Burlington Northern Railroad Company v. Surface Transportation Board and the United States of America, West Texas Utilities Company, Intervenor

75 F.3d 685 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Feb 9, 1996

Aluminum Co. of America v. United States, 790 F.2d 938, 941 (D.C.Cir. 1986); see also FTC v. … Burlington Northern, Inc. v. United States, 555 F.2d 637 (8th Cir.1977). See also Akron, Canton & Youngstown R.R. Co. v.

RICHARD C. BARTEL v. BANK OF AMERICA CORPORATION

District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jan 14, 2016

Bartel also cannot prove through competent evidence that he has the right to enforce the instrument, § 3-309 (b), or that he had that right ―when loss of (…continued) (Darlene) Brown v. … (Carla) Brown v.

Paralyzed Veterans of America, Inc. v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority

894 F.2d 458 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jan 30, 1990

Brown v. Neeb, 644 F.2d 551 , 558 n. 12 (6th Cir.1981). See also Vertex Distributing v. Falcon Foam Plastics, Inc., 689 F.2d 885, 893 (9th Cir.1982) (relying on Brown); WMATA Brief at 26. … If the Act created no ongoing maintenance duties, then it is puzzling why WMATA would have taken them on board in the Decree.

Williams v. United States

District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Feb 10, 2022

Brown’s prior inconsistent statement — concerning the Hickson assault — to the grand jury. See (Latasha) Brown v. … Brown, the nature of that crime, and the potential penalty. Longus v. United States, 52 A.3d 836, 851 (D.C. 2012).

Stuart-James Company, Inc., and Marc N. Geman v. Securities & Exchange Commission

857 F.2d 796 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Sep 20, 1988

See Touche Ross & Co. v. … Nicholson v.

Havens v. Mabus

892 F. Supp. 2d 303 · District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 26, 2012

Browning v. Clinton, 292 F.3d 235, 242 (D.C. Cir. 2002). I. … Some have held that the clock restarts only if the requester presents new evidence to the medical board. See, e.g., Green v. White, 319 F.3d 560, 566–67 (3rd Cir. 2003). While the D.C.

Federal Trade Commission v. Whole Foods Market, Inc.

533 F.3d 869 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jul 29, 2008

Brown Shoe Co. v. United States, 370 U.S. 294, 323 , 82 S.Ct. 1502 , 8 L.Ed.2d 510 (1962). … As the Supreme Court explained in Brown Shoe Co. v.

Pearson v. District of Columbia Rental Housing Commission

District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Mar 3, 2022

E.g., Wagshal v. Selig, 403 A.2d 338, 341 (D.C. 1979). That is not a flat rule, however. See, e.g., Brown v. M St. … Cf., e.g., Allworth v.

RICHARD C. BARTEL v. BANK OF AMERICA CORPORATION

District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Dec 24, 2015

Bartel also cannot prove through competent evidence that he has the right to enforce the instrument, § 3-309 (b), or that he had that right “when loss of (…continued) (Darlene) Brown v. … (Carla) Brown v.

Logiurato v. Action

490 F. Supp. 84 · District Court, District of Columbia · Apr 29, 1980

Defendant Brown is the Director of ACTION. Defendant Payton is Director of the Peace Corps. … During the same period, the Peace Corps received complaints from the Costa Rican family providing room and board to Plaintiff.

Auster v. Ghana Airways Ltd.

514 F.3d 44 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Feb 1, 2008

Their objective evidence for this belief is that Ghana Airways issued their boarding passes for that flight. … Dickerson v. Colgrove, 100 U.S. 578, 580 (1879). Among the requirements for equitable estoppel is false representation. Int’l Org. of Masters v. Brown, 698 F.2d 536, 551 (D.C. Cir. 1983).

Frost v. Catholic University of America

960 F. Supp. 2d 226 · District Court, District of Columbia · Aug 15, 2013

Defendant Vigneron is the archbishop of Detroit and chairman of the Board of Trustees of The Catholic University of America. Am. Compl. ¶ 10. … See Brown v. Texas, 443 U.S. 47, 47 (1979) (citing Davis v. Mississippi, 394 U.S. 721 (1969)).

National Air Carrier Association v. Civil Aeronautics Board, Trans World Airlines, Inc., Pan American World Airways (Pan American), Intervenors

442 F.2d 862 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Mar 9, 1971

McGOWAN, Circuit Judge: On this petition for review of two orders issued by the Civil Aeronautics Board, we resume our consideration of issues foreshadowed in National Air Carrier Association, et al. v. CAB, 141 U.S. … The Board addressed itself to this concern.

Kumar v. District of Columbia Water & Sewer Authority

25 A.3d 9 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jul 7, 2011

Brown v. Nat’l Acad. of Scis., 844 A.2d 1113, 1118 (D.C.2004). … Everson v.

Koretoff v. Schaefer

841 F. Supp. 2d 1 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jan 18, 2012

quantity of those inedible kernels to the Board. … See Bailey v.

District of Columbia, Etc. v. Douglas M. Costle, Administrator, Environmental Protection Agency and Environmental Protection Agency, Etc., Washington Area Bicyclist Assoc., Inc., Metropolitan Washington Coalition for Clean Air, Inc., Breathers for the Reduction of Atmospheric Hazards to the Environment, Intervenors. The County of Prince William, Virginia v. Environmental Protection Agency, State of Maryland v. Douglas M. Costle, Administrator, and Environmental Protection Agency, District of Columbia, a Municipal Corp. And Washington Area Bicyclist Assoc., Intervenors. City of Fairfax, a Municipal Corporation v. Douglas M. Costle, Administrator, and Environmental Protection Agency, City of Alexandria, a Municipal Corporation of Virginia v. Douglas M. Costle, Administrator, and Environmental Protection Agency, Commonwealth of Virginia Ex Rel. The State Air Pollution Control Board v. Douglas M. Costle, Administrator, and Environmental Protection Agency

567 F.2d 1091 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Nov 10, 1977

COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA ex rel. the STATE AIR POLLUTION CONTROL BOARD, Petitioner, v. Douglas M. COSTLE, Administrator, and Environmental Protection Agency, Respondents. Nos. 74-1013, 74-1575 and 74-1579 to 74-1582. … . § 294 (d) 1 Brown v. EPA, 521 F.2d 827 (9th Cir. 1975); Arizona v. EPA, 521 F.2d 825 (9th Cir. 1975); Maryland v.