Case law

Brown v. State

162 Tex. Crim. 85 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · May 25, 1955

Tarwater v. State, 160 Texas Cr. Rep. 59 , 265 S.W. 2d 83 ; Stephens v. State, 161 Texas Cr. Rep. 70 , 274 S.W. 2d 829 . … Braun v. State, 158 Texas Cr. Rep. 394 , 257 S.W. 2d 708 . Such notice of appeal does not appear to have been withdrawn.

Brown v. State

34 Neb. 448 · Nebraska Supreme Court · Apr 7, 1892

It was held in Stevens v. State, 19 Neb., 647 , that on an indictment for robbery the accused could be convicted of grand larceny on the ground that the robbery is the greater crime and includes the larceny. … It is declared to be, and is, larceny, and there is no reason why the rule announced in Stevens v. State is not applicable to this case.

Brown v. State

28 Ga. 439 · Supreme Court of Georgia · Jun 15, 1859

Acosta v. Brown

213 Cal. App. 4th 234 · California Court of Appeal · Jan 30, 2013

(Wallace v. Board of Education (1944) 63 Cal.App.2d 611, 617 [ 147 P.2d 8 ], citation omitted; see Bruce v. Gregory (1967) 65 Cal.2d 666, 671 [ 56 Cal.Rptr. 265 , 423 P.2d 193 ]; Dowell v. … Union, Local 1000 v. Brown (2011) 197 Cal.App.4th 252 [ 128 Cal.Rptr.3d 711 ].)

J.H. v. Brown

331 S.W.3d 692 · Missouri Court of Appeals · Feb 8, 2011

Murphy v. Carron, 536 S.W.2d 30, 32 (Mo. banc 1976). … Tessler v.

State v. Brown

306 Or. 599 · Oregon Supreme Court · Sep 29, 1988

State v. Brown, 90 Or App 445 , 752 P2d 1316 (1988). … See, e.g., Wagner v.

State v. Brown

330 So. 2d 535 · District Court of Appeal of Florida · Apr 22, 1976

330 So.2d 535 (1976) STATE of Florida, Appellant, v. Joe Leon BROWN, Appellee. No. BB-305. District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District. April 22, 1976. Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., for appellant. Louis O. … State v. Smith, 260 So.2d 489 (Fla. 1972). The state's right to seek appellate review in a criminal case is purely statutory and is found in Florida Statute 924.07. Whidden v.

People v. Brown

130 Cal. 591 · California Supreme Court · Dec 3, 1900

The defendant testified that the deceased, at the time the fatal shot was fired, was advancing upon him in a threatening manner with an uplifted board in his hand, and that the shooting was necessary to save his own life. … (See, also, Pierson v. People, 79 N. Y. 424 1 ; State v. Larkin, 11 Nev. 328 .)

Brown v. State

84 Fla. 660 · Supreme Court of Florida · Dec 12, 1922

On an indictment for murder in the first degree by shooting, Laura Brown was convicted of manslaughter and took a writ of ex’ror. … Pinder v. State, 27 Fla. 370 , 8 South. Rep. 837 . Reversed for a new trial. Browne, C. J., and Taylor, J., concur. Ellis and West, J. J., dissent.

Mills v. Brown

69 Tex. 244 · Texas Supreme Court · Dec 6, 1887

Brown v. Hill

228 S.C. 34 · Supreme Court of South Carolina · Aug 11, 1955

Peak v. Fripp, 195 S. C. 324, 11 S. E. (2d) 383 . … Drayton v. Industrial Life & Health Ins. Co., 205 S. C. 98, 31 S. E. (2d) 148 ; Thigpen v. Thigpen, 217 S. C. 322, 60 S. E. (2d) 621 .

State v. Brown

28 Or. 147 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 14, 1895

In State v. … In Kumli v.

Brown v. Weissberg

22 A.D.2d 282 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · Dec 17, 1964

Plaintiff’s affidavit of merits is utterly vacuous of evidentiary facts and is therefore hopelessly insufficient (Sortino v. Fisher, 20 A D 2d 25, 31-32). … In this case, unlike the situation in Mulinos v. Coliseum Constr.

Brown v. Pitney

39 Ill. 468 · Illinois Supreme Court · Jan 15, 1866

In Whistler v. … Brown, is construed in the case of Pitney et al. v. Brown, decided at the April Term, 1867, where it is held that those residuary legatees take per •capita and not per stirpes. Decree reversed.

State v. Brown

655 So. 2d 82 · Supreme Court of Florida · May 4, 1995

This Court denied review of Brown's direct appeal in Brown v. State, 576 So.2d 285 (Fla. 1991). On April 2, 1992, we decided Smith v. State, 598 So.2d 1063 (Fla. 1992). … See Pope v.

Brown v. West

75 N.H. 463 · Supreme Court of New Hampshire · Apr 5, 1910

Hill v. Caverly, 7 N. H. 215, 218, 219; Bacheller v. Pinkham, 68 Me. 258 ; Bowden v. Derby, 97 Me. 536 ; Brown v. Lent, 20 Vt. 529, 531 ; Nowell v. Wright, 3 Allen 166 , 170; Breen v. … Brown v. Lent, supra, 533 . The defendants’ exceptions are sustained. Verdict set aside: judgment for the defendants. All concurred.

Brown v. Getchell

11 Mass. 11 · Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · Mar 15, 1814

Thomas v. Brown

67 Md. 512 · Court of Appeals of Maryland · Jun 23, 1887

The transaction was this: The defendants agreed to pay to Brown & Lowndes the amount of the check, upon the agreement on their part to let the defendants have the use of certain bonds.

Harbaugh v. Commonwealth

107 Pa. Commw. 406 · Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · Jul 16, 1987

Joseph’s Hospital v. … Pennsylvania Labor Relations Board v. Stairways, *412 Inc., 56 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 462 , 425 A.2d 1172 (1981).

Brown v. Goolsby

34 Miss. 437 · Mississippi Supreme Court · Oct 15, 1857