Case law

Chism v. City of Tulsa

192 Okla. 366 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 9, 1943

Louis v. Meyrose Lamp Manufacturing Co., supra. … J., GIBSON, V. C. J., and OSBORN, BAYLESS, WELCH, HURST, DAVISON, and ARNOLD, JJ., concur.

Mattox v. Mattox

129 Okla. 301 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 6, 1928

S. 1921; Morris v. Morris, SI Okla. 222, 198 Pac. 70 . … Moorman v. Pettit, 119 Okla. 22 , 248 Pac. 838 ; Griffith v. Scott, 128 Okla. 125 , 261 Pac. 371 .

Opinion No. (1999)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jan 29, 1999

Oklahoma Journal Publishing Company v. Oklahoma City, 620 P.2d 452 , 454 (Okl.Ct.App. 1980). … City of Duncan v. Bingham, 394 P. 2d 456 , 460 (Okla. 1964).

Opinion No. (2003)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Nov 19, 2003

Board. … Arbuckle Abstract Co. v. Scott, 975 P.2d 879 , 886 (Okla. 1998).

Opinion No. (1995)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jan 12, 1995

In that opinion, the Attorney General, while construing the dual office holding provisions of 51 O.S. 6 (1971), cited State v. … See also, Tarabashi v.

State Ex Rel. Dabney v. Ledbetter

162 Okla. 20 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 3, 1933

That the respondent, as an attorney, filed in the District Court of the United 'States for the Eastern District of Oklahoma, in cause No. 3982, entitled “Willis v. … It is only fair to the Honorable Board of Governors who made the report now under consideration to emphasize the fact that the apology above mentioned and the recommendation were not before the Honorable Board of Governors

Powell v. State Industrial Commission

208 Okla. 281 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 31, 1953

The board, referring to the board claimant said struck his feet, had blown around and claimant was standing “kind of” on the board. This board was placed over a depression underneath the press. William W. … Johnson v. Ben Franklin Ref. Co., 194 Okla. 347 , 151 P. 2d 428 ; Banning v. Peru-Laclede Syn., 179 Okla. 382 , 65 P. 2d 976 ; Hollis v. Mid-Continent Pet. Corp., 174 Okla. 544 , 51 P. 2d 498 ; Souder v.

Calkin v. Wolcott

182 Okla. 278 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 7, 1937

In Brown v. … Brown v. Trent, supra; Driskell v. Quinn, supra.

Roselle v. State

509 P.2d 486 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Apr 18, 1973

C-71-524, Appellant, Joe Ro-selle, was convicted for the offense of Contempt in a Summary Proceedings on the 20th day of September, 1971, before District Court Judge Elvin Brown. … In the cases of Re Oliver, 333 U.S. 257 , 68 S.Ct. 499 , 92 L.Ed. 682 (1947) and Mayberry v.

Poley v. Browne

199 Okla. 416 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 18, 1947

Thomas, 130 Ga. 153 , 60 S.E. 461 ; Boyd v. Portland Elec. Co., 41 Ore. 336 , 68 P. 810 ; Charette v. Village L’Anse, 154 Mich. 304 , 117 N.W. 737 ; Denver Consol. Elec. Co. v. … Midland Oil Co. v. Thigpen (1924) 4 F. 2d 85 ; Spellman et al. v. Sherry, 181 Okla. 174 , 72 P. 2d 793 .

Prairie Pipe Line Co. v. Excise Bd. of Pottawatomie

168 Okla. 250 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 15, 1934

This is an appeal by Prairie Pipe Line Company, a corporation, et al. against the excise board of Pottawatomie county from a judgment of the Court of Tax Review. … CULLISON, V. C. J., and SWINDALL, ANDREWS, McNEILL, and BUSBY, JJ., concur. RILEY, C. J., and BAYLESS and WELCH, JJ., absent.

Opinion No. 77-183 (1977) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Sep 9, 1977

In Allen v. … This statement of rule of law was reaffirmed in Lairmore v.

In Re Assessment of St. Louis-San Francisco Ry. Co.

120 Okla. 289 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 7, 1926

This is the full scope of the section and the limit of the power of the State Board of Equalization. Wolverton Hardware Co. v. Porter, Comanche County Treasurer, 61 Okla. 171 , 160 Pac. 906 ; Scott v. … Board of County Commissioners of Muskogee county et al., 100 Okla. 77 , 227 Pac. 448 ; Kramer v. Gypsy Oil Co., 68 Okla. 212 , 173 Pac. 802 . ' The order of the State Board of Equalization appealed from is reversed.

Opinion No. (1999)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jul 19, 1999

Corp. v. Oklahoma Corp. Comm., 829 P.2d 964 , 969 (Okla. 1992). … See Associated Indus. of Oklahoma v.

Leach v. State

94 Okla. Crim. 56 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Apr 18, 1951

In the above case there is cited with approval the case of Brown v. … In the case of Brown v. State, 81 Okla.

Opinion No. (1985)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Aug 8, 1985

McGowan v. Maryland , 366 U.S. 420 , 425-426 , 81 S.Ct. 1101 , 6 L.Ed.2d 393 (1961). To answer your question we must examine the history behind Okla. Const. … Article VI , Section 31a in the case of Board of Regents, Okla. A. M. Col. v. Oklahoma State Regents , 497 P.2d 1062 (Okla. 1972).

Carson v. Oklahoma Dredging Co.

152 Okla. 147 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 30, 1931

Hoefgen v. Harness (1897) 148 Ind. 224 , 47 N. E. 470 ; Keiser v. Mills (1903) 162 Ind. 366 , 69 N. E. 142 ; Thorn v. Silver (1910) 174 Ind. 504, 520 , 89 N. E. 943 , 92 N. E. 161 ; Rayl v. … E. 440 ; Karr v. Board (1908) 170 Ind. 571 , 85 N. E. 1 ; Murrav v. Gault (1913) 179 Ind. 658, 670 , 101 N. E. 632 ; Northern Ind. Land Co. v. Brown, 182 Ind. 438 , 106 N. E. 706 .” In the case of Reasoner v.

Allison v. Massey

108 Okla. 140 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 3, 1925

The said plaintiff in error did the acts necessary to qualify as a member of the board of county commissioners, and he and the defendant in error sat with the other two members of the board at one or more meetings in the … month of July,1923; but the board of county commissioners recognized neither.

Trapp v. Dykes

140 Okla. 63 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 3, 1929

Silberschein v. U. S., 285 Fed. 397 ; Crawford v. Cassity, 78 Okla. 261 , 190 Pac. 412 ; Tripp v Board of Education (Kan.) 227 Pac. 345 ; Dixon County v. Field, 111 U. S. 83 , 28 L. Ed. 360 . … The Supreme Court of the United States, in the ease of Cherokee Nation v. Hitchcock, 187 U.

Harper v. Kelly

29 Okla. 809 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 14, 1911

M., in the Chickasaw Nation known as the Brown pasture. … (Harding v. Gillette et al., 25 Okla. 199 , 107 Pac. 665 ; Oklahoma City Electric, Gas & Power Co. et al. v. Baumhoff, 21 Okla. 503 , 96 Pac. 758 ; Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v.