Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

FiltersOR

10,000+ results

1.87s

  • Kienow's Food Stores, Inc. v. Lyster

    79 Or. App. 416 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · May 21, 1986

    See Gallea v. Willamette Industries, 56 Or App 763 , 643 P2d 390 (1982). … The conclusions of the referee and the Board are amply supported by the record.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Myrtle Point Mill & Lumber Co. v. Clarke

    102 Or. 533 · Oregon Supreme Court · Jan 10, 1922

    In Oliver v. … Co. v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Raifsnider v. Caveman Industries, Inc.

    55 Or. App. 780 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Feb 2, 1982

    Higgins v. Med. Research Foundation, 48 Or App 29, 32 , 615 P2d 1192 (1980); see Inkley v. Forest Fiber Products Co., 288 Or 337, 348 , 605 P2d 1175 (1980); Satterfield v. … Similarly, the Board made no specific finding of prejudice. Employer argues that it was prejudiced, relying on Vandre v. Weyerhaeuser Co., 42 Or App 705 , 601 P2d 1265 (1979).

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Erickson v. Grande Ronde Lumber Co.

    162 Or. 556 · Oregon Supreme Court · Sep 26, 1939

    In support of these contentions, the respondents cite: Wood v. *584 Moriarty, 15 R. I. 518, 9 Atl. 427 ; Bohanan v. Pope, 42 Me. 93 ; Verrill v. Weinstein, 135 Me. 126 , 190 Atl. 634 ; 13 C. … Strong v. Kamm & Brown, 13 Or. 172 , 9 Pac. 331 (1886); Feldman v. McGuire, 34 Or. 309 , 55 Pac. 872 (1899); Miles v. Bowers, 49 Or. 429 , 90 Pac. 905 (1907); The Home v. Selling, 91 Or. 428 , 179 Pac. 261 (1919).”

    Cited 34 timesPublished
  • Stewart v. City of Salem

    240 Or. App. 466 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jan 26, 2011

    The board reversed the city's decision and ordered it to approve petitioner's partition application. We affirmed the board's determination on review, Stewart v. … See Parquit Corp. v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Johnson v. Eugene Emergency Physicians, P.C.

    159 Or. App. 167 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Mar 17, 1999

    See Lambert v. … We address the issues as the parties frame them. 3 In Pamplin v.

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Rash v. McKinstry Co.

    160 Or. App. 131 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Apr 28, 1999

    Claimant seeks review of a Workers’ Compensation Board (Board) order ruling that insurer’s hen rights, pursuant to ORS 656.580 and ORS 656.593, on claimant’s third-party settlement proceeds were not resolved by the parties … The last antecedent is ‘the last word, phrase, or clause that can be made an antecedent without impairing the meaning of the sentence.’ ” State v. Webb, 324 Or 380, 386 , 927 P2d 79 (1996) (quoting Norman J.

    Reversed on other grounds by Rash v. McKinstry Co., 331 Or. 665 (2001)Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Mar Pacifico, Inc. v. Department of Fish & Wildlife

    148 Or. App. 310 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jun 11, 1997

    Mar Pacifico is the owner of the vessel F/V El Camino, which is the subject of this permit proceeding. … to use the F/V El Camino to fish for Dungeness crab in Oregon coastal waters pursuant to ORS 508.921 to ORS 508.941.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • State v. Randolph

    17 L.R.A. 470 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 17, 1892

    In State v. State Med. Ex. Board, 32 Minn. 324 ( 20 N. W. Rep. 238 ; 50 Am. … See also State v. State Med. Ex. Board, 32 Minn. 325 ( 20 N. W. Rep. 238 ; 50 Am. Rep. 575 ); State ex rel. v. Green, 112 Ind. 462 (14 N. E. Rep. 352); State v. Dent, 25 W.

    Cited 22 timesPublished
  • Mischel v. Portland General Electric Co.

    89 Or. App. 140 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Dec 30, 1987

    The Board did not assess a penalty, because it determined that there were no amounts then due, but it awarded claimant attorney fees for employer’s late denial, citing Spivey v. SAIF, 79 Or App 568 , 720 P2d 755 (1986). … See Fink v. Metropolitan Public Defender, 67 Or App 79 , 676 P2d 934 , rev den 296 Or 829 (1984).

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Penland v. Redwood Sanitary Sewer Service District

    146 Or. App. 225 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Feb 5, 1997

    See Hale v. … Lowrimore v. Dimmitt, [ 310 Or 291, 296 , 797 P2d 1027 (1990)].” In McBride v.

    Reversed on other grounds by Penland v. Redwood Sanitary Sewer Service District, 327 Or. 1 (1998)Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Mosley v. Sacred Heart Hospital

    113 Or. App. 234 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · May 27, 1992

    SAIF denied the claim and moved to join Liberty Northwest Insurance Corporation (Liberty), Sacred Heart’s subsequent insurer in 1990, based on Runft v. SAIF, 303 Or 493 , 739 P2d 12 (1987). Liberty issued a denial. … Claimant sought Board review but served notice only on Sacred Heart. No timely notice was sent to OML or its insurer. Relying on Zurich Ins. Co. v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Keene v. Creswell School District No. 40

    56 Or. App. 801 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Apr 12, 1982

    As we pointed out in Ross v. Springfield School Dist. No. 19, supra: “* * * ORS 342.895 vests in the district school board the authority to dismiss a permanent teacher on the grounds set forth in ORS 342.865. … As pointed out in the body of the opinion, and in Ross v. Springfield School Dist.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Grudle v. State Accident Insurance Fund

    4 Or. App. 326 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jan 7, 1971

    See Graham v. State Ind. Acc. Com., 164 Or 626 , 102 P2d 927 (1940). … In Graham v. State Ind. Acc. Com., supra, the Oregon Supreme Court cited with approval the following language from Greseck v.

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • Harding v. Bell

    265 Or. 202 · Oregon Supreme Court · Apr 2, 1973

    For example, Lally v. Kuster, supra, was a malpractice action charging an attorney with negligence in failing to diligently prosecute the client’s foreclosure suit against a mortgage debtor, Mrs. Brown. … Brown] could have secured would have been one based upon the truth of her testimony and all the inferences properly deducible from that testimony.

    Cited 56 timesPublished
  • Garoutte v. Mail Well Corp.

    200 Or. App. 507 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Jul 6, 2005

    Bennett v. Liberty Northwest Ins. Corp., 128 Or App 71 , 875 P2d 1176 (1994). … ORS 174.010; PGE v. Bureau of Labor and Industries, 317 Or 606, 611 , 859 P2d 1143 (1993). See SAIF v. Henwood, 176 Or App 431 , 31 P3d 1096 (2001). Claimant met his burden.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Bohrer v. Weyerhaeuser Co.

    93 Or. App. 751 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Nov 9, 1988

    In Teel v. … On de novo review, the Board may make such disposition of the case as it determines to be appropriate. Neely v. SAIF, 43 Or App 319 , 602 P2d 1101 (1979), rev den 288 Or 493 (1980). This is in contrast to Travis v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Murphy Citizens Advisory Committee v. Josephine County

    123 Or. App. 539 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Oct 6, 1993

    In Edney v. … See also Bigej Enterprises v. Tillamook County, 118 Or App 342 , 847 P2d 869 , rev den 317 Or 162 (1993); Simon v. Board of Co. Comm. of Marion Co., 91 Or App 487 , 755 P2d 741 (1988).

    Cited 4 timesPublished
  • Reynolds Metals v. Thrasher

    133 Or. App. 30 · Court of Appeals of Oregon · Feb 15, 1995

    Drews v. EBI Companies, supra, 310 Or at 149 ; Hammon Stage Line v. Stinson, 123 Or App 418, 422 , 859 P2d 1180 (1993).” Messmer v. … The Board’s order declining to award compensation for chondromalacia is on review to this court. See Thrasher v. Reynolds Metals, 133 Or App 13 , 889 P2d 1351 (1995).

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Morris v. Parks

    145 Or. 481 · Oregon Supreme Court · Dec 13, 1933

    Plaintiff thereupon tendered his continued services under the agreement and notified the board of his readiness and willingness to perform his engagements under said agreement and apprized the board that it was his intention … Burnap v. United States, 252 U. S. 512 ( 40 S. Ct. 374, 376 , 64 L. Ed. 692 ); Gracey v. City of St. Louis, 213 Mo. 384 ( 111 S. W. 1159 ); United States v. Butler, 49 Fed. (2d) 52, 54.

    Cited 14 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.