Case law

HARWOOD v. ARDAGH GROUP

435 P.3d 121 · Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · Jul 20, 2018

Oklahoma State University , 2016 OK 78 , 378 P.3d 562 and Brown v. … Blair Discussed 2017 OK 13 , 391 P.3d 111 , BROWN v. CLAIMS MANAGEMENT RESOURCES INC. Discussed at Length 2018 OK 40 , 419 P.3d 231 , PINA v. AMERICAN PIPING INSPECTION Cited 1983 OK 67 , 673 P.2d 149 , Fudge v.

Opinion No. (1979)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Oct 5, 1979

United States v. Mississippi Valley Generating Co., 364 U.S. 520 , 81 S.Ct. 294 (1961), 5 L.Ed. 268 ; Youngblood v. Consolidated School District No. 3, Payne County, 104 Okla. 235 , 230 P. 910 (1924); Stigall v. … by a board member's employer where the board member has a direct or indirect interest in the contract.

Humphries v. Lewis

67 P.3d 333 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 12, 2003

Brown, 1999 OK 79 , " 22 n. 30, 989 P.2d 448 , 456 n. 30. The third issue is a question of fact which we review for abuse of discretion. … Tulsa County Deputy Sheriff's FOP v. Board of County Commissioners of Tulsa County, 1988 OK 44, 113 , 959 P.2d 979, 981 . Here, the two statutes are not in conflict-they are harmonious.

Johnson v. KFOR-TV

71 O.B.A.J. 1643 · Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · Dec 28, 1999

Price v. Walters, 1996 OK 63, ¶ 5 , 918 P.2d 1370, 1375 . §%3 Dr. Johnson does not dispute the fact that KFOR's story was based on a disciplinary proceeding before the State Board of Dentistry. … Johnson initially asserted that some of the information in the public record was incorrect, he has never alleged that the broadcast was an inaccurate version of the Board's proceedings. 14 This case is similar to McCain v

Mantooth v. Colbert

178 Okla. 395 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 15, 1936

Davis v. Board of County Commissioners of Lincoln County, 45 Okla. 284 , 137 P. 114 . … S. 1931; Davis v. Board of Commissioners, supra: Norman v. Allen, 47 Okla. 74 , 147 P. 1002 : Arnold v. City of Tulsa, 38 Okla. 129 , 132 P. 660 .

Opinion No. 68-135 (1968) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jul 11, 1968

Herrin v. Arnold, 183 Okl. 392 , 82 P.2d 979 ;School District No. 24, et al. v. Hodge, 199 Okl. 81 , 133 P.2d 575 ; Hatfield v. Jimerson, Co. Supt., Okl., 365 P.2d 980 . … of the rules and regulations of the State Board of Education.

Myers v. State

137 Okla. 272 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 4, 1929

In Adair v. State, 15 Okla. … Section 2407, Id., was under consideration by this court in McCasland v. Board of County Commissioners, 126 Okla. 103, 258 .

Opinion No. (1985)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jun 10, 1985

Marley v. Cannon , 618 P.2d 401 (Okla. 1980). We next examine the Administrative Procedures Act, supra, to ascertain if it grants the Board such authority. … Co. v.

In Re Lane

176 Okla. 60 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 12, 1935

Upon this finding of fact the Board of Governors made the following conclusion of law: “The Board of Governors concludes that the respondent, C. T. … State v. Ledbetter, 127 Okla. 85 , 260 P. 454 ; 2 R. C. L. 1088, and cases cited; 6 C. J. 581. The findings and recommendations of the Board of Governors are therefore approved and the respondent is hereby disbarred.

Seldon Construction Co. v. Dowell

187 Okla. 312 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 30, 1940

Stephenson - Browne Lumber Company intervened and asked judgment for $1,092.65 and attorney’s fees and costs, and Ellison Plumbing & Heating Company also intervened, asking judgment in the sum of $515 and attorney’s fees … Wetzel v. Rixse, 93 Okla. 216 , 220 P. 607 ; Sand Springs R. Co. v. Smith, 84 Okla. 211 , 203 P. 207 ; Garrison Coal Co. v. Semple, 82 Okla. 60 , 198 P. 497 . The judgment is affirmed. BAYLESS, C.

Lane v. Town of Dover, Okl.

761 F. Supp. 768 · District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Mar 26, 1991

Board of Educ. v. Pico, 457 U.S. 853, 864 , 102 S.Ct. 2799, 2806 , 73 L.Ed.2d 435 (1982); United States v. Diebold, Inc., 369 U.S. 654 , 82 S.Ct. 993 , 8 L.Ed.2d 176 (1962). … Board of Regents v. Roth, 408 U.S. 564, 573 , 92 S.Ct. 2701, 2707 , 33 L.Ed.2d 548 (1972).

Bocox v. Town of Bixby

114 Okla. 269 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 20, 1926

In Pitser v. … Co. v.

Nowata Oil Syndicate v. Commercial Nat. Bank

93 Okla. 6 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Oct 16, 1923

Wheeler v. McGuire, 86 Ala. 398 , 2 L. R. A. 808; United States v. Boyd, 5 How. 50 , 12 L. Ed. 36 ; *10 Pullman Co. v. … Meyers. 195 Ala. 397 , 70 South. 763 ; Mechem on Agency (2nd Ed.) rol. 1, secs. 255 and 298; The Texas Co. v. Quelquejeu, 263 Fed. 491 ; Mechem on Agency (2nd Ed.) rol. 1, sec. 743; Sloan v. Brown, 228 Pa. 495 , 139 Am.

Keating v. Edmondson

72 O.B.A.J. 3672 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 4, 2001

Macy v. Board of County Comm'rs, 1999 OK 53, ¶ 12 , 986 P.2d 1130 ; Kratz v. Kratz, 1995 OK 63 , ¶ 11, 905 P.2d 753 . 34 . Independent School Dist. No. JI-69 v. Independent School Dist. No. … The people have also had opportunities to allow appointment to boards and commissions by persons other than the Governor.

Miles v. State

602 P.2d 227 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Oct 29, 1979

In Robinson, we cited Goff v. … Brown came back and informed me of the correct spelling of ‘leniency’.

Carson v. Oklahoma Dredging Co.

152 Okla. 147 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 30, 1931

Hoefgen v. Harness (1897) 148 Ind. 224 , 47 N. E. 470 ; Keiser v. Mills (1903) 162 Ind. 366 , 69 N. E. 142 ; Thorn v. Silver (1910) 174 Ind. 504, 520 , 89 N. E. 943 , 92 N. E. 161 ; Rayl v. … E. 440 ; Karr v. Board (1908) 170 Ind. 571 , 85 N. E. 1 ; Murrav v. Gault (1913) 179 Ind. 658, 670 , 101 N. E. 632 ; Northern Ind. Land Co. v. Brown, 182 Ind. 438 , 106 N. E. 706 .” In the case of Reasoner v.

Opinion No. 72-136 (1972) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jun 12, 1972

Taylor v. State, Okl. Cr., 377 P.2d 508 (1962). … See also Sterling Drug, Inc. v. FTC, 450 F.2d 698 (D.C. Cir. 1971); State v. Worten, 167 Okl. 187 , 29 P.2d 1 (1933);Stone v. Hodges, Okl., 435 P.2d 165 (1967); Shirnnel v.

Woolsey v. Nelson

43 Okla. 97 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 9, 1914

Evinger v. Duke, ante, 130 Pac. 147 On April 10, 1913, the county superintendent, after due notice, heard the petition to change the boundaries of said district and granted the relief requested. … of county commissioners to the district court of the county, by filing with che county clerk, within ten days from the action of the board of county commissioners, a notice of appeal.

Opinion No. 73-190 (1973) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jul 31, 1973

An Oklahoma case Youngblood v. … A California case, Miller v. City of Martinez, 82 P.2d 519 (1938) states the strong policy reasoning behind disallowing any public servant's personal interest in a contract made by him in his official capacity.

Cimmarron Transportation, L.L.C. v. Butler

151 P.3d 920 · Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · Sep 12, 2006

However, the Board fixed the fair cash value of the pipeline at $438,204.62. ¶ 4 Cimmarron next appealed the valuation of the Board of Equalization to District Court and received a trial de novo. … Bliss Hotel Co. v. Thompson, 1962 OK 234, ¶ 19 , 378 P.2d 319, 322 .