Case law

BYTHER EX REL. BYTHER v. City of Mobile

398 F. Supp. 2d 1222 · District Court, S.D. Alabama · Nov 9, 2005

See Tennessee v. … For instance in Smith v.

Ex Parte Jefferson County

767 So. 2d 343 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Mar 17, 2000

."); Armstrong v. … HOOPER, C.J., and MADDOX, HOUSTON, COOK, SEE, LYONS, BROWN, and ENGLAND, JJ., concur. JOHNSTONE, J., concurs specially. JOHNSTONE, Justice (concurring specially).

Davis v. State

3 Ala. App. 71 · Alabama Court of Appeals · Jan 11, 1912

—State v. Murphy, 6 Ala. 845 . The specific pecuniary value is not the main element or the ingredient of the offense .—Newsome v. State, 107 Ala. 133 , 18 South. 206 ; Jackson v. State, 69 Ala. 249 . … —Mar tin v. State, 125 Ala. 64, 71 , 28 South. 92 ; Bates v. State, 152 Ala. 77 , 44 South. 695 . The rulings on the evidence are free from error prejudicial to the defendant, and the case will be affirmed. Affirmed.

Hanvey v. State

369 So. 2d 52 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · Jan 30, 1979

Adair v. State, 53 Ala.App. 251 , 298 So.2d 671 (1974). … Thomas v. State, Ala.Cr.App., 358 So.2d 1076 (1978); Brown v. State, Ala.Cr.App., 339 So.2d 125 (1976). Defendant had no standing to invoke the Fourth Amendment as to the search and seizure in the outhouse.

Treadwell v. Dow-United Technologies

970 F. Supp. 962 · District Court, M.D. Alabama · Mar 12, 1997

See Polston v. Boomershine Pontiac-GMC Truck, Inc., 952 F.2d 1304, 1309 (11th Cir.1992). In his affidavit, Brown describes his credentials as well as plaintiffs course of treatment. … But see Robinson v.

Southall v. Copa Club, Inc.

275 Ala. 699 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Jun 27, 1963

Appellees obtained an order enjoining the Alabama Alcoholic Beverage Control Board, and others, from revoking a liquor license which had been issued to the corporate appellee. … On authority of Southall v. Stricos Corporation, ante p. 156, 153 So.2d 234 , this point is well taken, and the court erred in denying the motion to dissolve. Reversed and Remanded. LIVINGSTON, C.

Young

District Court, N.D. Alabama · Dec 29, 2025

See Winkleblack v. … See Sokol v.

Town of Cedar Bluff v. Citizens Caring for Children

904 So. 2d 1253 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Dec 30, 2004

In Alabama Alcoholic Beverage Control Board v. Henri-Duval Winery, LLC, 890 So.2d 70, 74 (Ala.2003), a party challenged the constitutionality of Alabama's Native Farm Winery Act, § 28-6-1 et seq., Ala.Code 1975. … See Alabama Citizens Action Program v.

Andrews' Heirs v. Brown's Adm'r

21 Ala. 437 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Jun 15, 1852

(Perkins’ ed.) 183 to 145; Ala. 446; Pierce v. Trigg, Leigh 406; Delmonico v. Guellaume et al. 2 Sand. Ch. 366 ; Dyer v. Clarke, 5 Metc. 562 ; 7 Vesey, 425, Hare, 369. … to the control and disposition of the surviving partner, Brown, notwithstanding they stand on the books of the Bank and the Insurance Company in the name of E.

Ex Parte Murphy

886 So. 2d 90 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Dec 30, 2003

Ex parte Board of Zoning Adjustment of the City of Mobile , 636 So.2d 415 (Ala. 1994). . . . [T]he proper interpretation [of terms in the parties' divorce agreement] is a question of law. … HOUSTON, SEE, BROWN, and WOODALL, JJ., concur. HARWOOD, J., concurs in the rationale in part and concurs in the result.

State Oil and Gas Bd. of Alabama v. Anderson

510 So. 2d 250 · Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · Feb 18, 1987

Hughes v. Jefferson County Board of Education , 370 So.2d 1034 (Ala.Civ.App. 1979). … We note that in the case of Dawson v.

Puckett v. State

680 So. 2d 980 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · Mar 8, 1996

the right to confront and cross-examine adverse witnesses (unless the hearing officer specifically finds good cause for not allowing confrontation); (e) a 'neutral and detached' hearing body such as a traditional parole board … Ex parte Brown , 540 So.2d 740 (Ala. 1989) (trial court's failure to comply with A.R.Juv.P. 24 waived by failure to object)." 600 So.2d at 1081 (footnote omitted).

Schneider National Carriers, Inc. v. Tinney

776 So. 2d 753 · Supreme Court of Alabama · May 26, 2000

In Foster v. … Black's Law Dictionary 460 (7th ed. 1999). 3 The Court of Civil Appeals held in Brown v.

United States v. Two Parcels of Real Property Located in Russell County

868 F. Supp. 306 · District Court, M.D. Alabama · Aug 17, 1994

United States v. … United States v. A Single Family Residence, 803 F.2d 625 , 629 n. 4 (11th Cir.1986); see Baxter v.

Harper v. Griffin Lumber Co.

250 Ala. 339 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Feb 5, 1948

Perry Supply Co. v. Brown, 221 Ala. 290 , 128 So. 227 ; Jewel Tea Co. v. Sklivis, 231 Ala. 590 , 165 So. 824 . … McGhee v. Birmingham News Co., 206 Ala. 487 , 90 So. 492 ; Perry Supply Co. v. Brown, 221 Ala. 290 , 128 So. 227 .

Ballards v. State

767 So. 2d 1123 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · Mar 26, 1999

Brown v. State, 374 So.2d 391 (Ala.Cr.App.), aff'd, 374 So.2d 395 (Ala. 1979). However, although the prosecutor argued facts not in evidence, not every such argument is so prejudicial as to require a reversal. … See Brown v. State, at 396.

Craig Const. Co., Inc. v. Hendrix

568 So. 2d 752 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Aug 31, 1990

Copeland v. Richardson , 551 So.2d 353 (Ala. 1989); Cale v. City of Bessemer , 393 So.2d 959 (Ala. 1980). … In Brown Mechanical Contractors, Inc. v.

Leonard v. Rumsfeld

146 F. Supp. 2d 1227 · District Court, M.D. Alabama · Jun 6, 2001

In Brown v. … See also Canino v. EEOC, 707 F.2d 468 , 472 (11th Cir.1983) (Brown holding extends to claims of retaliation) (citing Porter v. Adams, 639 F.2d 273, 278 (5th Cir.1981)); Newbold v.

Olsson v. Nelson

248 Ala. 441 · Supreme Court of Alabama · Dec 5, 1946

Brown. Neither the will of Louis M. … Pollard v. Maddox, 28 Ala. 321 .

Webb v. State

539 So. 2d 343 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · Dec 30, 1988

Gen., and Jean Williams Brown, Asst. Atty. Gen., for appellee. Alabama Supreme Court 86-1208. BOWEN, Presiding Judge. … But see Brown v. Commonwealth, 551 S.W.2d 557 (Ky.1977) (defendant's testimony admitting prior conviction on cross-examination at guilt trial not shielded by Fifth Amendment from use at sentencing).