Case law

Brown v. Haley

233 Va. 210 · Supreme Court of Virginia · Apr 24, 1987

Citing Bates v. … Jones v.

Briggs v. Brown

55 Fla. 417 · Supreme Court of Florida · Jan 15, 1908

Wherefore, according to the books so kept by the said MJerton V. Brown, the said Merton V. … Brown, without any intent-to injure the said Merton V.

Brown v. Dempsey

95 Pa. 243 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Oct 4, 1880

Mathias v. … It has been held in Jamison v. Collins, 2 Norris 359, which was followed by Lee v.

Wilson v. Brown

269 Pa. 225 · Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · Dec 31, 1920

Railroad, 195 Pa. 91 ; Glenn v. Kittanning Brewing Co., 259 Pa. 510 ; Passmore v. Allentown & Reading Traction Co., 267 Pa. 356 ; Kelly v. Thomas, 234 Pa. 419 . … It is admitted that if this complainant went before the board of directors, they would refuse to act.

Brown v. State

59 Wash. 195 · Washington Supreme Court · Jun 27, 1910

State v. Brown, *196 37 Wash. 106 , 79 Pac. 638 , 117 Am. St. 798, 68 L. R. A. 889. … Smith v. Board of Dental Examiners, 31 Wash. 492 , 72 Pac. 110 ; In re Thompson, 36 Wash. 377 , 78 Pac. 899 ; State v. Brown, supra; State v. Sexton, 37 Wash. 110 , 79 Pac. 634 ; State v.

Brown v. Morris

365 Mo. 946 · Supreme Court of Missouri · May 14, 1956

Moore v. Brown, 350 Mo. 256 , 165 S.W.2d 657, 663 ; State v. Burns, 351 Mo. 163 , 172 S.W.2d 259, 265 ; § § 31, 52(b), Art. III, 1945 Constitution of Missouri. … State on inf. of Dalton v. Metropolitan St. Louis Sewer Dist., 365 Mo. 1 , 275 S. W. 2d 225, 234 [23]; Hickey v. Board of Education of City of St. Louis, 363 Mo. 1039 , 256 S.W.2d 775, 778 [11].

State v. Brown

28 Or. 147 · Oregon Supreme Court · Oct 14, 1895

In State v. … In Kumli v.

Beach v. Brown

43 L.R.A. 114 · Washington Supreme Court · Nov 29, 1898

However, the case of Williams v. … See, also, Bennett v. Bennett, 116 N. Y. 584 ( 23 N. E. 17 ); Van Arnam v. Ayers, 67 Barb. 544 ; Haynes v. Nowlin, 129 Ind. 581 ( 29 N. E. 389 , 28 Am. St. Rep. 213 ); Lynch v. Knight, 9 H. L. Cas. 577; Westlake v.

Brown v. Anderson

90 Ind. 93 · Indiana Supreme Court · May 15, 1883

Brownfield v. Weicht, 9 Ind. 394 ; Ragan v. Haynes, 10 Ind. 348 ; Godfrey v. Godfrey, 17 Ind. 6 ; Houk v. Barthold, 73 Ind. 21 ; Wilcox v. Moudy, 82 Ind.219. … Eggleston v. Castle, 42 Ind. 531 ; Kirkland v. State, 43 Ind. 146 (13 Am. R. 386); Brooks v. Allen, 62 Ind. 401 .

Brown v. West

75 N.H. 463 · Supreme Court of New Hampshire · Apr 5, 1910

Hill v. Caverly, 7 N. H. 215, 218, 219; Bacheller v. Pinkham, 68 Me. 258 ; Bowden v. Derby, 97 Me. 536 ; Brown v. Lent, 20 Vt. 529, 531 ; Nowell v. Wright, 3 Allen 166 , 170; Breen v. … Brown v. Lent, supra, 533 . The defendants’ exceptions are sustained. Verdict set aside: judgment for the defendants. All concurred.

State v. Brown

68 Wash. App. 480 · Court of Appeals of Washington · Jan 19, 1993

State v. Grover, 55 Wn. … In State v. Lane, 56 Wn.

Brown v. Getchell

11 Mass. 11 · Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · Mar 15, 1814

Brown v. Pointer

390 Mich. 346 · Michigan Supreme Court · Nov 20, 1973

People v Hallaway, 389 Mich 265, 276 ; 205 NW2d 451 (1973); Dundas v Lansing, 75 Mich 499, 502 ; 42 NW 1011 ; 13 Am St Rep 457; 5 LRA 143 (1889); Brown v People, 17 Mich 429, 435 ; 97 Am Dec 195 (1868). … Yong Hong Keung v Dulles, 127 F Supp 252 (D Mass, 1954).

Brown v. Woodbury

5 Ind. 254 · Indiana Supreme Court · Jun 12, 1854

Brown’s answer is sworn to. … Brown set up in avoidance as to part certain matters of payment.'

Coffin v. Brown

55 L.R.A. 732 · Court of Appeals of Maryland · Dec 5, 1901

As was said in Lewis v. … In Fresh v.

Brown v. Popolizio

166 A.D.2d 44 · Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · May 7, 1991

(Matter of Hines v New York City Hous. Auth., supra, at 1001; and see, Matter of Knox v Christian, 96 AD2d 490 ; Matter of Edwards v Christian, 61 AD2d 1045 , affd 46 NY2d 964 .) … The punishment of terminating petitioners’ tenancies under the circumstances presented was " ' "so disproportionate to the offense[s] * * * as to be shocking to one’s sense of fairness” ’ ” (Matter of Pell v Board of Educ

Brown v. Robertson

76 S.C. 151 · Supreme Court of South Carolina · Feb 16, 1907

Brown, the appellant, made application before Judge Klugh for a writ of habeas corpus, alleging in his petition: “1. That he is the captain and commander of the Salvation Army Post at Columbia, S. … In the case of Rex v.

Brown v. Jensen

41 Cal. 2d 193 · California Supreme Court · Jul 3, 1953

Bank v. Chapman, 31 Cal.App.2d 182 [ 87 P.2d 724 ] ; Hellman Com. T. & S. Bank v. Maurice, 105 Cal.App. *196 653 [ 288 P. 683 ] ; Ferry v. Fisk, 54 Cal.App. 763 [ 202 P. 964 ] ; Crescent Lumber Co. v. … Plaintiff relies on Hillen v.

McKean v. Brown

83 Ky. 208 · Court of Appeals of Kentucky · Sep 24, 1885

The appellant, Elizabeth McKean, is seeking to recover dower in a tract of land owned by the appellee, Brown, alleging that on the 25th of September, 1870, she was the wife of the grantor, Hiram McKean, who was the owner … It is urged that the statement in the petition, that .she had been divorced from her husband, should be •construed as meaning that she was divorced from ■bed and board only.

Brown v. Levy

29 Tex. Civ. App. 389 · Court of Appeals of Texas · May 21, 1902

Brown, of Houston, Texas (hereinafter called principal), and the Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland, a corporation created and existing under the laws of the State of Maryland, having its principal office in the city … Brown, [Seal] [Seal] [Seal] [Seal] “Principals. “Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland, “By Norman G. Kittrell, Director. “Attest: ander G. Bobb, General Agent.”