Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

FiltersME

9,550 results

0.34s

  • Thompson v. Dunham

    239 A.2d 649 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Mar 18, 1968

    First Universalist Soc., Bath v. Swett, et al. (1952) 148 Me. 142, 146 , 90 A.2d 812 . … Doherty v. Grady, (1908) 105 Me. 36 , 72 A. 869 .

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Nangle v. Town of Windham

    Superior Court of Maine · Feb 23, 2016

    In Murray v. … In Crispin v.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Town of Georgetown v. State of Maine, Bd. of Envtl. Protection

    Superior Court of Maine · Jul 14, 2010

    Board ojEnvirotlmental Protection, 528 A.2d 453, 455­ 56 (Me. 1987); accord, uyer v. … Town of Ogunquit v.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Comeau v. Town of Kitter

    Superior Court of Maine · Apr 23, 2008

    Rowe v. City of S. Portland, 1999 ME 81, CJ[ 5, 730 A.2d 673, 675 (citing Twigg v. Town of Kennebunk, 662 A.2d 914, 916 (Me. 1995)). … Substantial evidence is evidence that is sufficient for a board to have reasonably found the facts as it did. Ryan v. Town of Camden, 582 A.2d 973, 975 (Me. 1990).

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • State v. Cleveland Grover

    96 Me. 363 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Apr 11, 1902

    In this state in State v. … The statement of the rule above quoted from State v. Grant, Avas approved in Commonwealth v. Morey, 1 Gray, 461 . In a later case in Maine, State v.

    Cited 21 timesPublished
  • Godfrey v. Rice

    59 Me. 308 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 1, 1871

    Wild v. Fisher, 4 Pick. 421 . In Pownal v. … In Hubbly v. Brown, 16 Johns. 71 , Spencer, J., says, “ we have regarded the indorser in the nature of a surety, and the maker of the note as the principal debtor.”

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • State v. Pulsifer

    1999 Me. 24 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Feb 9, 1999

    See State v. Michaud, 611 A.2d 61, 63-64 (Me.1992) (defendant failed to meet his burden of demonstrating that he did not instigate the fight); State v. … See State v. Rollins, 295 A.2d 914, 921 (Me.1972); see also State v.

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • Bellegarde Custom Kitchens v. Leavitt

    295 A.2d 909 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Oct 25, 1972

    Pray v. Millett, 122 Me. 40 , 118 A. 721 (1922); Andrew v. Bishop, supra. … Union National Bank of Wichita, Kan. v. Lamb, 337 U.S. 38 , 69 S.Ct. 911 , 93 L.Ed. 1190 (1949); Romaine v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, 485 P.2d 102 (Nev. 1971); Brown v.

    Cited 17 timesPublished
  • Wilson v. Grand Trunk Railway

    57 Me. 138 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 1, 1869

    The plaintiff was a passerfger on board the defendants’ cars. Her trunk had been lost while traveling over the Portland & Kennebec Railroad. … In Mayall v. Boston & Maine Railroad, 19 N.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Miville v. Maine Employment Security Commission

    219 A.2d 752 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · May 20, 1966

    We adhered to that position in Bilodeau v. … Bigger v. Unemployment Compensation Comm., (1947) 4 Terry 553 , 53 A.2d (Del.) 761, 766. See also Barclay White Co. v. Unemployment Compensation Board of Review, (1947) 356 Pa. 43 , 50 A.2d 336 ; Chambers v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Dunton v. Clauson

    67 F. Supp. 839 · District Court, D. Maine · Sep 27, 1946

    The court sustained the Board of Tax Appeals in holding the distribution conclusively presumed to be a taxable dividend. … Beretta v. Commissioner, 5 Cir., 141 F.2d 452 ; Guild v. Commissioner, 19 B.T.A. 1186 ; Wilcox v. Commissioner, 9 Cir., 137 F.2d 136 .

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Trott v. City Ins. Co.

    24 F. Cas. 215 · U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Maine · Apr 15, 1860

    words, it provides, in effect, that any difference or dispute in relation to any loss sustained, or alleged to be sustained, shall be referred to and be determined by referees, to be chosen mutually by the assured and the board … Tattersall v. Groote, 2 Bos. & P. 131; Mitchell v. Harris, 2 Ves. Jr. 129; Street v. Rigby, 6 Ves. 815; Wellington v. Mackintosh, 2 Atk. 569; Gourlay v. The Duke of Somerset, 19 Ves. 430; Milne v.

    Cited 8 timesPublished
  • State v. Currier

    521 A.2d 295 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Feb 20, 1987

    See Chambers v. … Unlike State v.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • McKenney v. Farnsworth

    121 Me. 450 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Sep 9, 1922

    State v. Robb, 100 Maine, Page 194. … Commonwealth v. Crowninshield, 187 Mass., 225 . Commonwealth v. Sisson, 189 Mass., 247 . Commonwealth v. Staples, 191 Mass., 384 . Portland and Oxford Central R. R. Co. v. Grand Trunk Ry. Co., 46 Maine, 69. Wadleigh v.

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • Bradstreet v. Rich

    74 Me. 303 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jan 27, 1883

    For the contract in full, see Bradstreet v. Rich, 72 Maine, 233. … State v. Benner, 64 Maine, 267. "No exception,” remarks Bell, C. J., in Cutler v. Welsh, 43 N.

    Cited 6 timesPublished
  • Hall v. City of Auburn

    567 F. Supp. 1222 · District Court, D. Maine · Jul 11, 1983

    This achievement alone establishes her as a prevailing party. 1 See, e.g., Boyd v. Ozark Air Lines, 568 F.2d 50 (8th Cir.1977); Brown v. … See Hensley v. Eckerhart, supra, - U.S. at - - -, 103 S.Ct. at 1940—43; Lamphere v. Brown, 610 F.2d 46, 47 (1st Cir.1979); Copeland v. Marshall, 641 F.2d 880 , 892 n. 18 (D.C.Cir.1980) (en banc). Cf. Miles v.

    Cited 5 timesPublished
  • Mabee v. Town of Kennebunkport

    Superior Court of Maine · Sep 21, 2010

    Initially, the court notes that the Planning Board did consider the Mabees' evidence. While the Board could have given the evidence greater weight than it did, see A1uirgen Prop., Inc. v. … Initially, the court notes that the Planning Board did consider the Mabees' evidence. While the Board could have given the evidence greater weight than it did, see Muirgen Prop., Inc. v.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Bartlett v. Stearns

    73 Me. 17 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Sep 8, 1881

    In Stone v. Bartlett, 46 Maine, 438; Smith v. Dow, 51 Maine, 21, and True v. … Bullard v. Hinkley, 6 Maine, 289. If the mortgage debt is paid before the right of redemption is taken, there being no mortgage subsisting, nothingvpasses by the sale. Brown v. Snell, 46 Maine, 490.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Regional School Unit No. 5 v. Coastal Education Assn

    Superior Court of Maine · May 22, 2014

    In Board of Directors of MSAD No. 36 v. … Biddeford Board of Education v.

    Cited 0 timesUnpublished
  • Town of Arundel v. Dubois Livestock, Inc.

    211 A.3d 202 · Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · Jul 9, 2019

    v. DUBOIS LIVESTOCK, INC., et al. … Registration Sys., Inc. v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.