Case law

Flannery v. District of Columbia Department of Health

District Court, District of Columbia · Dec 18, 2023

Browning v. Clinton, 292 F.3d 235, 242 (D.C. Cir. 2002) (Rule 12(b)(6) case); Food & Water Watch, Inc. v. Vilsack , 808 F.3d 905, 913 (D.C. … [of The Big Board’s license] itself is ultra vires, null and void.”

Local Lodge No. 1424, International Association of MacHinists Afl-Cio and International Association of MacHinists Afl-Cio v. National Labor Relations Board, National Labor Relations Board v. Bryan Manufacturing Company

264 F.2d 575 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Feb 27, 1959

Co. v. N.L.R.B., supra; see N.L.R.B. v. Textile Mach. Works, Inc., 3 Cir., 1954, 214 F.2d 929 . The Board is prohibited, however, from making any legal conclusion with regard to events outside the statutory period. … We therefore uphold the Board's order under the authority of N.L.R.B. v. Gaynor News Co., supra, 2 Cir., 1952, 197 F.2d 719 , affirmed sub nom. Radio Officers' Union of Commercial Telegraphers Union, A.F.L. v.

White v. United States

714 A.2d 115 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jun 11, 1998

See also (Bobby) Brown v. … (Pomeroy) Brown v. United States, 58 App.

Gary v. Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority

886 F. Supp. 78 · District Court, District of Columbia · May 11, 1995

Charles Brown. Mr. Edward Long was Mr. Brown’s supervisor and Plaintiffs second-level supervisor. … Supervisor Brown told her that he had heard about the sexual harassment charges and that he did not want her working at Southeast.

Smith v. United States

392 A.2d 990 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Oct 11, 1978

Brookhart v. Janis, 384 U.S. 1, 3 , 86 S.Ct. 1245 , 16 L.Ed. 314 (1966). The trial court here relied on Brown v. … See Brown v. United States, supra; Thomas v. United States, supra. See also Fed.R.Evid. 609(d); United States v. Decker, 543 F.2d 1102, 1104-05 (5th Cir. 1976), cert. denied sub nom. Vice v.

Amalgamated Association Of Street, Electric Railway And Motor Coach Employees Of America v. Herman Adler

340 F.2d 799 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Dec 10, 1964

He was a shop steward and a member of the local union's executive board. … Brown-Pacific-Maxon, 340 U.S. 504, 507 , 71 S.Ct. 470 , 95 L.Ed. 483 (1951) 6 Ibid 7 Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v.

Taylor Wine Co., Inc. v. Department of Treasury

509 F. Supp. 792 · District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 13, 1981

See also Virginia Pharmacy Board v. Virginia Citizens Consumer Council, 425 U.S. 748 , 96 5. Ct. 1817, 48 L.Ed.2d 346 (1976). … See NLRB v. Brown, 380 U.S. 278, 290-292 , 85 S.Ct. 980, 987-988 , 13 L.Ed.2d 839 (1965). Defendants’ reliance on 27 C.F.R. § 4.38 is also in error.

United States v. Taylor

District Court, District of Columbia · Jan 27, 2023

United States v. … Gov’t Brown Opp. at 6–7 (quoting and discussing Dean v. United States, 556 U.S. 568, 570–76 (2009)).

Hurt v. United States

337 A.2d 215 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Apr 29, 1975

Brown was the fourth in a series of witnesses presented by appellant to establish Parker’s reputation for violence. … United States v. Martin, 154 U.S.App.D.C. 359 , 475 F.2d 943 (1973); United States v. McCall, 148 U.S.App.D.C. 444 , 460 F.2d 952 (1972); United States v. Johnson, 140 U.S.

Logiurato v. Action

490 F. Supp. 84 · District Court, District of Columbia · Apr 29, 1980

Defendant Brown is the Director of ACTION. Defendant Payton is Director of the Peace Corps. … During the same period, the Peace Corps received complaints from the Costa Rican family providing room and board to Plaintiff.

Auster v. Ghana Airways Ltd.

514 F.3d 44 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Feb 1, 2008

Their objective evidence for this belief is that Ghana Airways issued their boarding passes for that flight. … Dickerson v. Colgrove, 100 U.S. 578, 580 (1879). Among the requirements for equitable estoppel is false representation. Int’l Org. of Masters v. Brown, 698 F.2d 536, 551 (D.C. Cir. 1983).

Mintz v. Federal Deposit Insurance

729 F. Supp. 2d 276 · District Court, District of Columbia · Aug 6, 2010

See Kowal v. MCI Communications Corp., 16 F.3d at 1276 ; Browning v. Clinton, 292 F.3d 235, 242 (D.C.Cir.2002). . B. Liability of the FDIC Mr. … ]•” Browning v. Clinton, 292 F.3d at 242 (citation and internal quotation marks omitted); see In re IndyMac Mortgage-Backed Securities, Civil Action No. 09-4583, 718 F.Supp.2d 495, 508 , 2010 WL 2473243, at *8 (S.D.N.Y.

Crump v. Browning

110 A.2d 695 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jan 17, 1955

Atchison v. Dullam, 16 Ill.App. 42 . This seems to be the rule generally followed in cases involving firearms and explosives. Skinner v. Ochiltree, 148 Fla. 705 , 5 So.2d 605 , 140 A.L.R. 410 ; McLaughlin v. … Normand v. Normand, La.App., 65 So.2d 914 ; Luttrell v. Carolina Mineral Co., 220 N.C. 782 , 18 S.E.2d 412 ; Skinner v. Ochiltree, supra; Naegele v. Dollen, supra. We think this court should not adopt a softer policy.

Maurice Foley Co., Inc. v. Balderson

569 F.2d 132 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jan 12, 1978

O'Leary v. Brown-Pacific-Maxon, Inc., 340 U.S. 504, 508 , 71 S.Ct. 470, 472 , 95 L.Ed. 483 (1951); Presley v. … V 1975). If the Board departs from that legal standard in reviewing the decision of the ALJ, we must reverse. Atlantic & Gulf Stevedores, Inc. v.

McMillen v. United States

407 A.2d 603 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Oct 4, 1979

United States, D.C.App., 302 A.2d 216 (1973) (no requirement of showing intent to use weapon for a criminal purpose, must prove intent to do the proscribed act); Brown v. … . *605 In Jackson , we did not cite or discuss Brown v. United States, D.C.App., 379 A.2d 708 (1977), a case on all fours with the present case.

Hugh Kaufman v. Thomas Perez

745 F.3d 521 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Mar 14, 2014

Brown v. Brody, 199 F.3d 446, 455 (D.C.Cir.1999) (even when there is a “significant change in duties or responsibilities ... there must still be some kind of injury for a federal employee to state a claim”). … Rich v.

District No. 1, Pacific Coast District, Marine Engineers' Beneficial Association, Afl-Cio v. Liberty Maritime Corporation

70 F. Supp. 3d 327 · District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 30, 2014

v. … DATE: September 30, 2014 Ketanji Brown Jackson KETANJI BROWN JACKSON United States District Judge

Goodall v. United States

759 A.2d 1077 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Sep 28, 2000

See Holland v. … Butler, 838 F.2d 59 , 63 (5th Cir.1987) (holding parole eligibility is a collateral consequence to a guilty plea); Brown v.

Howard Co. v. Baldwin Co.

48 App. D.C. 437 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Mar 3, 1919

Brown Chemical Co. v. Meyer, 139 U. S. 540 , 35 L. ed. 247, 11 Sup. Ct. Rep. 625; Singer Mfg. Co. v. June Mfg. Co. 163 U. S. 169 , 41 L. ed. 118, 16 Sup. Ct. Rep. 1002; Elgin Nat. Watch Co. v. … Brown Chemical Co. v. Meyer, 139 U. S. 540 , 35 L. ed. 247, 11 Sup. Ct. Rep. 625. The same rule applies to a corporation.

Pendergrass v. United States Department of Defense

District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 9, 2020

DATE: September 9, 2020 Ketanji Brown Jackson KETANJI BROWN JACKSON United States District Judge … In Yearwood v.