Case law

Opinions from 1658 to today.

FiltersOK

10,000+ results

3.34s

  • Mathews v. State Ex Rel. Williamson

    186 Okla. 333 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Nov 16, 1939

    In this connection we are cited to the case of Kreiser v. … of the board.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Carson v. Oklahoma Dredging Co.

    152 Okla. 147 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 30, 1931

    Hoefgen v. Harness (1897) 148 Ind. 224 , 47 N. E. 470 ; Keiser v. Mills (1903) 162 Ind. 366 , 69 N. E. 142 ; Thorn v. Silver (1910) 174 Ind. 504, 520 , 89 N. E. 943 , 92 N. E. 161 ; Rayl v. … E. 440 ; Karr v. Board (1908) 170 Ind. 571 , 85 N. E. 1 ; Murrav v. Gault (1913) 179 Ind. 658, 670 , 101 N. E. 632 ; Northern Ind. Land Co. v. Brown, 182 Ind. 438 , 106 N. E. 706 .” In the case of Reasoner v.

    Cited 2 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. 72-136 (1972) Ag

    Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jun 12, 1972

    Taylor v. State, Okl. Cr., 377 P.2d 508 (1962). … See also Sterling Drug, Inc. v. FTC, 450 F.2d 698 (D.C. Cir. 1971); State v. Worten, 167 Okl. 187 , 29 P.2d 1 (1933);Stone v. Hodges, Okl., 435 P.2d 165 (1967); Shirnnel v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Magnolia Petroleum Co. v. Saylor

    72 Okla. 282 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 29, 1919

    Doneghey, 71 Okla. 204 , 177 Pac. 86 , the rule announced in Brown v. Wilson, supra, was in express terms overruled. Justice Miley, delivering- the opinion of the court, said: “In Brown v. … Case [ 53 Okla. 748 , 157 Pac. 710 ] and Brown v.

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • Hiatt v. State

    67 Okla. Crim. 372 · Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · Sep 22, 1939

    hospital for treatment, as the members of such board do not act as judicial officers, but as a special board, clothed with a special power only; and the fact that the county judge is a member of said board does not affect … See, also, Clements v. McGinn, 4 Cal. Unrep. 163 , 33 P. 920 ; People v. Tyree, 21 Cal. App. 701 , 132 P. 784 ; State v. Simes, 12 Idaho, 310 , 85 P. 914 , 9 Ann. Cas. 1216; City of Guthrie v.

    Cited 13 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. (1999)

    Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jul 29, 1999

    See Dobbs v. Board of County Com'rs of Oklahoma County, 257 P.2d 802 , 806 (Okla 1953). … Board of Regents for and on behalf of Murray State College of Agric. And Applied Science v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Hinton v. State Ex Rel. Neal, County Attorney

    57 Okla. 777 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Feb 29, 1916

    Co. v. … In disposing of that case (Board of Co. Com’rs v. Dunlap, 17 Okla. 53 , 87 Pac. 590 ), the court, speaking through Mr.

    Cited 11 timesPublished
  • In Re Gypsy Oil Co.

    141 Okla. 291 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 10, 1929

    In Pitts v. First Nat. Bank of Muskogee, 138 Okla. 284 , 281 Pac. 133 , this court said: “Every municipality must submit its budget to the excise board of their respective counties. City of Sapulpa v. … Schulte v. Board of County Commissioners, 119 Okla. 261 , 250 Pac. 123 . The question then arises as to the effect of the funding- judgments.

    Cited 34 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. (2002)

    Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Apr 15, 2002

    Neer v. Okla. Tax Comm'n, 982 P.2d 1071 , 1078 (Okla. 1999) (citation omitted). … Taylor v. Special Indem. Fund, 804 P.2d 431 , 432 (Okla. 1990) (citation omitted).

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • AL-KHOURI v. OKLAHOMA HEALTH CARE AUTHORITY

    419 P.3d 366 · Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · Sep 29, 2017

    AL-KHOURI v. … The Board also acts on behalf of the Authority, as outlined in § 5007(F). The Authority is an entity and cannot act without the Administrator or Board.

    Cited 1 timesPublished
  • Noble State Bank v. Haskell

    22 Okla. 48 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 11, 1909

    In the case of Matthews v. Board of Corporation Commissioners (C. … Fletcher v. Peck, 6 Cranch, 128 , 3 L. Ed. 162 ; Higgins v. Brown, 20 Okla. 355 , 94 Pac. 703 ; City of Pond Creek et al v. C. N. Haskell et al., 21 Okla. 711 , 97 Pac. 338 . In the case of State v.

    Cited 49 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. (1979)

    Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jul 30, 1979

    Standard National Insurance Company v. State Board of Property and Casualty Rates, 520 P.2d 672 (Okla. 1974). … Oklahoma State AFL-CIO v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. (2003)

    Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Feb 27, 2003

    Journal Publ'g Co. v. City of Oklahoma City, 620 P.2d 452 , 454 (Okla.Ct.App. 1979). … Marley v. Cannon, 618 P.2d 401 , 405 (Okla. 1980). Board approval of expenditures from the fund is necessarily implied from the power granted to the Board to carry out the provisions of the State Act.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. 71-199 (1971) Ag

    Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Mar 11, 1971

    With respect to the first question, we point out that the Board on Legislative Compensation has only such powers as are granted to it by the Oklahoma Constitution in Article V , Section 21 . … See State ex rel Ogden v. Hunt, 286 P.2d 1088 ; and Hines v. Winters, 320 P.2d 1114 . The Attorney General has also considered the relationship of the Board to the Legislature.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. 79-183 (1979) Ag

    Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jun 28, 1979

    In Miller v. … In Stigall v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Rock v. Robinette

    92 Okla. 123 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Sep 18, 1923

    Brown: Objected to as incompetent, irrelevant and immaterial. The Court: Overruled. Mr. Brown: Exception. A. No, sir.” … This court held in Lieberman v.

    Cited 3 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. 74-262 (1974) Ag

    Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Apr 8, 1975

    Burger v. Richards, Okl., 380 P.2d 687 ; Polk v. Oklahoma Alcohol Beverage Control Board, Okl., 420 P.2d 520 . … See Toole v. Michigan State Board of Dentistry, 11 N.W.2d 229 ; and Dixon v. Zick, Colo., 500 P.2d 130 . In the case of Graves v. Minnesota, 272 U.S. 425 , 71 L.Ed. 331 , 47 S.Ct. 122 , citing as authority Dent v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • Opinion No. (1994)

    Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Nov 10, 1994

    Granting permission for municipal annexation of school property falls within the purview of the local boards' power to exercise sole control over the district property. ¶ 6 In fact, in James v. … Carlyle v. Independent School District No. I-71 of McCurtain County, 811 P.2d 618 , 620 (Okla.App. 1991), citing Board of Education of Oklahoma City v.

    Cited 0 timesPublished
  • The Homesteaders v. McCombs, Ins. Com'r.

    24 Okla. 201 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 13, 1909

    Board of County Com'rs, etc., 1 S. D. 370, 47 N. W. 296 ; State v. … Todd et al., 4 Ohio, 351; People v. McClees, 20 Colo. 403 , 38 Pac. 468 , 26 L. R. A. 646; People v. Rogers, 12 Colo. 278 , 20 Pac. 702 ; People v. Board of Trade, 193 Ill. 577 , 62 N.

    Cited 30 timesPublished
  • State Ex Rel. Schulte v. Hallco Environmental, Inc.

    65 O.B.A.J. 4104 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 13, 1994

    Board of Regents of the University of Oklahoma v. National Collegiate Athletic Ass’n, 561 P.2d 499, 501 (Okla.1977). … The parties have cited Bankoff v.

    Cited 8 timesPublished

Ask Donna

Ask Donna

A word about cookies

We need a few to keep you signed in and the library working. The rest help us see which pages people use and where they get stuck. They stay off unless you say yes.