Case law

White v. Union County

93 N.C. App. 148 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Mar 7, 1989

Russ v. Board of Education, 232 N.C. 128, 131 , 59 S.E. 2d 589, 592 (1950). The amendment should have been allowed. … . § 153A-345(e) the requirements for that hearing are set out in Coastal Ready-Mix Concrete Co. v. Board of Commissioners, 299 N.C. 620 , 265 S.E. 2d 379 (1980). See Humble Oil and Refining Co. v.

Wright v. Wal-Mart Stores

North Carolina Industrial Commission · Feb 16, 2007

Brown was never made aware of the incident at work. … *Page 7 Stat. § 97-2 (6); Click v. Pilot Freight Carriers, Inc. , 300 N.C. 164 (1980); Holley v. ACTS, Inc. , 357 N.C. 228 (2003). 2.

Houston v. N.C. Department of Correction

North Carolina Industrial Commission · Aug 14, 2006

Bolkir v. N.C. State University, 321 N.C. 706 , 365 S.E.2d 898 , 900 (1988). 2. … Camalier v. Jeffries, 340 N.C. 699 , 706 , 460 S.E.2d 133 , 136 (1995). 3.

N.C. State Bd. of Educ. v. State

255 N.C. App. 514 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Sep 19, 2017

State v. … Wallace v.

Lambeth v. Southern Power Co.

152 N.C. 371 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Apr 20, 1910

Brown, J. Tbe exceptions to the evidence are, in our opinion, without merit. Tbe defendant could not be permitted to show the' increased value of tbe land a year or more after defendant’s line was constructed. … Dom. (2 Ed.), 478-462; Brown v. Power Co., 140 N. C., 333 ; Abernethy v. R. R., 150 N. C., 97 ; 15 Cyc., 684. No error.

Phelps v. Duke Power Co.

76 N.C. App. 222 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Aug 6, 1985

Sloan v. Light Co., 248 N.C. 125 , 102 S.E. 2d 822 (1958). However, we find Slade v. Board of Education, 10 N.C. … Brown v. Power Co., 45 N.C. App. 384 , 263 S.E. 2d 366 , disc. rev. denied, 300 N.C. 194 , 269 S.E. 2d 615 (1980).

Kbt Realty Servs., Inc. v. Appycity, LLC

2021 NCBC 47 · North Carolina Business Court · Aug 9, 2021

DEFAULT JUDGMENT v. … See Brown v. Cavit Scis., Inc., 230 N.C. App. 460, 467 (2013) (“A complaint which fails to state a cause of action is not sufficient to support a default judgment for plaintiff.” (citation omitted)). 37.

Greene v. Absorba Oshkosh

North Carolina Industrial Commission · Aug 3, 1999

Brown v. S N Communications, Inc. , 124 N.C. App. 320 , 477 S.E.2d 197 (1996). … Id. ; Brown v. S N Communications, Inc. , 124 N.C. App. 320 , 477 S.E.2d 197 (1996).

Gowing v. Gowing

111 N.C. App. 613 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Aug 17, 1993

Browne v. Browne, 101 N.C. App. 617, 624 , 400 S.E.2d 736, 741 (1991). Thus, the trial court committed no error in deviating from the child support guidelines without a request. … Browne, 101 N.C. App. at 624 , 400 S.E.2d at 740 , see also Williams v. Williams, 105 N.C. App. 615 , 414 S.E.2d 80 (1992).

State v. Odom

307 N.C. 655 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Mar 8, 1983

State v. Brown, 300 N.C. 41, 50 , 265 S.E. 2d 191, 197 (1980). However, that rule was recently altered by an amendment to the North Carolina Rules of Appellate Procedure. … He then boarded a bus for New York when his wife told him “they” were going to kill him.

Rook v. . Horton

190 N.C. 180 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Sep 30, 1925

Defendant asserts that, under tbe rule announced in Brown v. Morisey, 124 N. C., 296 , adverse possession during tbe coverture will, bar dower. Tbe first vital difference between Brown v. … However, in Brown v. Morisey, supra, there were two dissents and one concurring opinion. Brown v. Morisey, 126 N.

MAO/Pines Associates, Ltd. v. NEW HANOVER CTY. BD. OF EQUAL.

116 N.C. App. 551 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Oct 18, 1994

Pines appealed this appraisal to the New Hanover County Board of Equalization and Review for 1991 (Board). During Pines’ appearance before the Board on 18 June 1991, no reference was made to asbestos contamination. … See, e.g., Eways v.

Ripellino v. North Carolina School Boards Ass'n

158 N.C. App. 423 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Jun 17, 2003

(citing Messick v. Catawba County, 110 N.C. … We find the rational in Long persuasive, and hold that the Board, as a governmental entity, is immune from punitive damages. V.

State v. Downs

193 N.C. App. 247 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Oct 7, 2008

Brown to bill customers for charges made to the customers' accounts. … Brown to Edenton Construction's account, and that pursuant to State v. Valladares, 182 N.C.

Guthrie v. Taylor

279 N.C. 703 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Dec 15, 1971

City of Charlotte, 273 N.C. 293 , 160 S.E. 2d 18 ; Motley *714 v. Board of Barber Examiners, 228 N.C. 337 , 45 S.E. 2d 550 , 175 A.L.R. 253 ; State v. Trantham, 230 N.C. 641 , 55 S.E. 2d 198 . … Cheek v. City of Charlotte, supra; State v. Trantham, supra.

In Re the Assessment of Additional Sales & Use Taxes Against Halifax Paper Co.

259 N.C. 589 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Jun 14, 1963

Power Co. v. Bowles, 229 N.C. 143 , 48 S.E. 2d 287 ; McLean v. Board of Elections, 222 N.C. 6 , 21 S.E. 2d 842 . … Cab Co. v.. Charlotte, supra.

Wiggs v. Edgecombe County

179 N.C. App. 47 · Court of Appeals of North Carolina · Aug 1, 2006

Edgecombe County and Edgecombe County Board of Commissioners (“defendants”) appeal an order granting summary judgment in favor of Jerry Wiggs (“plaintiff”) on plaintiff’s claims for declaratory and injunctive relief, denying … Bowers v. City of High Point, 339 N.C. 413, 415 , 451 S.E.2d 284, 286 (1994). N.C. Gen.

George v. McClure

266 F. Supp. 2d 413 · District Court, M.D. North Carolina · Jun 5, 2001

Cunningham v. Brown, 51 N.C.App. 264, 270 , 276 S.E.2d 718, 724 (1981). Further, “a release is subject to avoidance by a showing that its execution resulted from fraud or mutual mistake.” Sykes v. … Keiltex Indus., Inc., 123 N.C.App. 482, 485 , 473 S.E.2d 341, 344 (1996) (citing Cunningham v. Brown, 51 N.CApp. at 269, 276 S.E.2d at 723 ).

Ritchie v. . Ritchie

192 N.C. 538 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Nov 17, 1926

Brown v. Morris, 83 N. C., 251 ; Simpson v. R. R., 112 N. C., 703 ; McCurry v. Purgason, 170 N. C., 463 . … Williams v. Hughes, 139 N. C., 17 ; Waldo v. Wilson, 177 N. C., 461 . In S. v. Horn, 119 N.

State v. Harris

290 N.C. 681 · Supreme Court of North Carolina · Oct 5, 1976

The substance of defendant’s statement was that defendant, Phyllis Brown and David Briggs planned to rob Mr. … This instruction required the jury to determine whether or not Phyllis Brown as an accomplice.