Case law

Russell, Lisa K. v. Principi, Anthony J.

257 F.3d 815 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jul 27, 2001

In Brown v. Brody, 199 F.3d 446, 452 (D.C. Cir. 1999), the court rejected the argument that "poor perfor- mance evaluations are necessarily adverse actions." … The Department also urges us to rely on Rabinovitz v. Pena, 89 F.3d 482 (7th Cir. 1996), a case cited with approval in Brown.

United Mine Workers of America v. Cecil D. Andrus, Secretary of the Interior, Carbon Fuel Co., Intervenor

581 F.2d 888 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · May 31, 1978

of the Board is properly the subject of this review. … Belford, 417 U.S. 642, 650 , 94 S.Ct. 2431, 2436 , 41 L.Ed.2d 374, 381 (1974), citing Brown v. Duchesne, 60 U.S. (19 How.) 183, 194 , 15 L.Ed. 595, 599 (1857). 34 . See, e. g., First Nat’l Bank v.

Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs v. National Van Lines, Inc.

613 F.2d 972 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Nov 13, 1979

Brown-Pacifíc-Maxon, Inc., 340 U.S. 504, 508 , 71 S.Ct. 470 , 95 L.Ed. 483 (1951); Evening Star Newspaper Co. v. Kemp, 175 U.S.App.D.C. 89, 91-92 , 533 F.2d 1224, 1226-1227 (1976); Associated Indemnity Corp. v. … But see Pettus v. American Airlines, Inc., supra note 20, 587 F.2d at 628-629 . . The facts of Boughman are set out in the Board’s opinion, Ekar v.

Truck Drivers, Oil Drivers, Filling Station & Platform Workers' Union Local 705 v. National Labor Relations Board

820 F.2d 448 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 9, 1987

We accept the Board’s factual findings as to Local 705’s intentions, however, because they are amply supported by evidence on the record, see NLRB v. … The Administrative Law Judge, whose recommendation the Board declined to adopt, had determined that under Bill Johnson’s Restaurants, Inc. v.

Operating Engineers Local Union No. 3 of International Union of Operating Engineers v. National Labor Relations Board

266 F.2d 905 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · May 8, 1959

Industry, 116 N.L.R.B. 119 (1956), and language in N.L.R.B. v. … This is an area of interpretation into which we should follow the Board. N.L.R.B. v. Hearst Publications, Inc., 322 U.S. 111, 128-129 , 64 S.Ct. 851 , 88 L.Ed. 1170 ; N.L.R.B. v.

Goodman v. Perpetual Building Association

320 F. Supp. 20 · District Court, District of Columbia · Apr 10, 1970

See also, Commonwealth of Pennsylvania v. Brown, 260 F.Supp. 323 (Pa.1966), where the Court stated that provisos “ * * * are qualifiers, not nullifies”. … Rosenblum v. Judson Eng’r Corp., 99 N.H. 267 , 109 A.2d 558 (1954).

Local 705, International Brotherhood of Teamsters, Chauffeurs, Warehousemen and Helpers of America v. National Labor Relations Board

307 F.2d 197 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jul 19, 1962

Local 705 and its agents petition for review of an order of the National Labor Relations Board issued February 20, 1961 ( 130 NLRB 558 ). The Board cross-petitions for enforcement. … The evidence supports the Board’s findings and the findings support the order. It is undisputed that picketing had continued more than 30 days.

Isler v. United States

824 A.2d 957 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · May 29, 2003

Brown about twelve times but she did not “know how many times he hit him.” 2 ANALYSIS Citing Feaster v. United States, 631 A.2d 400 (D.C.1993) and Alston v. United States, 383 A.2d 307 (D.C.1978), Me. … Brown or what they said to the grand jury in 1994. See United States v.

United States v. Taylor

District Court, District of Columbia · Jan 27, 2023

United States v. … Gov’t Brown Opp. at 6–7 (quoting and discussing Dean v. United States, 556 U.S. 568, 570–76 (2009)).

Burford v. Yellen

246 F. Supp. 3d 161 · District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 31, 2017

Marcus v. Geithner, 813 F. Supp. 2d 11, 17 (D.D.C. 2011). This Court agrees. Accordingly, the Board, which is a federal entity, has moved to dismiss Ms. … V. CONCLUSION For the reasons stated above, the Board’s Motion to Dismiss will be granted in part and denied in part.

United States v. Minick

455 A.2d 874 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jan 5, 1983

One of the officers handcuffed Minick and advised him of his Miranda rights. 1 The police seized a stained white smock from atop an ironing board visible from the armchair. … Cardwell v.

Rafael Rivera v. James P. Mitchell, Secretary of Labor and Appeals Board of the Employees' Compensation Bureau

244 F.2d 783 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · May 29, 1957

244 F.2d 783 100 U.S.App.D.C. 335 Rafael RIVERA, Appellant, v. James P. MITCHELL, Secretary of Labor and Appeals Board of the Employees' Compensation Bureau, Appellees. No. 13680.

Westchester Apartments, Inc. v. Keroes

32 A.2d 869 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jul 13, 1943

Nevertheless it did somewhat later agree to a sublease to one Brown. … Code 1940, 45 — 904; Boss v. Hagan, 49 App.D.C. 106 , 261 E. 254, 8 A.L.R. 150S.

Local 627, International Union of Operating Engineers, Afl-Cio v. National Labor Relations Board, South Prairie Construction Company, Intervenor

595 F.2d 844 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Apr 4, 1979

South Prairie Construction Co. v. … Board determinations will not be overturned unless they are arbitrary and unreasonable, American Bread Co. v.

Potomac Electric Power Company v. Interstate Commerce Commission and United States of America, Consolidated Rail Corporation, Intervenor

702 F.2d 1026 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Mar 31, 1983

Metropolitan Edison Co., 304 U.S. 375, 384-85 , 58 S.Ct. 963, 967 , 82 L.Ed. 1408 (1938); Refractarios Monterrey, S.A. v. Ferro Corp., 606 F.2d 966 (Cust. & Pat.App.1979); Board of Governors v. … See generally British Airways Board v. Port Authority, 564 F.2d 1002, 1010 (2d Cir.1977) (delay can threaten introduction of new technology); Nader v.

Securities & Exchange Commission v. Steadman

798 F. Supp. 733 · District Court, District of Columbia · May 1, 1991

’ counsel that the Funds would liquidate (i.e. return all available cash to the Funds’ shareholders for their shares of the Funds)_” Affidavit of Ellyn Brown (August 3, 1989) (“Brown Aff.”) at ¶¶ 3-4. … V.

Cheryl Taylor v. US Department of Agriculture

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Mar 2, 2011

Before: BROWN, Circuit Judge, and EDWARDS and RANDOLPH, Senior Circuit Judges. … In Bell v.

Melvin W. Coles v. General Howard W. Penny, Director, Defense Mapping Agency

531 F.2d 609 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Feb 23, 1976

19, 1972, the Board held that appellant’s complaint was not supported by the evidence, App. at 39-40, and informed him that “[t]he Civil Service Regulations provide that a decision of the Board is final and that there is … Co., 456 F.2d 1084, 1085 (3d Cir. 1972) (en banc), on remand, 56 F.R.D. 82 (W.D.Pa.1972), aff'd without opinion, 474 F.2d 1340 (3d Cir. 1973); Harris v. National Tea Co., 454 F.2d 307, 309 (7th Cir. 1971). 10 . Brown v.

Duquesne University v. NLRB

947 F.3d 824 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jan 28, 2020

Brown argued the cause for petitioner. With him on the briefs were Arnold E. Perl, Joel Buckman, Ira M. Feinberg, and Amy Folsom Kett. Erin E. … We rejected the Board’s decision even though the college never raised the jurisdictional issue before the Board. Carroll Coll. v. NLRB, 558 F.3d 568, 574 (D.C. Cir. 2009).

United States v. John Fitzgerald Rogers

918 F.2d 207 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Nov 9, 1990

Valentine Brown then testified as an expert witness on drugs. … Welfare v.