Case law

Sumner Coal Mining Co. v. Pleasant

127 Okla. 174 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Dec 14, 1926

The powers of the corporation are exercised by and through its board of directors, and the property of the corporation is subject to the control of the board. Section 5334, C. O. S. 1921. … It was said -by the Supreme Court of Utah, in the ease of Gay v. Young Men’s Consolidated Co-Op.

Opinion No. 92-558 (1992)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Oct 20, 1992

AND, AS DISCUSSED IN RELATION TO 162 AND 452, THE BOARD IS A "PRINCIPAL OFFICER" WITHIN THE MEANING OF 19 O.S. 180 .65, SEE, ADAIR COUNTY EXCISE BOARD V. BOARD OF COUNTY COM'RS, SUPRA. … IN STATE V.

St. Louis S. F. R. Co. v. Davis

37 Okla. 340 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 6, 1913

Brown v. Ghicago, M. & St. P. Ry. Co., 54 Wis. 342 , 11 N. W. 356, 911 , 41 Am. Rep. 41 ; Kreuziger v. Chicago & N. W. Ry. Co., 73 Wis. 158 , 40 N. W. 657 ; Haverly v. State Line & S. R. … East Tenn., V. & G. R. Co. v. Lockhart, 79 Ala. 315 ; L. & N. Rail *347 road Co. v. Dancy, 97 Ala. 338 , 11 South, 796 ; Case v. Delaware, L. & W. Ry. Co., 191 Pa. 450 , 43 Atl. 319 ; Brown v. Chicago, M. & St. P. Ry.

Opinion No. (2009)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Dec 8, 2009

Jackson v. Freeman , 905 P.2d 217 , 221 (Okla. 1995). … Kelly v. Okla. Pardon Parole Bd. , 637 P.2d 858 (Okla. Crim. App. 1981) (citing Greenholtz v. Inmates of the Neb. Penal Corr. Complex , 442 U.S. 1 , 7 (1979)); Shabazz v. Keating , 977 P.2d 1089 , 1093 (Okla. 1999).

Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. Tate

57 Okla. 215 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 11, 1916

Co. v. … Smith v. C., R. I. & P. Ry. Co., 42 Okla. 577 , 142 Pac. 398 .”

Opinion No. (1979)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Apr 17, 1979

City of Ardmore, v. Excise Board of Carter County, Okla., 197 P.2d 961 (1948). The county excise board is not authorized to refuse to make appropriations required by law to be made. Excise Board of Creek County v. … City of Ardmore v. Excise Board of Carter County, 155 Okla. 126 , 8 P.2d 2 (1932).

Opinion No. (1994)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Nov 10, 1994

Granting permission for municipal annexation of school property falls within the purview of the local boards' power to exercise sole control over the district property. ¶ 6 In fact, in James v. … Carlyle v. Independent School District No. I-71 of McCurtain County, 811 P.2d 618 , 620 (Okla.App. 1991), citing Board of Education of Oklahoma City v.

St. Louis-San Francisco Ry. Co. v. Dickey

113 Okla. 72 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jul 14, 1925

In the case of Oklahoma News Co. v. … Iln the case of Payne v.

Opinion No. (1994)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jun 24, 1994

The Oklahoma Supreme Court was persuaded by the decision in the Montana case of Board of Regents of Higher Education v. … The Baker court was also influenced by the Nebraska case of Board of Regents of University of Nebraska v.

Clark v. Carter

86 Okla. 126 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Mar 28, 1922

With reference to the State Board of Public Affairs in this particular case, and in reference to the powers of the State Board of Affairs generally, there appears to be an unjustified confusion as to whether the Board of … Tulsa v. Purdy, 73 Oklahoma, 174 Pac. 759 . This, in our opinion, is the law which governs this case.

In Re Klapp

80 B.R. 540 · United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Dec 11, 1987

Further, they rely on Board of County Commissioners of Tulsa County, et al., v. Leslie, a decision of the Oklahoma Court of Appeals dated May 12, 1987, and published in volume 58, number 19, OBAJ. … Debtors rely upon Lincoln Mortgage Investors v. Cook, 659 P.2d 925 (Okl.1982); Mills v.

Seldon Construction Co. v. Dowell

187 Okla. 312 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 30, 1940

Stephenson - Browne Lumber Company intervened and asked judgment for $1,092.65 and attorney’s fees and costs, and Ellison Plumbing & Heating Company also intervened, asking judgment in the sum of $515 and attorney’s fees … Wetzel v. Rixse, 93 Okla. 216 , 220 P. 607 ; Sand Springs R. Co. v. Smith, 84 Okla. 211 , 203 P. 207 ; Garrison Coal Co. v. Semple, 82 Okla. 60 , 198 P. 497 . The judgment is affirmed. BAYLESS, C.

Najera ex rel. S.N. v. Independent School District of Stroud No. I-54

60 F. Supp. 3d 1202 · District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Oct 7, 2014

Wilson v. Montano, 715 F.3d 847, 852 (10th Cir.2013). Analysis A. Stroud Public School Board Plaintiffs concede that the Stroud Public School Board is not a proper defendant in this case. Doc. No. 6, at 4. … Sutton v.

Wallace v. Bullen

9 Okla. 1 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Jun 27, 1898

The supreme'court of Ohio, in Chamberlin v. City of Cleveland, 84 Ohio, 551; of Iowa, in two cases, Royce v. Jenney, 50 Iowa 679, Harney v. Board, 44 Iowa 203; the supreme court of Wisconsin, in Kelly v. … Co. v. Wasco Co., 2 Oregon, 206; the supreme court of California, in Patten v. Green, 13 Cal. 329; People v. Reynolds, 28 Cal. 113, and Wells-Fargo Co. v.

Arnold v. McAuliffe

201 Okla. 639 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · May 17, 1949

Brown, St. Frauds, sec. 428; 1 Greenl. Ev. sec. 302; 2 Story, Eq. Jur. 770; Cummings v. Arnold, 3 Metc. (Mass.) 494; Faw v. Whittington, 72 N. C. 321 ; Miller v. Pierce, 104 N. C. 389 , 10 S. E. 554 ; Falls v. … Eq. 237; Banks v. Banks, 77 N. C. 186 ; Herren v. Rich, 95 N. C. 500 ; Holden v. Purefoy, 108 N. C. 167 , 12 S. E. 848 ; Taylor v. Taylor, 112 N. C. 27 , 16 S. E. 924 ; Fortune v. Watkins, 94 N. C. 304 . In McDougald v.

Opinion No. (1991) Ag

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jul 16, 1991

THE TERM "PUBLIC OFFICE" WAS FIRST DEFINED IN THE CASE OF GUTHRIE DAILY LEADER V. … THIS WAS LATER FOLLOWED BY THE CASE OF OKLAHOMA CITY V.

Opinion No. (1997)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Jan 27, 1997

Berry v. Board of Governors of Registered Dentists, 611 P.2d 628 , 632 (Okla. 1980). … Independent School District No. 89 of Oklahoma County v. Oklahoma City Federation of Teachers, 612 P.2d 719 , 722 (Okla. 1980) (citing Rogers v.

Fleming v. Peoples Packing Co.

42 F. Supp. 868 · District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · Jan 21, 1942

This same line of reasoning was approved in Brown v. Maryland, 12 Wheat. 419 , 25 U.S. 419 , 6 L.Ed. 678 . … In National Labor Relations Board v.

Tinkelpaugh-Kimmel Hardware Co. v. Minneapolis Threshing MacH. Co.

20 Okla. 187 · Supreme Court of Oklahoma · Apr 20, 1908

Norman v. Phillips, 14 Mees. & W. 277; Hanson v. Armitage, 5 Barn. & Ald. 559; Maxwell v. Brown, 39 Me. 98 , 63 Am. Dec. 605 ; Johnson v. Cuttle, 105 Mass. 447 , 7 Am. Rep. 545 ; Grimes v. … Jamison v. Simons, 68 Cal. 17 , 8 Pac. 502 ; Stone v. Browning, 68 N. Y. 598 ; Shepherd v. Pressey, 32 N. H. 49; Dinnie v. Johnson, 8 N. D. 153 , 77 N. W. 612 ; Jones v.

Opinion No. (2001)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports · Nov 8, 2001

Board of Regents v. … In the first such case, Board of Regents v.