Case law

Norton v. Leisering

125 A.2d 56 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jul 30, 1956

Hendelberg v. Goldstein, 93 U.S.App. D.C. 395, 211 F.2d 428 . . “ * * *, ,1 think there is no valid distinction between revocation and refusal to renew.” Wilbur K. … See also Minkoff v. Payne, 93 U.S. App.D.C. 123, 210 P.2d 689 .

Capitol Hill Group v. Pillsbury, Winthrop, Shaw, Pittman, LLC

569 F.3d 485 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 26, 2009

Before: HENDERSON, BROWN and KAVANAUGH, Circuit Judges. … Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge BROWN.  2 BROWN, Circuit Judge: Appellant Capitol Hill Group (CHG) filed suit in the Superior Court of the District of Columbia against its former

Duru v. Dist. of Columbia

303 F. Supp. 3d 63 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Apr 9, 2018

Hairsine v. … Brown's infraction and chose not to discipline her. See Isse v. Am.

Lipscomb v. Winter

577 F. Supp. 2d 258 · District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 18, 2008

Stella v. Mineta, 284 F.3d 135, 145 (D.C.Cir.2002) (citing Brown v. Brody, 199 F.3d 446, 452 (D.C.Cir.1999)). … Forkkio v. Powell, 306 F.3d 1127, 1131 (D.C.Cir.2002) (citing Brown, 199 F.3d at 457 ).

United States v. Minick

455 A.2d 874 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jan 5, 1983

One of the officers handcuffed Minick and advised him of his Miranda rights. 1 The police seized a stained white smock from atop an ironing board visible from the armchair. … Cardwell v.

Local Lodge No. 1424, International Association of MacHinists Afl-Cio and International Association of MacHinists Afl-Cio v. National Labor Relations Board, National Labor Relations Board v. Bryan Manufacturing Company

264 F.2d 575 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Feb 27, 1959

Co. v. N.L.R.B., supra; see N.L.R.B. v. Textile Mach. Works, Inc., 3 Cir., 1954, 214 F.2d 929 . The Board is prohibited, however, from making any legal conclusion with regard to events outside the statutory period. … We therefore uphold the Board's order under the authority of N.L.R.B. v. Gaynor News Co., supra, 2 Cir., 1952, 197 F.2d 719 , affirmed sub nom. Radio Officers' Union of Commercial Telegraphers Union, A.F.L. v.

American Forest Resource Council v. United States

77 F.4th 787 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jul 18, 2023

The ASQ has fluctuated over time, starting at 500 million board feet in 1937 and peaking at 1.2 billion board feet in 1972. See Murphy, 65 F.4th at 1127. … LLC v. Bernhardt, 417 F. Supp. 3d 22, 27–28 & n.4 (D.D.C. 2019). The minimum timber volume the BLM must sell annually, then, is 123 million board feet and the maximum is 287 million board feet.

Doe v. Daversa Partners

District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 19, 2023

Starting with Howard University v. Best, the D.C. … Luce v. United States, 469 U.S. 38, 41 n.4 (1984); see also Dietz v.

Smith v. District of Columbia

District Court, District of Columbia · Dec 14, 2020

Bynum v. District of Columbia, 257 F. Supp. 2d 1, 1 (D.D.C. 2002); Barnes v. District of Columbia, 924 F. Supp. 2d 74, 77 (D.D.C. 2013). 100. … Smith v. D.C., 306 F. Supp. 3d 223, 233-40 (D.D.C. 2018) (citing to Barnes v. District of Columbia, 793 F.

Keenan (William) v. Benefits Review Board, Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs, U.S. Department of Labor

831 F.2d 312 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Oct 30, 1987

831 F.2d 312 265 U.S.App.D.C. 311 Keenan (William) v. Benefits Review Board, Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs, U.S.

Southwest Regional Joint Board, Amalgamated Clothing Workers of America, Afl-Cio v. N. L. R. B

559 F.2d 188 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 24, 1977

P 10,147 Southwest Regional Joint Board, Amalgamated Clothing Workers of America, AFL-CIO v. N. L. R. B. No. 76-1592 United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit 6/24/77 1 N.L.R.B.

Price v. Griffin

359 A.2d 582 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jun 23, 1976

Price informed him that his name would be submitted to the board of the corporation for nomination as a director. … Brown v. Coates, 102 U.S.App.D.C. 300 , 253 F.2d 36 (1958); Gombos v. Ashe, 158 Cal.App.2d 517 , 322 P.2d 933 (1958); White v. Doney, 82 Idaho 217 , 351 P.2d 380 (1960).

Armenian Assembly of America, Inc. v. Cafesjian

597 F. Supp. 2d 128 · District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 19, 2009

AGM & M is governed by a Board of Trustees who serve as the Board of Directors of AGM & M. Id. ¶ 12. Defendant Waters, Jr. is CFF’s representative member on AGM & M’s Board of Trustees. Id. ¶¶ 16,17,19. … Brown v. Collins, 402 F.2d 209 , 212 & n. 4 (D.C.Cir.1968). 6 . In their Reply, Plaintiffs emphasize that this and several other statements could be considered non-defamatory opinion that is not ordinarily actionable.

Russell, Lisa K. v. Principi, Anthony J.

257 F.3d 815 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jul 27, 2001

In Brown v. Brody, 199 F.3d 446, 452 (D.C. Cir. 1999), the court rejected the argument that "poor perfor- mance evaluations are necessarily adverse actions." … The Department also urges us to rely on Rabinovitz v. Pena, 89 F.3d 482 (7th Cir. 1996), a case cited with approval in Brown.

Teamsters Local Unions 745, 47, 886, 523, 270, 5, 568, 667 & 891 v. National Labor Relations Board

370 F.2d 226 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Oct 14, 1966

V. Braswell, all herein referred to as Bras-well. The latter would have us set aside the order based on the Board’s decision that Braswell had violated Section 8(a) (5) of the National Labor Relations Act, as amended. … Petitions for review are denied, and Order of the Board is enforced.

Jones v. Johnston

368 F. Supp. 571 · District Court, District of Columbia · Jan 9, 1974

Shelton v. United States Board of Parole, supra. … See Sutherland v. D. C. Board of Parole, supra, Marchand v. Director, U. S. Probation Office, 421 F. 2d 331 , 335 n. 5 (1st Cir. 1970).

Hugh Kaufman v. Thomas Perez

745 F.3d 521 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Mar 14, 2014

Brown v. Brody, 199 F.3d 446, 455 (D.C.Cir.1999) (even when there is a “significant change in duties or responsibilities ... there must still be some kind of injury for a federal employee to state a claim”). … Rich v.

Isler v. United States

824 A.2d 957 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · May 29, 2003

Brown about twelve times but she did not “know how many times he hit him.” 2 ANALYSIS Citing Feaster v. United States, 631 A.2d 400 (D.C.1993) and Alston v. United States, 383 A.2d 307 (D.C.1978), Me. … Brown or what they said to the grand jury in 1994. See United States v.

Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs v. National Van Lines, Inc.

613 F.2d 972 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Nov 13, 1979

Brown-Pacifíc-Maxon, Inc., 340 U.S. 504, 508 , 71 S.Ct. 470 , 95 L.Ed. 483 (1951); Evening Star Newspaper Co. v. Kemp, 175 U.S.App.D.C. 89, 91-92 , 533 F.2d 1224, 1226-1227 (1976); Associated Indemnity Corp. v. … But see Pettus v. American Airlines, Inc., supra note 20, 587 F.2d at 628-629 . . The facts of Boughman are set out in the Board’s opinion, Ekar v.

Operating Engineers Local Union No. 3 of International Union of Operating Engineers v. National Labor Relations Board

266 F.2d 905 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · May 8, 1959

Industry, 116 N.L.R.B. 119 (1956), and language in N.L.R.B. v. … This is an area of interpretation into which we should follow the Board. N.L.R.B. v. Hearst Publications, Inc., 322 U.S. 111, 128-129 , 64 S.Ct. 851 , 88 L.Ed. 1170 ; N.L.R.B. v.