Case law

A. Eugene Ramey v. Charles Bowsher, Comptroller of the United States

915 F.2d 731 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Oct 5, 1990

See Ramey v. GAO, 1 PAB R & D 102, 115-19 (Oct. 19, 1981), reproduced in part at Joint Appendix (“J.A.”) at 333. Accordingly, the Appeals Board awarded Ra-mey the requested within-grade salary increase. … See Brown v. GSA, 425 U.S. 820, 835 , 96 S.Ct. 1961, 1969 , 48 L.Ed.2d 402 (1976) (Title VII “provides the exclusive judicial remedy for claims of discrimination in federal employment”). B.

Smith v. FENTY

684 F. Supp. 2d 64 · District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 16, 2010

Defendants Fenty and Brown filed a joint motion to dismiss on September 24, 2009. See generally Fenty & Brown Mot. On September 28, 2009, the court advised the plaintiff, pursuant to Fox v. … Macharia v. United States, 334 F.3d 61, 64, 67 (D.C.Cir.2003); Holy Land Found, for Relief & Dev. v. Ashcroft, 333 F.3d 156, 165 (D.C.Cir.2003); Browning, 292 F.3d at 242 .

United States v. Zabavsky

District Court, District of Columbia · Nov 30, 2022

Hylton-Brown’s person and evidence that Mr. Hylton-Brown was wearing an ankle monitor at the time of his death. This evidence will be excluded at trial. I. BACKGROUND As previously described, see United States v. … Hylton-Brown’s actions “by themselves” cannot defeat proximate cause, Mr. Hylton-Brown’s conduct therefore is irrelevant. Fleming v. United States, 224 A.3d at 226. The Court disagrees.

Chevy Chase Citizens Ass'n v. District of Columbia Council

327 A.2d 310 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Oct 22, 1974

C. v. District of Columbia Minimum Wage and Industrial Safety Board, D.C.App., 318 A.2d 294 (1974). That case involved the minimum wage to be paid to employees in the hotel, restaurant, and allied occupations. … That statute was considered by this court in Wallace v. District Unemployment Compensation Board, D.C.App., 289 A.2d 885 (1972).

Southwest Regional Joint Board, Amalgamated Clothing Workers of America, Afl-Cio v. N. L. R. B

559 F.2d 188 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 24, 1977

P 10,147 Southwest Regional Joint Board, Amalgamated Clothing Workers of America, AFL-CIO v. N. L. R. B. No. 76-1592 United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit 6/24/77 1 N.L.R.B.

Shade v. United States Congress

942 F. Supp. 2d 43 · District Court, District of Columbia · Apr 19, 2013

Scolaro v. D.C. Board of Elections and Ethics, 104 F. Supp. 2d 18, 22 (D.D.C. 2000); see also Coalition for Underground Expansion v. Mineta, 333 F.3d 193, 198 (D.C. Cir. 2003). B. … See id.; Browning v. Clinton, 292 F.3d 235, 242 (D.C. Cir. 2002). “Threadbare recitals of the elements of a cause of action, supported by mere conclusory statements, do not suffice.” Ashcroft v.

Lively v. Flexible Packaging Ass'n

830 A.2d 874 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Aug 21, 2003

See also Brown v. … See Woodland v.

Lipscomb v. Winter

577 F. Supp. 2d 258 · District Court, District of Columbia · Sep 18, 2008

Stella v. Mineta, 284 F.3d 135, 145 (D.C.Cir.2002) (citing Brown v. Brody, 199 F.3d 446, 452 (D.C.Cir.1999)). … Forkkio v. Powell, 306 F.3d 1127, 1131 (D.C.Cir.2002) (citing Brown, 199 F.3d at 457 ).

In Re Danaher Corporation Shareholder Derivative Litigation

District Court, District of Columbia · Jun 28, 2021

SEC v. Brown, 740 F. Supp. 2d 148, 166 (D.D.C. 2010) (cleaned up). … Goodman Life Income Tr. v.

Doe v. Daversa Partners

District Court, District of Columbia · Jul 19, 2023

Starting with Howard University v. Best, the D.C. … Luce v. United States, 469 U.S. 38, 41 n.4 (1984); see also Dietz v.

United States v. James Otis Brown, A/K/A Steven Brown

990 F.2d 1377 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 16, 1993

UNITED STATES of America v. James Otis BROWN, a/k/a Steven Brown, Appellant. No. 92-3018. United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit. March 30, 1993. … See United States v. Gibbs, 904 F.2d 52, 57 (D.C.Cir.1990); United States v. Zabalaga, 834 F.2d 1062, 1065 (D.C.Cir.1987).

Swedish American Hospital v. Leavitt

District Court, District of Columbia · Mar 5, 2010

Macharia v. United States, 334 F.3d 61, 64, 67 (D.C. Cir. 2003); Holy Land Found. for Relief & Dev. v. Ashcroft, 333 F.3d 156, 165 (D.C. Cir. 2003); Browning, 292 F.3d at 242. … Warren v. District of Columbia, 353 F.3d 36, 40 (D.C. Cir. 2004); Browning, 292 F.3d at 242. “Threadbare recitals of the elements of a cause of action, supported by mere conclusory statements, do not suffice.”

Akins v. United States

679 A.2d 1017 · District of Columbia Court of Appeals · Jun 20, 1996

Appellants Barnes and Carrero, however, were not able to cross-examine Theron Brown either at the grand jury or at trial. See Pointer v. … United States, 362 U.S. 257, 261 , 80 S.Ct. 725, 731 , 4 L.Ed.2d 697 (1960); Brown v. United States, 627 A.2d 499, 502-04 (D.C.1993).

United States v. Singhal

842 F. Supp. 2d 1 · District Court, District of Columbia · Feb 2, 2011

See, e.g., Fisher v. United States, 425 U.S. 391, 403 , 96 S.Ct. 1569 , 48 L.Ed.2d 39 (1976). … See Calvin Klein Trademark Trust v. Wachner, 124 F.Supp.2d 207, 209 (S.D.N.Y.2000).

John Doe v. Public Company Accounting Oversight Board

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jun 9, 2026

Fund v. Pub. Co. Acct. Oversight Bd., 561 U.S. 477, 485 (2010). The Board promulgates accounting standards, initiates investigations, conducts disciplinary adjudications, and issues sanctions. See id. … Doe v. Pub. Co. Acct. Oversight Bd., 2024 WL 3954189, at *2 (D.D.C. Aug. 2, 2024).

E. I. Du Pont De Nemours & Co. v. Ladd

224 F. Supp. 149 · District Court, District of Columbia · Dec 3, 1963

The Patent Office Board of Appeals affirmed that rejection of the claims, and the sole issue before this Court is whether the conclusion reached by the Board of Appeals was clearly erroneous. … Signal Manufacturing Co. v. General Electric Co., D.C., 217 F.Supp. 734 .

United States v. Recognition Equipment Inc.

725 F. Supp. 587 · District Court, District of Columbia · Nov 20, 1989

United States v. Treadwell, 760 F.2d 327 (D.C.Cir.1985), cer t. denied, 474 U.S. 1064 , 106 S.Ct. 814 , 88 L.Ed.2d 788 (1986); United States v. Puerto, 730 F.2d 627 (11th Cir.1984); United States v. … [Tr. 4160] V.

Daniels v. Union Pacific Railroad

530 F.3d 936 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Jul 1, 2008

Fox entered appearances.  2 Before: HENDERSON, ROGERS and BROWN, Circuit Judges. … See also Carpenter v.

Mistick PBT v. Chao, Elaine

440 F.3d 503 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Mar 17, 2006

Before: HENDERSON, BROWN, and GRIFFITH, Circuit Judges.  2 Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge GRIFFITH. … Pursuant to 29 C.F.R. § 7.1(b), Mistick appealed to the Administrative Review Board (the “Board”).

Laborers' International Union of North America, AFL-CIO, Local Union No. 1057 v. National Labor Relations Board

567 F.2d 1006 · Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · Nov 23, 1977

NLRB v. … NLRB v. Brown, 380 U.S. 278, 291-292 , 85 S.Ct. 980, 988 , 13 L.Ed.2d 839, 849 (1965); Lubrizol Corp. v. EPA, 183 U.S.App.D.C. 288, 300 , 562 F.2d 807, 819 (1977).